no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Mary (Peters) Chandler (1668 - 1753)

Mary Chandler formerly Peters
Born in Ipswich, Essex, Massachusetts Baymap
Ancestors ancestors
Wife of — married 22 May 1686 in Andover, Essex, Massachusetts Bay Colonymap
Descendants descendants
Died at age 85 in Andover, Essex, Massachusetts Baymap
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Barry Sweetman private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 14 Sep 2010
This page has been accessed 945 times.

Biography

Mary, daughter of Andrew Peters and Mercy Beamsley, was born on 12 Jun 1668 in Ipswich, Essex, Massachusetts Bay Colony.[1][2]

Sources

  1. "Massachusetts, Town Clerk, Vital and Town Records, 1626-2001", database with images, FamilySearch: 13 July 2016, Mary Peeters, 12 Jun 1668; citing Birth, Ipswich, Essex, Massachusetts, United States, , town clerk offices, Massachusetts; FHL microfilm 777,636.
  2. Edmond Frank Peters and Eleanor Bradley Peters, Peters of New England: A Genealogy, and Family History (New York, NY, USA: The Knickerbocker Press, 1903), Pages 1, 20, 29, 34, 35

Vital Records of Andover, Massachusetts, to the End of the Year 1849 (Topsfield Historical Society, Topsfield, Mass., 1912)





Is Mary your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Mary by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Mary:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 1

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Peters-624 and Peters-500 appear to represent the same person because: These profiles are the same person.
posted by Doug Lockwood