no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

John Stewart Snr. (1667 - 1704)

John Stewart Snr.
Born in Queens, New York Colony, British Colonial Americamap
Son of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Husband of — married [date unknown] [location unknown]
Descendants descendants
Died at age 36 in Lewes, Sussex County, Delaware, British Colonial Americamap
Profile last modified | Created 24 May 2011
This page has been accessed 2,188 times.


Contents

Biography

John Stewart Snr. is a member of Clan Stewart.
This profile is part of the Stewart Name Study.

John Stewart was born on 24 November 1667 in Charlestown, Middlesex County, Massachusetts, British Colonial America.

He plied the trade of a carpenter and later became proficient as a surgeon and as such was referred to as Dr John. (No formal qualification found).

He passed away on 1 November 1704 in Lewes, Sussex County, Delaware, British American Colonies and was buried at the Lewes Presbyterian Church Cemetery, Lewes, Sussex County, Delaware, British American Colonies.

Marriage

John Stewart was married to Elizabeth Alberti about 1690 in Long Island City, Queens County, New York, British American Colonies.

Children

Children of Dr. John Stewart and his wife Elizabeth Alberti (Albertis, Albertus);

  • 1. Samuel Stewart. b. Jul 19, 1688.
  • 2. David Stewart. b. 1689 - d. 1717.
  • 3. John Stewart. b. 1694.
  • 4. Elizabeth Stewart. b. 1696.
  • 5. William Stewart b. 1698.
  • 6. Hannah Stewart. b. 1700.
  • 7. Mary Stewart. b. 1702 in York County, North Carolina. British American Colonies.

Notes

Dr. John Stewart still lived in New York in 1686 when his father was a witness to a land transaction between Adam Wright & William Buckler.

Townsend & John Newman.
John Townsend & Adam Wright were of the Townsend & Wright families that were also related to the Stewarts.

Sometime before 1697 the family had moved to Monmouth Co., New Jersey, in the town of Shrewsbury. Shortly after the family arrived in Monmouth Co., (Dr. John Stewart) became the High Sheriff of the County. In 1700, he became the High Sheriff of Monmouth Co., New Jersey & held the position until sometime in 1702, when he was succeeded by Jonathan Bailey. It is not known whether he lost the election to Bailey or if he chose not to run for the office again. However, later Bailey was killed and John became the High Sheriff again, & held the office for 18 years. (Per Joyce Lindstrom: This is doubtful as John died in 1704 in Sussex Co., Del.)

On 8-27-1700, the grand jury indicted Richard Salter & 14 other men "for riotously assembling on the 17th day of July & assaulting John Stewart, High Sheriff, & Henry Leonard on the path near to the house of Alexander Adams, beat & grievously wounded the said persons, took their swords from them, break them, & carried them away & kept them, to the value of 5 pounds money of the province in breach of the peace & the terror of the King's league people." The above indictment is recorded in the New Jersey Historical Society Coll., F. 853.626, Pg. 352).

Dr. John Stewart made a will with James Simpson, Samuel Knowles & Roger Corbett as witnesses. In his will, proved in court, in Sussex Co., Delaware 1-13-1705, he listed as one of his children, William

The will includes references to property in Monmouth County, New Jersey and to farms in Queens County, Nassau, Long Island, New York. It gives his executor -- wife Elizabeth Stuart -- full and ample power to sell property It appoints friends as exercisers (agents of Executor?) Alexander Innes of Middleton, East New Jersey and Levin Morris of Shrewsbury, East New Jersey

They will also ask his wife to bring up their children “in the fear of God and convenient learning as to be had in these American parts.”


Sources


  • Delaware, Wills and Probate Records, 1676-1971: Sussex: General index, 1682-1948; Wills, book A, 1682-1781. Image 330. Images available at FamilySearch.org: [1], accessed 13 Oct 2019
Will of JOHN STUART, Chirugeon
Signed: 1 --ember 1704; Proved: 13 Jan 1704/05
Heirs: wife, Elizabeth Stuart; children: Samuel Stuart, David Stuart, John Stuart, Elizabeth Stuart, William Stuart, Johannah Stuart, Mary Stuart
Executors: Elizabeth Stuart
Witnesses: Samuel Knowles, Roger Corbett

Acknowledgments

Click the Changes tab for the details of contributions by Suzanne and others.





