no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

James Scott (abt. 1705 - abt. 1749)

James Scott
Born about in Londonderry, Co., Londonderry, Ulster Province, Irelandmap
Ancestors ancestors
Brother of [half]
Husband of — married 24 Apr 1722 [location unknown]
Descendants descendants
Died about at about age 44 in Cecil, Marylandmap [uncertain]
Profile last modified | Created 8 Apr 2011
This page has been accessed 1,439 times.

Biography

James Scott has Irish ancestors.


James is buried at Norwalk, Fairfield, Connecticut [1]

In 1750, his son William Scott being of lawful age made the choice of his brother James Scott of Ridgefield as his guardian. And his son John Scott, being of lawful age, made the choice of his mother Hannah.[2]

James was born in 1705. He passed away about 1750.

Sources

  1. A source for this information is needed.
  2. “Probate records v. 1-3 1744-1782”, database with images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-892K-TF1W : 17 February 2023), FHL microfilm 007627321, image 214, Danbury, Fairfield, Connecticut, Vol 2, 1745-1775, Pages 24.

SECONDARY SOURCE: https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/details/L6BF-P8H

  • Family records




Is James your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with James by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with James:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 4

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Scott-47245 and Scott-1773 appear to represent the same person because: they are the same
posted by Tim Dowling
Scott-18482 and Scott-1773 appear to represent the same person because: Same spouse and child
I don't think James was married to Elizabeth. Unless someone has another source, she should probably be disconnected.
posted by Abby (Brown) Glann
Daughter Abigail would have been born before James' marriage to Hannah. I do not think she is his daughter, and should be disconnected unless a source is given.
posted by Abby (Brown) Glann

S  >  Scott  >  James Scott