Catherine Perinne Simon was born about 1742 in New Orleans, Louisiana, New France.
She married Jean Baptiste Lemoine on 20 May 1760 at Pointe Coupee, Louisiana.[1]
Research Notes
See her son's marriage record for the possibility that her name was Catherine Lafleur. [Which son?]
Some of the children linked to this profile appear to be duplicates. All of their children should be reviewed and validated.
Two different death dates appear in this profile. The date of about 1792 in Pointe Coupee was entered in the data fields. The date of 5 January 1778 in Avoyelles, Louisiana was entered in the biography. Which is it?
Sources
↑Diocese of Baton Rouge Catholic Church Records ("DOBR"): Pointe Coupee Records, 1722-1769, volume 1b (Diocese of Baton Rouge Archives: Baton Rouge, La., 2002), p. 170;
Catherine SIMON (Andre Simon, decd., and Marie Anne VALLO) of New Orleans, m. 20 May 1760, Jean Baptiste LEMOINE (Guillaume Lemoine and Marie [omitted], decd.) of this parish wit. Sarazin; Lafleur; Antoine Provost (PCP-1,209) also (PCP-3,67)
Is Catherine your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Catherine by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Catherine:
Simon-2924 and Simon-1195 appear to represent the same person because: Same spouse, same approximate dates. Simon-2924 is unsourced and lacks other information, but the information that is there does align.
Simon-2047 and Simon-1195 appear to represent the same person because: I was directed to new information on RootsWeb that led me to realizing these profiles represent the same person. Match seems clear.
Simon-1445 and Simon-1195 are not ready to be merged because: Death date needs to be reconciled
HOWEVER that does not seem to be true as one is BEFORE and that matches the other date so they are consistent us actual date in merge