no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Jane (Stickney) Swett (1712 - aft. 1759)

Jane Swett formerly Stickney aka Garland
Born in Newbury, Essex, Massachusettsmap
Ancestors ancestors
Wife of — married 30 Dec 1736 [location unknown]
Wife of — married 1750 in Rockingham County, New Hampshiremap
Descendants descendants
Died after after age 46 in Massachusettsmap
Problems/Questions Profile managers: Jeffrey Swett private message [send private message] and Scott Mitchell private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 30 Dec 2013
This page has been accessed 306 times.

Contents

Biography

Jane was born about 1712. Jane Stickney ... Jane, daughter of Moses Stickney & Sarah, was born on 2 February 1713 in Newbury, Essex, Massachusetts, United States.[1]

Sources

Massachusetts, Town and Vital Records, 1620-1988 - p. 114 - lists parents of Jane Stickney as Moses Stickney and Sarah, his wife was Sarah Pettingill daughter of Nathaniel Pettingill and Margaret.

Previously married to Joseph "Jacob" Garland.

Footnotes

  1. Birth: "Massachusetts Births and Christenings, 1639-1915"
    citing FHL microfilm: 886203;
    FamilySearch Record: FZL6-5Q6 (accessed 8 July 2023)
    Jane Stickney born on 2 Feb 1713, daughter of Moses Stickney & Sarah, in Newbury, Essex, Massachusetts, United States.

Acknowledgments





Is Jane your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Jane by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Jane:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 4

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Stickney-409 and Stickney-166 appear to represent the same person because: Cleared the double sister conflict. Can be merged with some cleanup I believe.
posted by Jeffrey Swett
Stickney-409 and Stickney-166 are not ready to be merged because: Stickney-409 has a sister (Stickney-166) who is the same person you are recommending merging into. That should be sorted first, I believe.
posted by Jeffrey Swett
Stickney-409 and Stickney-166 appear to represent the same person because: These most likely look like duplicates although, the later biography lacks sources and information. I still believe it is an attempt to represent the same person.
posted by Darlene Bissonnette
Stickney-166 and Stickney-313 appear to represent the same person because: Scott, this looks like a good match! Thanks, Jeff
posted by Jeffrey Swett

S  >  Stickney  |  S  >  Swett  >  Jane (Stickney) Swett