She married John Riley in 1814 and lived by Port Elgin, Tidnish, New Brunswick.
In the 1861 census she was living in the parish of Botsford, New Brunswick with her son John, a farmer age 37 and a daughter Elizabeth age 23. [2]
In 1881 she lived in the home of her daughter Catherine Chappell in Amherst Shore, Nova Scotia. [3]
Research Notes
An alternative suggestion is that Mary was born on P.E.I. in 1795 and came to New Brunswick with her parents in 1799. On the death of her husband she removed to Port Elgin and finally to Tidnish and died in 1885 at the ripe age of ninety. No Source given.
Need evidence to support:
She had 13 children, including a son that was Chief of Boston's Fire Dept.
She passed away in 1885.
Sources
↑ Harold Simpson, Cavendish, Its History, Its People (N.p.: n.p., 1973), chapter 11, page 103.
↑ 1861 census of New Brunswick, New Brunswick, Botsford, p. 32, Mary Riley; RG 31; digital images, Ancestry (accessed 16 Mar 2022); citing Library and Archives Canada microfilm C-1006.
↑ 1881 census of Canada, New Brunswick, district 22, sub-district 66, Amherst Shore, p. 27, dwelling 108, family 118, Mary Riley; RG 31; digital images, Ancestry (accessed 16 Mar 2022); citing Library and Archives Canada microfilm C-13176.
History of Botsford, (A Parish of Westmorland County, New Brunswick, Canada, with genealogical sketches of 68 families) by W.M. Burns, second printing 1962. Page 92 - 93.
1851 Westmorland County Census, Family # 1539, Botsford Parish.
Reily, Mary, Female, Wife, age 56, Scotch, Farming
Reily, John, Male, Son, age 26,
Reily, Catherine, Female, Daughter, age 24,
Reily, James, Male, Son, age 19
Reily, Christina, Female, Daughter, age 17
Reily, George, Male, Son, age 15
Reily, Elizabeth, Female, Daughter, age 12
Is Mary your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Mary by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Mary: