Ancestry.com has both my data, and the original work of Virginia Garber, her data is so mixed up it it makes no sense. I spent over a year deciphering what she did and verifying with sources. Working with Armistead's here and in England.
Please remove any sources that use Ancestry.com !
Event
Type: DNA Link
Sources
Extracts from North Farnham Parish Register kept in the clerk's office at Warsaw
Source: Garber, Virginia Armistead "The Armistead Family (1635-1910)." Whittet & Shepperson, Printers, Richmond 1910. The original was full of errors due to its poor organization. It has been reorganized and corrected by: Douglas E. Zimmerman, 2002-2004.
Virginia County Records> Volume VI> Page 98, Northampton County Marriage Bonds [1]
29 October 1715: Francis Armistead, of Gloucester, and Sarah Smith
Acknowledgement
Smith-57825 was created by Robert Stuckenborg through the import of Stuckenborg_Stinnett_10_gen.ged on Jan 26, 2014.
Is Sarah your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Sarah by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Sarah: