no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Constance (Unknown) Doane (abt. 1645 - bef. 1682)

Constance [uncertain] Doane formerly [surname unknown]
Born about in Plymouth Colony, New Englandmap
Daughter of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]
Wife of — married about 1665 (to before 1682) in Plymouth Colony, New Englandmap
Descendants descendants
Died before before about age 37 in Eastham, Plymouth Colony, New Englandmap
Profile last modified | Created 20 Jun 2013
This page has been accessed 751 times.

Contents

Biography

Genealogical Controversy

Constance, the 1st wife of Daniel Doane (abt.1636-bef.1712), and mother of several of his children, has been the object of several genealogical controversies. She was long believed to have been the daughter of Nicholas Snow and Constance Hopkins Snow and to have been born shortly after their move from Plymouth to the new Cape Cod settlement of Eastham, Plymouth Colony, in 1644/45. Records were not well kept in this new town, as it was just being formed, but some Snow genealogies say Nicholas & Constance Snow had a daughter who lived, born in 1645/1646, in Barnstable County, Plymouth Colony (later Massachusetts) although no documents confirm her first name.

See Research Notes below for the most-recent (2019) DNA research that indicates she was not the daughter of Constance (Hopkins) Snow. Even this study is not without controversy. [1]

Some genealogists say this daughter was named Hannah; others say Constance. No woman named "Hannah Snow" has ever been proven to be a daughter of Nicholas and Constance Hopkins Snow either, although the name "Hannah" was common in the Snow family. In the General Society of Mayflower Descendants, "Mayflower Families Genealogies in Progress: Stephen Hopkins" Volume: pp 4-5, it states: "Josiah Paine, town clerk and historian of Harwich [in the 1800s,] wrote that Constance [Snow] had a daughter named for her mother who was the first wife of [Dr.] Daniel Doane of Eastham." This is the only local source, plus a statement by Governor Wm. Bradford in 1651 that does not name the 12 living Snow children, that leads to the conclusion that Dr. Doane's wife, Constance, was born as Constance Snow.[2][3]

Equally controversial was Constance's marriage in about 1666 when she was 20 or 21 years old. Josiah Paine, a Snow brother-in-law, and a Harwich town clerk & historian, about 200 years after the facts, kept a private notebook in which he recorded "Constance Doane" as being Constance and Nicholas Snow's daughter who married their neighbor, Dr. Daniel Doane. However, no marriage certificate has been found in Eastham town records. The Barnstable County Courthouse, where other local records from the colonial period were kept, burned in 1827, limiting what remains available.

What is confirmed is that Dr. Daniel Doane and his wife, Constance (Unknown), had a son: Daniel Doane, born in 1666 and then twins, born March 7, 1669, named "Constant" and "Constance," but the Mayflower Descendants Society has never accepted the twins' descendants as Mayflower families due to the lack of official marriage documentation. The same is true for several other Doane children born before Daniel's second marriage (to Hepzibah Cole Crisp, married after 28 July 1682, when her first husband, George Crisp, died).[4]

It can be presumed that Constance (Unknown) Doane died between the birth of her last child (Nathaniel Doane) in 1680 and Dr. Daniel Doane's 2nd marriage in July 1682. Again, no official death record has been found. Thus, at present, Constance (Unknown) Doane's identity as a child of Constance & Nicholas Snow is confirmed only by Josiah Paine's local private notation nearly 200 years after the facts. This was not enough for the General Society of Mayflower Descendants which rejected Constance Doane's descendants' claims in 1948 and holds to that rejection today.

Note after a Merge: On one profile, from "Kathys_Nelsons.ged," Constance Doane's death was given as December 22, 1690. This may have been a typo for "December 22, 1680," a real possibility as her last child was born in 1680 and many women then died in childbirth or shortly thereafter. As no sources were given for this date, we have preferred using "before July 1682" as the given death date.[5]

Research Notes

The Mayflower Quarterly, Fall 2019, page 40 has a report by Muriel Curits Cushing (who at that time was the Historian for the Florida Society of Mayflower Descendants). Through the women of the Mayflower Descendants project, multiple matrilineal (all-female line) descendants of Constance (Hopkins) Snow were confirmed. Several were full mtDNA (mitochondrial DNA - female to female) tested. The results indicated that Constance (Hopkins) Snow's DNA is in Haplogroup V.

Subsequently, two matrilineal female descendants of Dr. Daniel Doane (with his 1st wife Constance - supposedly "Snow") were found and their full mtDNA was tested as well. Neither one of these 2 womens' mtDNA was within Haplogroup V. This confirmed that they could not descend from Constance (Hopkins) Snow or her daughter. Even more unusual, the two women's confirmed mtDNA did not match each other either. Thus, either one (or possibly both) lines are incorrect, or Dr. Daniel Doane had children by two different women (neither one being the daughter of Constance (Hopkins) Snow).

Consequently, when these facts were brought to WikiTree's G2G in December 2023, Dr. Daniel Doane's 1st wife's "last name at birth" has been changed from "Snow" to "Unknown". She should still be considered Dr. Doane's 1st wife and mother of first 8 children (to about 1682). See the WikiTree G2G discussion, posted on December 13, 2023. It presents both "pro" and "con" suggestions as to the scientific basis and accuracy of this mtDNA research conducted under the auspices of the General Society of Mayflower Descendants.[1]

Sources

  1. 1.0 1.1 https://www.wikitree.com/g2g/1673435/does-anyone-know-if-gsmd-has-budged-re-constance-snow-doane
  2. "Mayflower Families Genealogies in Progress: Stephen Hopkins" Volume: pp 4-5; Josiah Paine's notebook is in the Eastham Public Library. See: Albert Hart, Our Folk - Hart Family Genealogy, Daniel Doane (accessed 21 Aug 2023.)
  3. Pearson, Elizabeth white, "The Godfreys of Chatham, Mass.," NEHGR Vol. 127(1973):101-2, citing Gilbert H. Doane, Editor Emeritus of The Register.
  4. Our Folk, Hart Family - Constance Snow Doane (accessed 21 Aug 2023) cites "The Doane Family," III ed., 1976, Vol. 2.
  5. Note added by Chet Snow, September 23, 2104.

See also:

  • John D. Austin, Mayflower Families Through Five Generations, Vol 6, Stephen Hopkins, Plymouth, Mass.: General Society of Mayflower Descendants, 2001 [3rd edition], Pages 7-8.
  • Dunn Delong Family Tree at Rootsweb (Essentially unsourced - generic databases) (Link via Wayback Machine at Archive.org, capture date 16 Mar 2023.)
  • U.S. and International Marriage Records, 1560-1900. by Yates Publishing - Online publication - Provo, UT, USA: The Generations Network, Inc., 2004. This unique collection of records was extracted from a variety of sources including family group sheets and electronic databases. Page: Source number: 1182.000; Source type: Electronic Database; Number of Pages: 1; Submitter Code: GAK. Note: http://trees.ancestry.com/rd?f=sse&db=worldmarr_ga&h=1136193&ti=0&indiv=try&gss=pt Birth date: 1646 - Birth place: MA - Marriage date: 1666...
  • Doane Family Association of America, "Doane" Vol. II, pg. 2
  • General Society of Mayflower Descendants, "MFIP Stephen Hopkins" pp 4-5 states "Josiah Paine, town clerk and historian of Harwich, wrote that Nicholas and Constance had a daughter named for her mother who was first wife of Daniel Doane of Eastham".
  • A.E. Stratton, "Plymouth Colony" (Ancestry Pub SLC UT 1986). See quote from "MFIP Stephen Hopkins" above.
  • A. A. Doane "Doane " Vol. I pg 26; "Dawes-Gates and Allied Families" 2:305
  • MAYFLOWER INCREASINGS by Susan Rosser not listed as a child spouse: Doane, Daniel (~1636 - 1712) - m. Bef 1666
  • The Doane family : I. Deacon John Doane, of Plymouth, II. Doctor John Done, of Maryland, and their descendants : with notes upo. Ancestry.com
  • Family Data Collection - Marriages. Edmund West, compiler. Online publication - Provo, UT, USA: The Generations Network, Inc., 2001.
  • U.S. and International Marriage Records, 1560-1900. Yates Publishing. Online publication - Provo, UT, USA: The Generations Network, Inc., 2004.
  • American Genealogical-Biographical Index (AGBI). Godfrey Memorial Library, comp. Online publication - Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 1999.

