no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Thomas Smith IV (1683 - 1729)

Thomas Smith IV
Born in Ipswich, Essex, Massachusetts Baymap
Husband of — married 13 Jul 1704 in Ipswich, Essex, Massachusetts Bay Colonymap
Descendants descendants
Died at age 46 in Ipswich, Essex, Massachusetts Baymap
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Roland Goodwin private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 6 Jun 2011
This page has been accessed 1,502 times.

Biography

Ancestor of yDNA Group 5 in SmithConnections.com DNA Project


"[Smith,] Thomas, son of John, Jr., Apr. 24, 1683. CT.R."[1]

[Smith,] Thomas [4th, s. John. int.], and Eliza[beth] Emins, July 13, 1704.* Intention also recorded.[2]

Source

  1. Vital Records of Ipswich, Massachusetts to the End of the Year 1849. Vol. I, Births, p. 345. "[Smith,] Thomas, son of John, Jr., Apr. 24, 1683. CT.R."
  2. Vital Records of Ipswich, Massachusetts to the End of the Year 1849. Vol. II, Marriages, p. 400. [Smith,] Thomas [4th, s. John. int.], and Eliza[beth] Emins, July 13, 1704.* Intention also recorded




Is Thomas your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Thomas by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Thomas:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 8

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Smith-170116 and Smith-15304 appear to represent the same person because: Birthdate and birthplace exactly the same.

The same wife (surname has a variation in spelling)

posted by Miguel Kelley
This Thomas Smith of Ipswich [Smith-15304] (SON of JOHN) b.1683 was conflated with Thomas Smith of Sudbury [Smith-197377] (SON of THOMAS) b. 1679. They are 2 different men, in 2 different towns in 2 different counties who both married women named Elizabeth. The Sudbury man's dates of birth and death are in the Sudbury VR, as are his twelve children. His wife's surname is unknown. Furthermore, his 1st daughter was b. 15 Apr 1704. The Ipswich VR date for Thomas Smith IV [Smith-15304] and Elizabeth Emins' marriage is 13 Jul 1704. The father of Thomas of Ipswich was John. Therefore, Thomas Smith and Abigail Rice are NOT the Ipswich man's parents. See my notes for Bathsheba Smith [Smith-15292] (daughter of Thomas Smith II of Sudbury) for documentation.
posted by Diane (Wilson) Flynn
"Half" brother Thomas Smith "II" is a duplicate.
posted by Kim Williams
Smith-96797 and Smith-15304 appear to represent the same person because: Clear duplicate
posted by Rick Williams
What about Thomas Smith III, Smith 28600, supposedly the brother of Thos Smith IV Smith-28595, but their lifespans overlap?
Brothers Thos. Smith III and Thos. Smith IV. lifespans overlapping, suggest something wrong but haven't had time to look into it. -P.Smith
Smith-28595 and Smith-15304 are not ready to be merged because: Mother's do not match
posted by Sally Stovall

S  >  Smith  >  Thomas Smith IV