Is Hannah your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Hannah by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Hannah:
~0.78%Deanna Lackaff :
AncestryDNA, GEDmatch T636388[compare], yourDNAportal DEAe6f0c2ac, Ancestry member SandhillsScribe
+
Family Tree DNA Family Finder, GEDmatch T636388[compare], yourDNAportal DEAe6f0c2ac, FTDNA kit #N68042
Thanks Mary Lou Knox McGalliard. With all the Marys- I better use full names.
The problem is not in the Biography. It is up higher, just under Hannah (Reid) Knox's name where in bold letters it has "Mother"- here it shows two Marys.
1. Mary (Knox) Bell born 1762
2. Mary (Knox) Brandon born 1771.
No sure why their are two Marys- maybe because of a merge? thanks
The problem is not in the Biography. It is up higher, just under Hannah (Reid) Knox's name where in bold letters it has "Mother"- here it shows two Marys.
1. Mary (Knox) Bell born 1762
2. Mary (Knox) Brandon born 1771.
No sure why their are two Marys- maybe because of a merge? thanks