MA Family Histories 1500-2000
US Rev War Rolls 1775-1783
↑ Pitts-1931 was created by JoAnn Miller through the import of Pitts Family Wiki.ged on Oct 10, 2014. This comment and citation can be deleted after the biography has been edited and primary sources are included.
↑ Source: #S83 Page: Year: 1810; Census Place: Camillus, Onondaga, New York; Roll: 34; Page: 80; Image: 00047; Family History Library Film: 0181388
↑ Source: #S84 Page: 1830 US Census; Census Place: Pompey, Onondaga, New York; Page: 293; NARA Series: M19; Roll Number: 100; Family History Film: 0017160
↑ Source: #S84 Page: 1830 US Census; Census Place: Pompey, Onondaga, New York; Page: 293; NARA Series: M19; Roll Number: 100; Family History Film: 0017160
↑ Source: #S83 Page: Year: 1810; Census Place: Camillus, Onondaga, New York; Roll: 34; Page: 80; Image: 00047; Family History Library Film: 0181388
Source: S70 Author: Godfrey Memorial Library, comp. Title: American Genealogical-Biographical Index (AGBI) Publication: Name: Ancestry.com Operations Inc; Repository: #R8
Source: S82 Author: Edmund West, comp. Title: Family Data Collection - Individual Records Publication: Name: Ancestry.com Operations Inc; Repository: #R8
Source: S83 Author: Ancestry.com Title: 1810 United States Federal Census Publication: Name: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc.; Repository: #R8
Source: S84 Author: Ancestry.com Title: 1830 United States Federal Census Publication: Name: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc.; Repository: #R8
Source: S85 Author: Ancestry.com Title: Massachusetts Soldiers and Sailors in the War of the Revolution, 17 Vols Publication: Name: Ancestry.com Operations Inc; Repository: #R8
Notes
Note N42In the 1790 census for Massachusetts, Hampshire County, Westfield; a Samuel Pitt is shown in the following household: 143
Samuel (b. 1770) could be married and this may be his household with younger sons and daughters
1 male +16 Samuel (b. 1746)
4 males -16 Noble (b. 1774)
Luke (b. 1776)
Charles ?
Henry (b. 1786)
John (b. 1788)
3 females Silence (b. 1771) could be married
Hannah (b. 1778)
Cynthia (b. 1780) could be wrong birth year for Cynthia
Hannah Noble (b. 1752)
In the 1790 census for Massachusetts, Hampshire County, Orange; a Samuel Pitt is shown in the following household: 234
My speculation:
2 males +16 Samuel (b. 1746)
Noble (b. 1774)
4 males -16 Luke (b. 1776)
Charles ?
Henry (b. 1786)
John (b. 1788)
4 females Silence (b. 1771)
Hannah (b. 1778)
Cynthia (b. 1780 or 1790)
Hannah Noble (b. 1752)
This household appears to be the better fit.
In the 1800 census for Massachusetts, Hampshire County, Orange; a Samuel Pitts is shown in the following household: 1131101110
1 male -10 Quartus (b. 1792)
1 male 10-15 John (b. 1788)
3 males 16-25 Charles ?
Henry (b. 1786)
unknown
1 male 26-44 Noble (b. 1774)
1 male 45+ Samuel (b. 1746 = 54)
1 female 10-15 Hannah (b. 1778) or Cynthia (b. 1790)
1 female 16-25 Cynthia (b. 1780)
1 female 26-44 Hannah Noble (b. 1752 = 48)
Samuel, Luke and Silence would have been old enough to have married. Hannah Noble's age is off and Thankful (b. 1794) is missing.
In the 1800 census for Massachusetts, Hampshire County, Orange; a Samuel Bishop Pitts is shown in the following household: 1121101001
My speculation:
1 male -10 Quartus (b. 1792)
1 male 10-15 John (b. 1788)
2 males 16-25 Charles ?
Henry (b. 1786)
1 male 26-44 Noble (b. 1774)
1 male 45+ Samuel (b. 1746 = 54)
1 female 10-15 Cynthia (b. 1790) or Hannah (b. 1778)
1 female 45+ Hannah Noble (b. 1752 = 48)
Samuel, Luke and Silence would have been old enough to have married. Hannah Noble is a better fit, Cynthia (if b. 1780) could also be married but Thankful is missing.
In the 1800 census for New York, Washington County, Salem; a Samuel Pitts is shown in the following household: 2001001
This could be the Samuel Pitts (b. 1770), son of Samuel (b. 1746)
2 males -10 unknown
unknown
1 male 26-45 Samuel (b. 1770)
1 female 26-45 Thankful Gates
In the 1800 census for Massachusetts, Berkshire County, Dalton; a Samuel Pitts is shown in the following household: 100001101
This household is probably not related to Samuel Pitts (b. 1746) but intersting as Royal Noble is nearby
1 male -10 unknown
1 female -10 unknown
1 female 10-15 unknown
1 female 26-44 unknown
In the1810 census for New York, Onondaga County; Samuel Pitts is shown in the following household:
020105001
This could be the Samuel Pitts (b. 1770), son of Samuel (b. 1746)
2 males 10-15 unknown
unknown
1 male 26-44 Samuel (b. 1770)
5 females -10 all unknown
1 female 26-44 Thankful Gates
1830 census shows Samuel Pitts (80 to 90) with one female 30 to 40 and one female 70 to 80 living next door to Nobel Pitts.
Is Samuel your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Samuel by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Samuel: