Pierson, Frederick Lockwood; Descendants of Stephen Pierson, of Suffolk County England, and New Haven and Derby, Conn., 1643-1739. Amenia, NY: Walsh & Griffen Printers, 1895.
Connecticut Town Birth Records, pre-1870 (Barbour Collection)
American Genealogical-Biographical Index (AGBI) Reference: Gen. Column of the " Boston Transcript". 1906-1941.( The greatest single source of material for gen. Data for the N.E. area and for the period 1600-1800. Completely indexed in the Index.): 24 May 1935, 361; 26 Sep 1935, 361; 14 Oct 1935, 361
Early Connecticut Marriages
Connecticut. Church Records Index. Connecticut State Library, Hartford, Connecticut.
Is Hannah your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Hannah by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Hannah:
The Ancestry link was added by another genealogist, so I don't know. I added the "after 1768" death date from the birth date of the last child born, who is listed on the FAG site. There is an exact birth date listed on the FAG site, which is different from the birth date in this profile data. The FAG site also lists the parents and spouse.
When you delve into the sources on these 2 profiles, the information is identical. The birth date on this one in the data section does not match the source from Ancestry.com, but the Ancestry.com birth date is identical to the Peet-476 birth date. These 2 profiles should be merged, as they are clear duplicates.