no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Claas Rosa (bef. 1684)

Claas (Niclaas) "Nicolaes, Nicholas" Rosa aka Roosa
Born before in Kingston, Ulster County, Province of New Yorkmap
Ancestors ancestors
Husband of — married 18 Dec 1720 in NYmap
Descendants descendants
Died [date unknown] in Kingston, Ulster County, New Yorkmap
Profile last modified | Created 28 Jun 2017
This page has been accessed 385 times.
{{{image-caption}}}
Niclaas Rosa was a New Netherland Descendant 1674-1776.
Join: New Netherland Settlers Project
Discuss: new_netherland

Contents

Biography

Claas (Niclaas) was baptized on 27 April 1684 in the Reformed Dutch Church of Kingston, New York, recorded as the son of Heyman Rosa and Margriet Rosevelt (Heyman Aldertse Roosa and Anna Margaret Roosevelt). No witnesses are named in the record.[1]

He is the husband of Zara Rutsz and the father of Marretjen Roosa who was baptized in Kingston on 26 February 1721, when the witnesses were Johannes Rutsz and Marretjen Hansen.[2]

He is named in the will of his father, Heyman Roosa of Hurley, Ulster County, created on 23 August 1708. The will names children Allert; Nicolaes; Gysbert; Jannettie, wife of Philipp Hooghtylingh; Wyntie; wife of William Crom; Ragel and Lea. Real and Personal estate. Executors were the 3 sons. Witnesses were Jan Roosa, Mattys Low, Jacobus van Netten and Wm. Nottingham. Probate 9 September. [3]

Church Records

Baptism
  • 1684 Apr 27 Claas - Heyman Rosa, Margriet Rosevelt. [1]
Children's baptisms
  1. 16 February 1726 Marretjen, parents Niclaas Roosa, Zara Rutsz. Witnesses Johannes Rutsz, Marretjen Hansen. [2]

Research Notes

LNAB

Rosa is the surname recorded for Claas' father at Claas' baptism. Quackenbush-118 16:58, 28 June 2017 (EDT)

Sources

  1. 1.0 1.1 Hoes, page 21, #365.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Hoes, page 134
  3. Page 317 Calendar of Wills https://ia802703.us.archive.org/27/items/calendarofwillso01ferna/calendarofwillso01fern.pdf

Acknowledgements

  • This person was created through the import of 124-DeCoursey.ged on 14 September 2010.
  • WikiTree profile Roosa-181 created through the import of LJM Family File 10.1.ged on Oct 28, 2012 by Vivian Kahn.
  • Thanks to John Ellis for starting this profile.



  • Son: Claas
  • Parents: Heyman Rosa and Margriet Rosevelt
  • Witnesses: [No Witnesses names].
  • Date of Baptism: 27 April 1684
  • Place of Baptism: Kingston Old Dutch Reformed Church, at Kingston, Ulster County, NY
  • Baptism No.: 365
  • Page No.: 21
  • See uploaded page
  • Book Website: https://archive.org/details/baptismalmarriag00king/page/20




Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of Niclaas's DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 8

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Thank you Em, I tried as well and it worked so they are merged now.

Have a wonderful day !

Bea :)

posted by Bea (Timmerman) Wijma
I'm unable to complete the merge. I think it's a glitch in my browser or something. I went over all the info and was prepared to confirm, but when I click confirm merge it just stalls out. Will try again later.
posted by Em (Kopp) Laetsch
Hi both,

I have repropoposed the merge with some explaing about the LNAB,(see merge proposal PPP profile)

Hope it helps and greets from the Netherlands,

Bea :)

posted by Bea (Timmerman) Wijma
Roosa-467 and Rosa-303 appear to represent the same person because:

Hi,

These are the same and they can be merged.

And noticing the posts about the LNAB and if it was Roosa or Rosa and to explain it a bit more, for New Netherland Settlers, the LNAB is determined by looking at the earliest record of a person and how the last name (of the parent/father) was written in this record, for Claas there's a baptism record (see source) and the last name was written as Rosa, so that's the correct LNAB and that's why the Rosa profile is PPP't, so all duplicates are merged into the PPP profile. If other records show variants of the last name those variants are added as other last name or, if someone used one of those variants pretty consistent and in the last record, that version can be added to the current last name field.

Hope it explains things a bit more and many thanks in advance,

Greets from the Netherlands, Bea :)

posted by Bea (Timmerman) Wijma
HI,

Claas Roosa Roosa-514 and Nicholas Rosa Rosa-303 have been marked as Unmerged Matches for now, they are the same and have to be merged, but duplicate mothers first have to be merged and when they are merged these can be merged as well.

Greets and many thanks for the help in advance,

Bea :)

posted by Bea (Timmerman) Wijma
I'm all in agreement and appreciative of your efforts and contributions. Thanks, Tammy!

-Em

posted by Em (Kopp) Laetsch
Rosa-303 and Roosa-467 are not ready to be merged because: copy of reply to merge request: I agree that this is the same person. Roosa, however, is the correct lnab proved by several records. Rosa-303 should be mergied into Roosa-467 and transferring any extra or relevent data. Ive created an unmerged match. They are PP so this needs an approval by an authorized person. I think Roosa-467 should be the name used regardless of later generation name modifications. The sources are already cited. I changed Claas to Niclaas as proper name.

I added: "This sources validates the "Roosa" name variant as legitimate. "De Herwijnse Ro(o)sa’s en de herkomst van hun familienaam door Engel Roza" or "The Herwijnse Ro (o) sa and the origin of their family name by Engel Roza" "[1] " This was fun. Thanks Em! What do you think? Tammy

posted by Tamara Flora
Roosa-467 and Rosa-303 appear to represent the same person because: Same people, places, dates, etc. Duplicate profile
posted by Em (Kopp) Laetsch

Rejected matches › Nicholas Roosa (1718-abt.1778)