no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Juliana Stacy (1593 - 1632)

Juliana Stacy
Born in Westerham Parish, Kent, Englandmap
Ancestors ancestors
Daughter of and
[sibling(s) unknown]
Wife of — married 1622 in Sundridge, Kent, Englandmap
Descendants descendants
Died at about age 39 in Sundridge, Kent, Englandmap
Problems/Questions Profile managers: James Stratman private message [send private message] and Rachel Graham private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 15 Mar 2013
This page has been accessed 1,462 times.

Biography

Juliana was born in 1593 - some say her date of birth was 03 February 1593, but I have not found any sources to back this up. Juliana Stacy (July Stacie) and Christopher Thomas were married 13 Sep 1612 when Juliana was 19 years of age. They were married at St Mary at Lambeth, Lambeth, Surrey, England. [1]

Juliana passed away in April of 1632. She is buried at All Saints Churchyard, Orpington, London Borough of Bromley, Greater London, England. [2] [3]

Profile originally stated death as 1632.

This profile is a collaborative work-in-progress. Can you contribute information or sources?


Sources

  1. London, England, Church of England Baptisms, Marriages and Burials, 1538-1812 for July Stacie, Lambeth, St Mary at Lambeth, 1539-1670
  2. Find A Grave: Memorial #157416876
  3. Orpington : All Saints : Register of unspecified type : "Parish Register" database, FreeREG (https://www.freereg.org.uk/search_records/581812cfe93790ec75bc34ef : viewed 18 Sep 2020) burial Julian Thomas Apr 1632




Is Juliana your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of Juliana's DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 2

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Stacy-655 and Stacy-270 appear to represent the same person because: Same name, same parents, same husband, dates need to be reconciled
posted by Bob Tonsmeire
Stacy-655 and Stacy-270 appear to represent the same person because: Hi, These are the same person and need to be merged. Thank you.

James Stratman

posted by James Stratman

S  >  Stacy  >  Juliana Stacy