no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

John Roberts (abt. 1500 - abt. 1556)

John Roberts
Born about in Burway, Shropshire, Englandmap
Son of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Husband of — married about 1518 in Ashford, Shropshire, Englandmap
Descendants descendants
Died about at about age 56 in Ashford, Shropshire, Englandmap
Problems/Questions
Profile last modified | Created 9 May 2011
This page has been accessed 1,225 times.
The Birth and Marriage Dates are a rough estimate. See the text for details.

Biography

Must have been born around 1500 given second son John born 1521-1525.

Research note

There has long been the suggestion that John Roberts of Burway in Shropshire was the same person as the John Roberts who obtained the lease of the property called Welches at Cowfold in Sussex for the rent of a rose. So far no evidence has been found.

The suggestion has gone on to assert that his son, Thomas Roberts of Bristol, is the same person as Thomas Roberts of Cowfold. Conveniently the Visitation of Shropshire has nothing to say about Thomas apart from his parentage. [1] However the Visitation of Gloucester supplies Thomas with a wife, Alice Crickland, and a life in Bristol.[2]

Until evidence is provided it is assumed that the Roberts of Burway in Shropshire are not the same family as the Roberts of Cowfold in Sussex.

Sources

  1. Visitation of Shropshire Page 128: Roberts of Bristol
  2. The visitation of the county of Gloucester, taken in the year 1623 by Chitting, Henry, d. 1638; College of Arms (Great Britain); Philipot, John, 1589?-1645; Camden, William, 1551-1623; Heane, William Crawshay, 1849- joint ed; Maclean, John, Sir, 1811-1895 Page 138: Roberts




Is John your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of John's DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 2

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Roberts-14543 and Roberts-1636 are not ready to be merged because: No evidence exists to link the Roberts of Shropshire to the Roberts of Sussex.
posted by C. Mackinnon
Roberts-14543 and Roberts-1636 appear to represent the same person because: same birth and son, need to determine the correct place names
posted by Robin Lee

Rejected matches › John Roberts (abt.1510-)