Acknowledgments

  • Thank you to Kathleen Nelson for creating WikiTree profile Snow-1847 through the import of Kathys_Nelsons.ged on Jun 16, 2013.
  • Thank you to Michael Foos for creating WikiTree profile Snow-2141 through the import of Atha.ged on Dec 17, 2013.
  • Thank you to Ken McIsaac for creating WikiTree profile Snow-2177 through the import of McIsaac Heritage_2012-03-03_2013-12-14 C_2013-12-18_2013-12-18.ged on Dec 18, 2013.
  • Thank you to Snow descendant: Chet Snow, for researching and writing this profile's biography after merging Snow-2141 and Snow-2177 on September 4, 2014. And for editing geographical descriptions and Sources for clarity on June 13, 2017 and again on August 21, 2023. And for changing her surname to "Unknown" and editing this profile after new mtDNA evidence was revealed, Dec. 15, 2023.




Is Constance your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Constance by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Constance:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 15

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
The Mayflower Quarterly, Fall 2019, page 40 has a report by Muriel Curits Cushing (who at that time was the Historian for the Florida Society of Mayflower Descendants). Through the Women of the Mayflower project, multiple matrilineal (all female line) descendants of Constance (Hopkins) Snow were discovered and were full mtDNA tested. The results indicated where Constance fell under Haplogroup V.

Subsequently, two matrilineal descendants of Daniel Doane (with his supposed wife Constance Hopkins) were discovered and full mtDNA tested as well. Neither one of these individuals fell under Haplogroup V (indicating where they could NOT descend from Constance Hopkins). Even more unusual, the two individuals did not match each other. Thus, either one (or possibly both) lines are incorrect, or Daniel Doane had children by two different wives (neither one being Constance Hopkins).

Since "The Question of Constance Snow as the Daughter of Constance Hopkins and Nicholas Snow" (the title of the article mentioned above) proved to be No, the wife of Daniel Doane cannot Be Constance Hopkins, then this profile should be deleted.

