Sarah and Thomas christened their son, John, on 14 January 1699 in North Farnham Parish.[2]
Sarah and Thomas christened their son, Gregory, on 10 March 1700 in North Farnham Parish.[3]
Sarah and Thomas christened their daughter, Elizabeth, on 20 April 1703 in North Farnham Parish.[4]
Sarah and Thomas christened their son, Thomas, on 12 April 1705 in North Farnham Parish.[5]
Sarah and Thomas christened their son, Peter, on 13 March 1714 in North Farnham Parish.[6]
Sarah was 58 or 59 when she died on 8 January 1730 in Richmond County, Virginia.[7]
DNA
GEDMatch comparison of WikiTree member kits (see DNA Connections on the right hand side of this profile) as of 18 August 2020.
A relationship highlighted in green indicates a match over 7 cM. Any relationship that is 3rd cousin or further can be valid without sharing any DNA, based on the analysis of the Shared cM Project. A visual representation can be found at DNA Painter.
↑ 1.01.1 "U.S. and International Marriage Records, 1560-1900," database, Ancestry (http://www.ancestry.com : accessed 18 August 2020), entry for Thomas Glascock-Sarah Stone, Virginia, 1689; citing Yates Publishing, compiler, "U.S. and International Marriage Records, 1560-1900," database
"U.S. and International Marriage Records, 1560-1900"; citing WAY, submitter; This source is a collection of derived information from family group sheets, pedigree charts, family history articles, queries, letters, Bible records, wills, and manuscript genealogies.
Geni.com profile page for Sarah (Stone) Glasscock: http://www.geni.com/people/Sarah-Glascock/6000000000183066038 ; Source Citation; Birth year: 1671; Birth city: Richmond; Birth state: VA; Source Information: Edmund West, comp. Family Data Collection - Individual Records [database on-line]. Provo, UT,; USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2000.
Is Sarah your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Sarah by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Sarah:
I think the minimum for a DNA match to be considered significant is 45 cMs. A value lower than that can be caused by random variations as well as noise such as descent from both maternal and paternal lines.
Stone-12166 and Stone-273 appear to represent the same person because: These two profiles almost certainly represent that same person. If you agree, please merge.
Sarah Stone-12166 and Sarah Stone-273 are obvious duplicates, but their fathers, each a different profile for William Stone, have different parents (Sarah's grandparents) that need to be resolved before Sarah's profiles can be merged.
Sarah Stone-12166 and Sarah Stone-273 are obvious duplicates, but their fathers, each a different profile for William Stone, have different parents (Sarah's grandparents) that need to be resolved before Sarah's profiles can be merged.