Samuel Sanford, son of Samuel Sanford and Esther Baldwin; born in Milford, Connecticut, on April 1, 1703/04; and died approx. 1758.[1]
m. Hannah Gilbert
His inventory was completed on 30 April 1758 in Newtown and recorded in Danbury. Thomas Sanford and Amos Sanford were the administrators of his estate.[2]
In 1758, his estate distribution was ordered to be distributed to his widow Hannah, Thomas Sanford (eldest son), Amos Sanford, Hezekiah Sanford, Samuel Sanford, Sarah, wife of Josiah Platt, and Lois Sanford.[3]
Burial
Newtown Village Cemetery, Newtown, Fairfield, Connecticut
"Connecticut, Vital Records, Prior to 1850," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:QP9X-JGGQ : 21 September 2019), Samuel Sanford, ; citing Death, , Compiled by Lucius A. and Lucius B. Barbour, housed at State Library, Hartford, Connecticut; FHL microfilm 008272244.
Is Samuel your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Samuel by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA.
Y-chromosome DNA test-takers in his direct paternal line on WikiTree:
Stanford-505 and Sanford-1760 appear to represent the same person because: they match birth, death, and marriage information. Sanford is the correct LNAB supported by sources.
This profile, Stanford-505, is a duplicate with Sanford-1760. I am initiating a merge from this profile, as 'Sanford' is the correct LNAB to carry forward.
This profile, Sanford-1760, is a duplicate with Stanford-505. While the LNAB’s are different, 'Sanford' is the correct LNAB. Because of the name difference, I am initiating the merge from Stanford-505 to allow it to merge into this one so the correct LNAB will carry forward.
I believe his last name is Sanford, rather than Stanford, and may have been a typo when the profile was created. Could a correction to the LNAB field be done to correct this?