Jane was born about 1712. Jane Stickney ...
Jane, daughter of Moses Stickney & Sarah, was born on 2 February 1713 in Newbury, Essex, Massachusetts, United States.[1]
Sources
Massachusetts, Town and Vital Records, 1620-1988 - p. 114 - lists parents of Jane Stickney as Moses Stickney and Sarah, his wife was Sarah Pettingill daughter of Nathaniel Pettingill and Margaret.
Previously married to Joseph "Jacob" Garland.
Footnotes
↑Birth:
"Massachusetts Births and Christenings, 1639-1915"
citing FHL microfilm: 886203;
FamilySearch Record: FZL6-5Q6 (accessed 8 July 2023)
Jane Stickney born on 2 Feb 1713, daughter of Moses Stickney & Sarah, in Newbury, Essex, Massachusetts, United States.
Acknowledgments
Is Jane your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Jane by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Jane:
Stickney-409 and Stickney-166 appear to represent the same person because: Cleared the double sister conflict. Can be merged with some cleanup I believe.
Stickney-409 and Stickney-166 are not ready to be merged because: Stickney-409 has a sister (Stickney-166) who is the same person you are recommending merging into. That should be sorted first, I believe.
Stickney-409 and Stickney-166 appear to represent the same person because: These most likely look like duplicates although, the later biography lacks sources and information. I still believe it is an attempt to represent the same person.