no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Mary (Samford) Webb (abt. 1650 - 1682)

Mary Webb formerly Samford aka Sanford
Born about in Old Rappahannock, Colony of Virginiamap
Ancestors ancestors
Wife of — married 14 Jul 1673 in N Farnham Parish, Richmond, Virginiamap
Descendants descendants
Died at about age 32 in Old Rappahannock, Colony of Virginiamap
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Carol Wilkerson private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 16 Aug 2014
This page has been accessed 1,590 times.

Biography

Father James Samford, b. 1624, d. 2 Nov 1704, North Farnham Parish, Richmond County, Virginia - Probate (Age 80 years)
Mother Mary MNU Samford, d. Aft 1665, North Farnham Parish, Old Rappahannock County, Virginia

Spouse

John Webb, b. Bef 1653, Old Rappahannock County, Virgina d. 2 Mar 1697/98, North Farnham Parish, Richmond County, Virginia - Probate (Age > 45 years) Married 14 Jul 1673 North Farnham Parish, Richmond County, Virginia

Children

  1. James Webb, b. 9 Aug 1673, North Farnham Parish, Richmond County, Virginia d. 15 Jan 1716/17, South Farnham Parish, Essex County, Virginia - Probate (Age 43 years)
  2. Giles Webb, b. 15 Apr 1677, North Farnham Parish, Richmond County, Virginia d. 3 May 1732, North Farnham Parish, Richmond County, Virginia - Probate (Age 55 years)
  3. Isaac Webb, b. 18 Dec 1681, North Farnham Parish, Richmond County, Virginia d. 17 Feb 1728/29, Essex County, Virginia - Probate (Age 47 years)


Sources


  • Virginia Marriages, 1785-1940," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:V29M-BGS : 5 December 2014), John Webb and Mary Samford, 14 Jul 1673; citing North Farnham Parish,Richmond,Virginia, reference ; FHL microfilm 975.523 V2K.
  • judy sanders Family Web Site

    MyHeritage.com family tree

    Family site: Family Web Site

    Family tree: 144695931-1 Discovery Media: 144695931-1 Certainty: 3 26 JUL 2015 Added via an Instant Discovery™ Event: Discovery
  • Book of Webb's ( Webb's in America)




Is Mary your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Mary by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Mary:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 5

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Sanford-5774 and Samford-61 appear to represent the same person because: same parents, spouse and many duplicate children
posted by Robin Lee
Sanford-5774 and Samford-61 do not represent the same person because: Too many children, no way she could have had that many children
posted by [Living Webb]
Sanford-5774 and Samford-61 are not ready to be merged because: Children and death dates
posted by [Living Anthony]
Sanford-5774 and Samford-61 appear to represent the same person because: now ready for merge previously proposed
posted by Robin Lee
Sanford-2425 and Samford-61 appear to represent the same person because: Samford-61 is correct please merge thank you
posted by Andrea (Stawski) Pack

S  >  Samford  |  W  >  Webb  >  Mary (Samford) Webb