posted on Snow-1847 (merged) by Raymond Wing
edited by Raymond Wing
I think, since there are no primary records to support that Nicholas and Constance (Hopkins) Snow had a child named Constance and no primary record for Daniel Doane’s marriage to his first wife, that Snow-1847 should be disconnect from the current parents until such time as better proof of this relationship can be obtained. Currently, descendants of Daniel Doane and “Constance Snow” will be told by WikiTree that they descend from Stephen Hopkins and Constance Hopkins on that line, even though the Mayflower Society does not regard this as proven and will reject applications for membership through it. Even FamilySearch no longer lists Constance Snow as a child of Nicholas and Constance (Hopkins) Snow.
posted on Snow-1847 (merged) by Stephen Newstrum
edited by Stephen Newstrum
This is what the "Uncertain" button is for and it is clearly marked for both of Constance's parents. Although the Josiah Paine "source" is not 18th Century and not accepted as contemporary by the Mayflower Society, Gov. Bradford's statement of 12 "living" Snow children in 1651 would accommodate 2 daughters not otherwise named; this is enough to allow the name filiation but with "Uncertain" marked. The issue has been debated for many years and it's very-unlikely any "new" evidence will turn up at this late date.
posted on Snow-1847 (merged) by Chet Snow
I believe the “Uncertain” flag was set very recently, but thanks for that. I am hoping that further work on the mtDNA front may, in the future, provide a more definite answer one way or the other.
posted on Snow-1847 (merged) by Stephen Newstrum
I find the last sentence of the second paragraph of the Biography confusing, and perhaps incorrect. "This is the only contemporary source, cited by Governor Wm. Bradford in 1651, that confirms Constance's parentage and marriage.[1]" Josiah Paine was not a 'contemporary source' - he was born in 1836, and his son did not publish Josiah Paine's notes and writings until 1937. William Bradford most certainly did not cite Paine's work. William Bradford, in 1650-51, wrote in "Of Plimoth Plantation": Stephen Hopkins' "daughter Constanta, is also married, and hath 12 children all of them living, and one of them married." Many surmise that Constant Snow is one of those daughters of Constance Hopkins and Nicholas Snow, and that she was Daniel Doane's first wife.
posted on Snow-1847 (merged) by Lynne Collins
Thank you for the information; I have updated the biography statements to accommodate what you suggest. The filiation of Constance to Nicholas & Constance (Hopkins) Snow is marked "Uncertain" for just the reasons you mention.
posted on Snow-1847 (merged) by Chet Snow
I have a small quibble with the discussions about the courthouse fire in Barnstable: Daniel Doane and family lived in Eastham. The vital & church records for that town were not stored in the county court house. What burned in Barnstable were only the land records and probate files, but probate books survived. See Barnstable Registry's notes on the 1827 fire. I don't see the relavance to how that fire would affect the records for this family.
posted on Snow-1847 (merged) by Bobbie (Madison) Hall
So I see a lot of effort has gone into who she is not. So what are the efforts proving who she is, if not Constance Snow. Then who was the 1st wife of Daniel Doane, I would surely think proving who she was carries as much weight, if not more than who she wasn't. I would bet even money that she who they claim. Seems to me the population vrs the record keeping of the time might yield some favorable odds. what if any DNA do we have of her male off sping compared to Giles off spring.
posted on Snow-1847 (merged) by Russell Houston
Several centuries worth of effort have gone into proving who she is, Russell, probably by hundreds of descendants. The Mayflower Society's current stance is what is shown here, not just WikiTree members. The vital records of the area have all been scoured for clues, you can be certain of that. As for DNA evidence, I'm unsure where that stands, but maybe the solution sometime in the not too distant future. If you're a candidate to add to that solution, that would be terrific.
posted on Snow-1847 (merged) by Bobbie (Madison) Hall
Her male offspring would have more Doane DNA than Snow. The Doane Family Association of America, Inc. has an ongoing DNA project, and we do have DNA from known (through records) Daniel Doane descendants. However mtDNA (what you inherit from your mother) is harder to prove over time because each generation introduces new mtDNA from each woman who marries in. For instance, you inherited most of your mtDNA from your mother, but your children get most of theirs from their mother, not yours, so their female mtDNA would be tracing back to their mother, her mother, her mother and so on. This is why my male Thompson cousins will share Y-DNA from our fathers, but we girl cousins don't share the majority of our mtDNA as we have different mothers. DNA is not a simple solution to proving ancestry by any means, and I believe all true genealogists recognize that fact.
posted on Snow-1847 (merged) by Arlene Thompson
Daniel Doane's " marriages are not recorded in Eastham records. His 1st wife is believed by some genealogists to have been Constance Snow, dau. of Nicholas and Constance (Hopkins), but no documentary evidence has been found. The assumption is based upon the names of two of his children : Constant (a son) and Constance (a daughter). The Society of Mayflower Descendants has not accepted this assumption. The Doane Family Association of America, The Doane Family Volume 2, (Doane Family Association, 1975) pg. 3. Since there is no proof of a relationship between Daniel and Constance Snow, she will be removed as a spouse of Daniel's until someone can provide a primary source indicating they were married.
posted on Snow-1847 (merged) by [Living Glover]
Snow-2177 and Snow-2141 appear to represent the same person because: Please merge. Thanks.
posted on Snow-1847 (merged) by Vic Watt
1646

Death: Oct., 1682

  • References* -- The Mayflower Families, Vol. 6, "Stephen Hopkins", p. 9-10, 23-24, 83-84.


Family links: Parents: Nicholas Snow (1600 - 1676) Constance Hopkins Snow (1605 - 1677)

Spouse: Daniel Doane (1636 - 1712)

Children: Joseph Doane (1669 - 1757)* Constance Doane Shaw (1669 - 1741)*

  • Calculated relationship


Burial: Cove Burying Ground Eastham Barnstable County Massachusetts, USA

posted on Snow-1847 (merged) by Sharon Smith
What's the policy of listing the obvious same person, with different spellings of surnames, twice?

For example, Israel Doane, and Isreal Doan are the same person and shown twice.

posted on Snow-1847 (merged) by Bill Jennings
Last name should reflect Snow
posted on Snow-1847 (merged) by Robert Weaver

[Do you know Constance's family name?]  |  D  >  Doane  >  Constance (Unknown) Doane