no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

James Rollins (1612 - 1687)

James Rollins aka Rawlins
Born in Cornwall, Dorset, Englandmap
Brother of
Husband of — married before 1643 [location unknown]
Descendants descendants
Died at about age 75 in Long Reach, Dover, (later Strafford County), New Hampshiremap
Profile last modified | Created 8 Jul 2011
This page has been accessed 3,838 times.
The Puritan Great Migration.
James Rollins migrated to New England during the Puritan Great Migration (1621-1640). (See Great Migration Begins, by R. C. Anderson, Vol. 3, p. 1552)
Join: Puritan Great Migration Project
Discuss: pgm
The Birth Date is a rough estimate. See the text for details.

Contents

Biography

James Rawlins (spelled "Rawlins" by Robert C. Anderson in his Great Migration series.)[1]

Uncertain Origin

Robert C. Anderson reports James Rawlins' origin is unknown.[1]

James Rawlins is assumed to have been born 1610 in Cornwall, England, son of James Rawlins and Sarah Beach.[citation needed]

Immigration

The date and arrival place for James Rawlins is unknown, but he must have arrived at New England by 1633, since he was made Freeman on 14 May 1634.[1] He is often claimed to have arrived at Ipswich by 1632, but, as Anderson points out, there is no evidence for this, although it is possible, "since Newbury was not established by the spring of 1634, Ipswich is a likely choice."[1]

Marriage

Wife: Hannah Frye,[2][3] (called Hannah Unknown by Anderson).[1]

Children

Children of James and Hannah, according to Robert C. Anderson:[1]

  1. Rebecca Rawlins, b say 1643; mar Isaac Stokes
  2. Icabod Rawlins (eldest son), b say 1645; Mary Tibbetts, daughter of Jeremiah Tibbetts
  3. Joseph Rawlins, b say 1647
  4. Elizabeth Rawlins, b say 1649; mar Obadiah Morse
  5. Samuel Rawlins, b say 1651; mar Rebecca Unknown (apparently Rebecca Pickering, daughter of John Pickering)
  6. (possibly) Sarah Rawlins, b say 1658; mar Philip Chesley
  7. Benjamin Rawlins, b about 1662

The above are the only documented children of James and Hannah. The following children were included in an 1874 genealogy, without citation:[4]

Thomas Rawlins
James Rawlins
Deborah Rawlins

Anderson notes that the 1874 genealogy by John R. Rollins includes children for James who actually belong in the next generation.[1]

Robert C. Anderson discusses Thomas Rawlins, who was briefly living at Dover in the early 1660s before removing to Exeter. Since he was taxed in 1662, he was presumably born by 1641, which would have made him older than Ichabod, who James called his eldest son in his will. Also, there is no known interaction between Thomas and James, or any of James' children, leading Anderson to believe Thomas was not a son of James Rawlins.[1]


Death and Legacy

On 15 December 1685, the day before he wrote his will, James deeded to his son, Samuel, some 43 acres, bounded on one end by the land of son, Ichabod and of son-in-law, Obadiah Mors.[1]

James wrote his will on 16 December 1685, at "my now dwelling house stands in Long Reach in Dover," (later Strafford County), New Hampshire.[1] He made as overseers his "trusty and true friends Mr. Henry Langstaff, Sr., & Obediah Mors[e] & Philip Chesly."[1] The will was proved on 25 July 1691.[1]

He died between the date of his will in 1685 and the apprenticeship of his son, Benjamin, on 13 August 1687 (in which his father is called deceased).[1]

Probate

James' Will gave property to his wife, Hannah, to his son, Ichabod (the oldest), to Benjamin, and to his “other children,” not named in the will.

Probate 1691-07-25. The will was proved. Obadiah Mors, of Strawberry Bank, was executor.

Property

1644-07-10 Land Grant, Dover, New Hampshire, USA

1656-11-26 Another grant of one hundred acres “ was layed out for him”, Dover, New Hampshire, USA

This last named lot is so accurately described, and the position and boundaries are so clearly defined, that the description is copied here for the benefit of descendants who may, in future, desire to visit the old place, and explore the paternal acres “Giuen and graunted unto James Rawlins, his heirs and assigns, one hundred acres of upland anext to his one lot, as so layed out and bounded, by Capt. Hall and Sargeant Hanson. who haue bounded it as followeth: that is to say, by the water sied I09 rodde ; upon the S. E. sied, 8o rodde; upon the N. W. sied, 24o rodde, upon a S. W. and by W. line; and the S. E. sied is upon a S. W. and by W. line. Layed 26th of IIth mo., 1656.” [Excerpt from Source]

Residence

1633 Among the pioneer settlers of Ipswich, Ipswich, Essex County, Massachusetts

1634 Newbury. Probably, one of a small party who went there for the purpose of looking out a favorable spot for settlement.

