Elizabeth Stone was born December 21, 1713 in Middlesex, Massachusetts Bay Colony, British Colonial America, the daughter of Capt Samuel Stone and Abigail (Reed) Stone.[1] She married John Stone on January 13, 1731 in Rutland, Worchester, Massachusetts and they were parents of eight children,[2] the last being stillborn.
Elizabeth died on May 21, 1751 in Rutland,[3] at the age of 38, and was buried in Old Burying Ground in Rutland with two of their children. [4]
↑ "Massachusetts, Town Clerk, Vital and Town Records, 1626-2001," database with images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:Q29L-TDR7 : 10 November 2020), Elizabeth Stone, 4 May 1751; citing Death, Rutland, Worcester, Massachusetts Bay Colony, British Colonial America, Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth, Boston; FHL microfilm 004934224.
Is Elizabeth your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Elizabeth by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Elizabeth:
Hill-33747 and Stone-23252 appear to represent the same person because: Clear duplicate, even though the LNAB is different. Dates, places and spouse are the same
Sources for Stone-23252 prove parents, spouse and all dates.
According to records the first wife of John Stone (Stone-1441) was Elizabeth (LNAB Stone) daughter of Samuel Stone and Abigail Reed. I created a profile for her (Stone-23252) but of course the profile for Elizabeth Hill didn't show as a possibility.
A new merge will need to be done between (Hill-33747) and (Stone-23252) so I have proposed it.
Since the PM for this profile hasn't been active since 2019, it's likely the merge can't be completed for 30 days. There are times I really dislike that rule, but I understand why it's necessary.
Sources for Stone-23252 prove parents, spouse and all dates.
A new merge will need to be done between (Hill-33747) and (Stone-23252) so I have proposed it.
edited by Donna (Stephens) Harris