Place: Robben Island, [Cape Town], Cabo de Goede Hoop [2]
Events
Hans Christoffel Snijder (Dutch version of Schneider) also known as Snijman from Heidelberg in the Palatinate, was a soldier in the VOC garrison, convicted and banished to Robben Island on 30th July 1667 for not standing guard. Instead he had been sleeping on a regular basis with Groote Catrijn, washerwomanto successive commanders in the laundry at the Fort. Thereafter, Snijders disappears from the records at the Cape. On instructions from the Council of India, Groote Catrijn was again pardoned. This pardon may be a reference to her being banished to the Cape for murdering her rapist, Claes van Malabar, in 1656 in Palicatta (Pulicat), India [7]
Cristoffel Snyman who was baptised on 09 March 1669 became the stamvader of the Snyman family in Southern Africa. [2]
03 October 1665
Soldiers Hans Christoffel Snijman (from Heidelberg [Palatinate]) & Deteloff Tim fight ... Snijman & Tim are convicted & sentenced. The Council of Justice is satisfied that Snijman antagonised & hit a fellow soldier Diedeloff Tim who retaliated by stabbing Snijman. Both Tim & Snijman are tried separately & punished. Tim is banished to Robben Island for six months retaining his wages, but forfeiting his daily allowance. He also has to pay his victim's medical costs and a fine of two months' salary to be forfeited to the fiscal. Snijman, in turn, is fined three reals-of-eight to be forfeited to the fiscal ... [Mansell Upham] [9]
Research Notes
Viking Blood at the Cape? DNA Evidence confirms European paternity of Christoffel Snijman van der Caep and debunks theory he was the son of Anthonij van Bengale, Delia Robertson [10]
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Hans Christoffel by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Hans Christoffel:
Thank you. I think I fell into the trap that many novice genealogist do - becoming overexcited, and carried away - just today I was able to link Christoffel Snijman to Charlemagne!!! Wow! And then easy to lose sight of the need for detail with the ordinary people. Something I am coming to realise is that it is easier to find evidence for "greater" people. The search for details on 'less' significant figures can be difficult, but are important in linking time and peoples.
[following from the box below] 4) We upload as much 'evidence' in the form of photo's / transcripts to the profile itself and a final LNAB is decided and the variations AKA'd 5) I send a mail to Liz with the full url and she Project Protect the Profile (which means that all the duplicate profiles will have to go into this target profile).
Keep in mind that I concurrently have to keep an eye on around at least 1000 profiles and merge proposals. All of them need to get to the stage of PPP first before we start creating narratives.
Narratives is in this project therefore only at the end of the research on the LNAB, when as much of the 'facts' have been collated.
Baie dankie vir jou inset Evan. Ek het gevra of hulle jou mede-manager wil maak van hierdie profiel.
One big, huge apology (askies) to Evan and a very big thank you. A few lessons I learned in editing this biography. I made a few errors myself (have corrected them now). As I wrote to Evan in a private mail: 1) We first collect all the data and information and bits from here and there, with a healthy amount of distrust - not all data is valid - nonetheless we collect it. 2) Then we create order in the bio and do it so that we know who did what when and if need be why - at this stage we do not yet wipe the junk from GEDCOM, just trim it slightly - it still holds clues. 3) We find the primary sources for the LNAB - we know that he came from the Palatinate and was probably called 'Schneider' - that would be the LNAB but finding a baptismal record might be impossible so we turn to the shipping lists as Evan already suggested (on the resources page of this project). Those names might be in Dutch but it will be the nearest best thing (of course we can a search in Germany as well).
Evan, the van Bengals, van Palliacates, van Kormandels should not be our priority now. There were more than one Catharina. It is tricky, let's first focus on those profiles that give us the most problems, i.e. the Huguenots. As the slaves go, the site below (Delia's) is the most authoritative, but still incomplete. Let us first please just find the most correct spelling for the le Roux, des Prez, etc. and then the rest will follow. What we need is to find evidence - records - photocopied or transcribed or citations. As for removing merge proposals in the comment boxes, no, not yet - it gives an indication of the time line of the merges and their proposals. What we need to do is first find ALL the data and not start interpreting and make hasty decisions. Please - this profile still has duplicates out there, as do the Catharina's.
Definitely need to resolve the Catharina va Paliacatte / van Bengal issue. Data shows that there was only one slave Catharina at the Cape at that time.
Warning: Check the dates.
(pas nadat al die ander stappe gevolg is).
Keep in mind that I concurrently have to keep an eye on around at least 1000 profiles and merge proposals. All of them need to get to the stage of PPP first before we start creating narratives.
Narratives is in this project therefore only at the end of the research on the LNAB, when as much of the 'facts' have been collated.
Baie dankie vir jou inset Evan. Ek het gevra of hulle jou mede-manager wil maak van hierdie profiel.
groetnis,
Philip