Is John your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with John by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. Y-chromosome DNA test-takers in his direct paternal line on WikiTree: It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with John:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 15

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Dr. John Stewart is definitely not the son of Alexander Stewart of MA. d. 1731, therefore

Dr. John’s son Samuel Stewart does not descend from Alexander Stewart either.

It is a disservice to Alexander to use the speculations plural. By serious standards of genealogical proof, no proof of parents, birthplace or birthdate is provable from Alexander's records. If all the parents and birthdates that had been attached had been left, he could have had at least 10 different sets of parents and birthdates—based on whoever's speculations. NO American record proves his parents. NO Scotland record proves his parents and lots of people had his name. Let's use high standards of genealogical proof rather than all the speculation. Thee University of Durham is doing a scholarly DNA study of Stewarts in Scotland and Scottish prisoners of war because there is no proof of parents for most of the Scottish prisoners of war who ended up in Massachusetts. There going to a lot of unnecessary effort if all this stuff online had been proven which it has not. The sources posted here were making a 3 different person "Scottish" identity based on similar names but not based on historical fact which shows the differences. Until proof is realized by scholarly research, let's let him be who he was, Alexander Stewart, tailor of Charlestown and Marlborough and use only his proven sources.

See DNA results on Family Search-

https://www.familysearch.org/photos/artifacts/161951305?p=51969989&returnLabel=Alexander%20Stewart%20(93JG-VPV)&returnUrl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.familysearch.org%2Ftree%2Fperson%2Fmemories%2F93JG-VPV

posted by Nancy Yeager
Were getting there waiting on Paul Anderson to approve.
posted by Allan Stuart
I agree.

Perhaps Suzanne Reed, Linda Perry, or Herbert Wolfe know how to correct this? I do not, sorry.

posted by JIm Walker Sr.
Stewart-3428 and Stewart-2374 appear to represent the same person because: Obvious Duplicate
posted by Allan Stuart
Stewart-51660 and Stewart-3428 appear to represent the same person because: obvious Duplicate
posted on Stewart-3428 (merged) by Allan Stuart
the will (just added as source) is a poor image of a handwritten transcription -- it's like reading mud. I tried to pull out the good stuff: the chirugeon, the property holdings, and the wish for his children to be educated.
posted on Stewart-3428 (merged) by AM Hayes
Stewart-3428 and Stewart-7412 appear to represent the same person because: These two brothers have the same name, the same birth date/location, the same place of death. They're both married to the same woman, Alberti-13.

I suggest the difference may be due to Old Style 1704/05 dating for the first three months of the modern calendar -- year didn't change over until March 25 rather than Jan. 1

posted on Stewart-3428 (merged) by AM Hayes
Replacing father connection to Stewart-26704, who lived in Scotland, with Stewart-3401, who lived in Massachusetts.
posted on Stewart-3428 (merged) by Ellen Smith
Hi Suzanne,

Clearly, Jeannette Forsythe, b. 1655, who married Robert Stewart (same birth year), cannot be the mother of Dr. John Stewart, born in about 1660.

Vic

posted on Stewart-3428 (merged) by Vic Watt
Stewart-11669 and Stewart-3428 are not ready to be merged because: Not enough evidence to match at this time.
posted on Stewart-3428 (merged) by Herbert Wolfe Jr.
Stewart-11669 and Stewart-3428 appear to represent the same person because: Please review these potential duplicates.

Thank you.

posted on Stewart-3428 (merged) by Philip Smith
Stewart-7412 and Stewart-3428 are not ready to be merged because: It is not clear these are the same two people, especially considering the differing parents. They are certainly not ready to merge with the birth and marriage dates of the parents of 7412 in comparison to John's date of birth.
posted on Stewart-3428 (merged) by Herbert Wolfe Jr.
Stewart-7412 and Stewart-3428 appear to represent the same person because: As Stewart-7412 has sources and 3428 has none - please merge using 7412 as correct and possibility adding a note on the unsourced second parents.
posted on Stewart-3428 (merged) by Philip Smith
Stewart-7412 and Stewart-3428 are not ready to be merged because: http://www.chuckspeed.com/balquhidder/history/Robert_Stewart_Covenanter.htm

My records as well as those of others with good reference support the parentage I have presented. I have no wish to change them based on my inquiry.

posted on Stewart-3428 (merged) by Suzanne Reed
Stewart-7412 and Stewart-3428 appear to represent the same person because: we need to reconcile these different parents. Could you both check your sources on this?.......
posted on Stewart-3428 (merged) by [Living E]