Hannah Stockton was born in about 1658 in Flushing, Long Island, New York. She was a daughter of Abigail (unknown) and Richard "The Emigrant" Stockton. Hannah married Phillip Phillips
She died in July of 1710 in Burlington County, New Jersey. [1]
Lee, Francis Bazley. Genealogical and Memorial History of the State of New Jersey Publication: Name: Lewis Historical Publishing Company; Location: New York; Date: 1910;
Genealogical and memorial history of the state of New Jersey : a book of the achievements of her people in the making of a commonwealth and the founding of a nation. New York: Lewis Historical Publishing Co., 1910.
Mackenzie, George Norbury, and Nelson Osgood Rhoades, editors. Colonial Families of the United States of America: in Which is Given the History, Genealogy and Armorial Bearings of Colonial Families Who Settled in the American Colonies From the Time of the Settlement of Jamestown, 13th May, 1607, to the Battle of Lexington, 19th April, 1775. 7 volumes. 1912. Reprinted, Baltimore: Genealogical Publishing Co., Inc., 1966, 1995.
Is Hannah your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Hannah by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Hannah:
Robin, you are correct, the parents shown here for Hannah are wrong. She was a daughter of Richard "The Emigrant" Stockton (Stockton-125) and Abigail (nee unknown) Stockton (unknown-198551).
The parents listed here are clearly incorrect since she was born 37 years before they were born. Any objections to moving her to her real parents, Richard and Abigail?
Phillip Phillips, I remember seeing this fellow before on another site. There were a lot of Phillips's in the area then, not all of them related, some up in Hunterdon, many were Quakers.
Stockton-210 and Phillips-1529 appear to represent the same person because: Same parents, same husband. PHILLIPS is wrong as Last Name at Birth--should be Stockton. But these are the same person and should be merged as Hannah Stockton, current last name Phillips. The Philips also need to be merged.
Stockton-210 and Stockton-297 appear to represent the same person because: The Hannah Stockton who married Phillip Phillips was the daughter of Richard Stockton. The merge should help clean this up by eliminating her connection to Job Stockton. Unless, of course, I am mistaken and there is evidence to the contrary--if so, please include in the bio! Thanks. Linda