no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Henry Short (abt. 1642 - 1675)

Henry Short
Born about in Walberton, Sussex, Englandmap
Ancestors ancestors
[sibling(s) unknown]
Husband of — married 1662 in Englandmap
Descendants descendants
Died at about age 33 in Walberton, Sussex, Englandmap
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Christa Vassillière private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 4 Jul 2011
This page has been accessed 2,181 times.

Biography

The frequently seen christening or birth date seen of 25 Mar 1642 is incorrect. It is the christening for an Adam Short who is son of Henry and Elizabeth Short.[1][2] There is a Walberton, Sussex christening record for a Henry Short, son of Henry and Elizabeth, who was born 1647 (see Research Notes) and a Henry, son of Thomas and Agnes, who was born 1641.

Children

Miriam Short
Ann Short
Adam Short
Marriage:  : Date: 1664 : Place: Sussex, England[citation needed]

Henry is believed to have passed away in 1675 based upon an index of probate records at Sussex: Chichester - Calendar of Wills in the Consistory Court of the Bishop of Chichester, 1482-1800[3] However, there is as yet no documentation that this record is that of this Henry.

Death: Date: 15 APR 1674, Place: Ford, Sussex, England[2]

Research Notes

If christened as a child, the Henry of 1647 would have been only 17 years of age at the documented birth of Miriam. Young for the period but not unseen.

Henry Short bap 9 May 1647, Walberton, Sussex, Father: Henry; Mother: Elizabeth [4] [5]

Henry Short bap 20 Jun 1641, Walberton, Sussex, Father: Thomas; Mother: Agnes [6] [7]

Henry Short bap 1 Mar 1634, Walberton, Sussex, Father: John; Mother: unknown https://www.findmypast.com/transcript?id=R_864118478

As of 16 Jan 2019 a marriage record has not been located in any parish registers or published indices of marriage licenses.

Sources

  1. "England Births and Christenings, 1538-1975," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:N5XC-T5M : 11 February 2018, Adam Short, 25 Mar 1642); citing , index based upon data collected by the Genealogical Society of Utah, Salt Lake City; FHL microfilm 416,750, 416,755, 918,474.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Source: #S255 Ancestry.com. OneWorldTree : http://trees.ancestry.com/pt/AMTCitationRedir.aspx?tid=6676093&pid=-1250177401 NOTE: link is invalid 16 Jan 2019 and the reference is to the invalid date of birth
  3. UK, Extracted Probate Records, 1269-1975 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2009. Wills Now Preserved in the Probate Registry at Chichester.
  4. https://www.findmypast.com/transcript?id=R_957911051
  5. "England, Sussex, Parish Registers, 1538-1910", database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:Q2QQ-MWXW : 11 March 2018), Henry Short, 1647. Transcript [1] Original document [2]
  6. https://www.findmypast.com/transcript?id=R_957911050
  7. "England, Sussex, Parish Registers, 1538-1910", database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:Q2QQ-MCL3 : 11 March 2018), Henry Short, 1641. Transcript of original [3] Image of original document [4]






Is Henry your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Henry by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Henry:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 2

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
I see his name as being Adam Henry Short on the following website: http://gw.geneanet.org/chatfhs?langfr&pzcolin+john&nzchatfield&ocz0&p=adam+henry&

nshort&oc0&type=tree

posted by Darlene Bora
Short-654 and Short-604 appear to represent the same person because: I'm pretty sure Henry Short is not a real person, and the wikigeneologist who made Henry confused him with Adam.
posted by Christa Vassillière

Rejected matches › Adam Short

S  >  Short  >  Henry Short