1644 Dover, New Hampshire

On 18 March 1648, James Rawlins was granted six acres, and in the Dover tax list of 19 December 1648, James paid £1 tax on his property valued at £60.[1] He purchased from James Johnson the house and land on the Long Reach, Dover.[1] James paid taxes on his property at the Bloody Point section of Dover, New Hampshire, beginning in 1677 until his death.[1]

Legal

Court 1634-08-05.

“It was witnessed upon oath ‘that James Rawlins took 8 pence per day, and meate and drinke for ten days worke, for one of his servants, for weeding corn, contrary to an order of Courte” (an act regulating the price of commodities and labor). “And therefore he is to pay 5 shillings for euery daye he hath soe transgressed.”

Court 1656-01-27.

“James Rawlins was presented for neglect of coming unto the publicke meeting, and admonished therefor, and sentenced to pay the fees of the Courte, two shillings and six pence.”

Court 1659-10-18 in Boston, Suffolk County, Massachusetts, USA.

“The Court hauing considered of the seuerall offences of those persons yt entertayned ye Quakers, with ye answers giuen in by them respectively, doe order that James Rawlins, being more innocent and ingenious than the rest, be only admonished by ye honnored Gouernor, wch was donne.”

Sources

  1. 1.00 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.06 1.07 1.08 1.09 1.10 1.11 1.12 1.13 1.14 1.15 Anderson, Robert Charles, "James Rawlins: Featured Name." The Great Migration Begins: Immigrants to New England 1620-1633, Volumes I-III. (Pages 1552-55) (Online database accessed December 26, 2015: AmericanAncestors.org, New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2010)
  2. Torrey, Clarence Almon. Torrey’s New England Marriages Prior to 1700 (Genealogical Publishing Co., Inc. Baltimore, 1985) Page 612.
  3. James Rawlins & Hannah Frye marriage record
  4. John R Rollins, Records of the families of the name Rawlins or Rollins in the United States, Lawrence, MA: G.S> Merrill & Crocker, printers (1874), p 4.




Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of James's DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 13

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Can someone with an Ancestry.com subscription check the two references for a marriage to Hannah Frye. When I consult the Torrey entry on AmericanAncestors.org the entry seems to be for Thomas Rawlins and Hannah Frye, not James. The entry for James, like Anderson lists only a marriage to Hannah ________. Wondering if it was misread or if it's a version issue.

Thanks.

posted by M Cole
The Ancestry image shows her as Hannah _______. However, it is referenced as Hannah Frye in the Torrey document shared by an Ancestry Member nine years ago. The member has her in their tree as Hannah Frye, with a birth year of 1617 in Weymouth, Dorset, England, unsourced.
posted by S (Hill) Willson
Hannah Frye marrying James or Thomas?

But basically there is no marriage record for James Rawlins and Hannah Frye.

posted by M Cole
Sorry. Marrying James Rawlins in Ipswich, Newbury or Dover, based on a birth of a child in "1640?"
posted by S (Hill) Willson
We need to attend to the three children still attached that Anderson disputes. See narrative. I started to detach them, but then realized I don't have time to figure out where they belong. Anderson says they are part of the next generation, but where? The 1874 genealogy of the Rawlins/Rollins family is clearly wrong about the three extra children.
posted by Jillaine Smith
Just flagging this for PGM as this still needs attending to (3 undocumented children still attached).
posted by Jillaine Smith
The Torrey cite sends you to Google Books. The Ancestry link is the same page, and could be removed. The info for the wife is Hannah/Anna (Frye?) so the Unknown might be better. Also, DOB for Hannah is 1640, making Thomas 32 years older.
posted by Bob Keniston Jr.
We need a better source for Frye as the maiden name of his wife. Anderson says Unknown. The source link for the marriage goes to Ancestry. Would someone with a membership there please transcribe the record? Thanks.
posted by Jillaine Smith
Since Great Migration Begins gives no names for parents and no place for birth, I recommend that the parents be detached with a note left in the biography. Further I recommend that the place of birth be removed, with only England left in the blank.

Thank you.

66 years older than wife??
posted by Vincent Piazza
UNKNOWN-189645 and Rollins-145 appear to represent the same person because: UNKNOWN-189645 should not be unknown. His name was Rawlins or Rollins and he is the same as Rollins-145.
posted by Henry Chadwick
Rollins-658 and Rollins-145 appear to represent the same person because: Biographical details match.
posted by Henry Chadwick
Rawlins-156 and Rollins-145 appear to represent the same person because: Same name, spouse, and approx dates