Place: Dutch Reformed Church, Freehold and Middletown, Monmouth, New Jersey.
Church Records
19 March 1710 Name Rachel Schenk Gender Female Record Type Baptism Baptism Date 19 Mar 1710 Baptism Place Freehold and Middletown, Monmouth, New Jersey, Father Jan Schenk Mother Sara Kowenoven. No wits. [5]
Source: S-1876225910 Title: U.S., Sons of the American Revolution Membership Applications, 1889-1970 Author: Ancestry.com Publication: Online publication - Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2011.Original data - Sons of the American Revolution Membership Applications, 1889-1970. Louisville, Kentucky: National Society of the Sons of the American Revolution. Microfilm, 508 rolls.
Jerry Lee Roley, Brøderbund Software, Inc., World Family Tree Vol. 1, Ed. 1, (Release date: November 29, 1995), "CD-ROM," Tree #4571, Date of Import: Jan 16, 1999. "Electronic," Date of Import: May 8, 1999.
Source: S500003 Dale Dailey Dailey-Snell Family Web Site
MyHeritage family tree
Family site: Dailey-Snell Family Web Site
Family tree: 183944272-4 Discovery Media: 183944272-4 Rachel Janse VanCleave (born Schenck) Certainty: 3 21 OCT 2017 Added via a Person Discovery Event: Discovery
Acknowledgments
WikiTree profile Schenck-214 created through the import of DerrekPrestonWayneSteeleFamily.ged on Oct 14, 2011 by Preston Steele.
WikiTree profile Van Cleave-76 created through the import of DerrekPrestonWayneSteeleFamily.ged on Oct 14, 2011 by Preston Steele.
Is Rachel your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Rachel by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Rachel:
Schenck-424 and Schenck-214 appear to represent the same person because: Definitely the same person. Hadn't seen Schenck-214 when creating Schenck-424.
And just looking at the Changes page, I can see that this is another one that got the proper NAB Schenck completely ruined in a merge as recently as just this week. Again, the vast majority of this family line in trees that I have studied and compiled over decades has this family name in most branckes, ancestors and descendants, almost always as Schenck, not Schenk. Frankly, Schenck is one of the more consistently stable surnames among the New Netherlands groups. So seeing this "Schenk" variant pattern taking over recklessly in WikiTree is disconcerting.