no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Rebecca (Pierce) Manning (1692 - 1775)

Rebecca Manning formerly Pierce aka Winship
Born in Woburn, Middlesex, Province of Massachusetts Baymap
Ancestors ancestors
Wife of — married 11 Feb 1714 (to 5 Mar 1721) in Lexington, Middlesex, Province of Massachusetts Baymap
Wife of — married 6 Jun 1728 in Cambridge, Middlesex, Province of Massachusetts Baymap
Descendants descendants
Died at age 82 in Cambridge, Middlesex, Province of Massachusetts Baymap
Profile last modified | Created 14 May 2013
This page has been accessed 441 times.

Biography

Rebecca Pierce was born in Woburn, Middlesex County. Massachusetts September 16, 1692. She was the daughter of James Pierce and Elizabeth Parker Pierce.[1][2][3]

She was married February 2, 1714 in Lexington, Middlesex County, to Nathaniel Winship, son of Edward Winship and Rebecca Barsham Winship. After Nathaniel Winship's death, in 1721, she married (2) John Manning on June 6, 1728. [1][2][3]

Rebecca died about March 11, 1775 in Cambridge, Middlesex County.[2]

Sources

  1. 1.0 1.1 Massachusetts Marriages 1633-1850; Family History Library, Salt Lake City, Utah; Film #0962818, item 2.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 North American Family Histories 1500-2000; The Manning Family; page 158.
  3. 3.0 3.1 U S and Internatonal Marriage Records 1560-1900; Yates Publishing database on-line (Ancestry.com).
  • Source: S79 Abbreviation: Pierce genealogy : being the record of the posteri Title: Pierce, Frederic Beech, Pierce genealogy : being the record of the posterity of Thomas Pierce, an early inhabitant of Charlestown and afterwords heritagequest online (via Kitsap Public Library) Page: pages xi, 28-29 Data: Text: James, Woburn, s. of Thomas, Jr., b. 1659, m. Elizabeth Kendall, and had Elizabeth, b. Oct. 11, 1688; James, b. Feb. 28, 1690; Rebecca and Mary. CONT CONT p. xiii: CONT CONT James, Woburn, s. of Thomas, Jr., b. 1659, m. Elizabeth Kendall, and had Elizabeth, b. Oct. 11, 1688; James, b. Feb. 28, 1690; Rebecca and Mary. CONT CONT p. xviii: CONT CONT Thomas, Charlestown Village alias Woburn; m. May 6, 1635, Elizabeth Cole, often styled "Sergt. Thomas," selectman, Woburn, 1660l had ch. Ensign John, b. Mar. 7, 1643; Thomas, b. June 21, 1645; Elizabeth, b. Dec. 25, 1646; Joseph, b. Sept. 22, 1648, d. Feb. 27, 1649; Joseph, b. Aug. 13, 1649; Stephen, b. July 16,1651; Samuel, b. Feb. 20, 1654; d. Oct. 27, 1655; Samuel, b. Apr. 7, 1656; William, b. Mar. 7, 1858; James, b. May 7, 1659; Abigail, b. Nov. 20, 1660; Benjamin, m. Mary Reed. CONT CONT p. 23: CONT CONT 31. x. JAMES, b. May 7, 1659; m. Elizabeth Kendall. CONT CONT pages. 28-29: CONT CONT 31. JAMES3 PIERCE (Thomas2, Thomas1), b. May 7, 1659; m.* Elizabeth Kendall, b. Jan. 15, 1653, d. Oct. 16, 1715. He res. in Woburn and d. Jan. 20, 1742. CONT �Children:--- CONT CONT 96. i. ELIZABETH, b. Oct. 11, 1688. CONT 97. ii. JAMES, b. Feb. 28, 1690; m. Hannah _____, and Phebe _____. CONT 98. iii. REBECKAH, b . Sept. 16, 1692; m. Feb. 12, 1714, Nathaniel Winship. CONT 99. iv. MARY, b. _____; m. Lea F. Kendall. CONT CONT * By this marriage a lunas naturae of an extra finger or toe, and sometimes both, was produced, and this has ever since appeared in this branch of the family. CONT CONT

Acknowledgments

Thank you to Claire Smith for creating WikiTree profile Peirce-302 through the import of smithwiki.ged on Jul 1, 2013. Click to the Changes page for the details of edits by Claire and others.





Is Rebecca your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Rebecca by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Rebecca:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 1

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Peirce-302 and Pierce-2911 appear to represent the same person because: Same date and place of birth, same parents, no conflicting information. Slight difference in spelling (Peirce/Pierce) but still the same name.

P  >  Pierce  |  M  >  Manning  >  Rebecca (Pierce) Manning