no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Mary (Porter) Grant (1637 - 1681)

Mary Grant formerly Porter
Born in Felsted, Essex, Englandmap
Ancestors ancestors
Wife of — married 27 May 1658 in East Windsor, Hartford, Connecticutmap
Descendants descendants
Died at age 44 in Windsor, Hartford, Connecticutmap
Problems/Questions Profile managers: Bonnie Nilsen private message [send private message] and Paula Hinkel private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 13 Sep 2010
This page has been accessed 2,833 times.

Biography

Mary Porter was baptized 1 Oct 1637 at Felsted, Essex, England, the daughter of John Porter & Anna White.[1]

Marriage 27 MAR 1658 Windsor, Hartford County, Connecticut
Husband: Samuel Grant
Wife: Mary Porter

They had 9 children during the ensuing timeframe through January 1679, all born at (East) Windsor, Connecticut:

  1. Samuel Grant, b. 20 Apr 1659
  2. Unknown Grant; died young
  3. John Grant, b. 24 Apr 1664
  4. Mathew Grant, b. 22 Sep 1666
  5. Josiah Grant, b. 19 Mar 1668
  6. Unknown Grant; died young
  7. Nathaniel Grant, b. 14 Apr 1672
  8. Mary Grant, b. 23 Jan 1675/76
  9. Sarah Grant, b. 19 Jan 1678/79; d. 1680

Mary (Porter) Grant passed away in 1681.

Burial 16 Dec 1681 Windsor, Hartford, Connecticut

Sources

  1. Holman, Winifred Lovering, "John Porter of Windsor" in The American Genealogist. New Haven, CT: D. L. Jacobus. New England Historic Genealogical Society. Vol. 16, 1939, pp. 49-52. AmericanAncestors.org($) (see Notes, p. 122)
  • Genealogical and Historical Record of the Vorce Family in the US, 1901




Is Mary your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of Mary's DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 2

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Porter-186 and Porter-159 appear to represent the same person because: Same parents, close birth year. Marriage on -186 is correct per History and Genealogy of Ancient Windsor. Please merge
posted by S (Hill) Willson
Porter-6437 and Porter-186 appear to represent the same person because: birth date & place, married surname, daughter Mary, all match
posted by Nan (Lambert) Starjak

P  >  Porter  |  G  >  Grant  >  Mary (Porter) Grant