no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Rachel Edna (Taylor) Beasley (1717 - 1789)

Rachel Edna Beasley formerly Taylor
Born in Baltimore, Anne Arundel, Marylandmap
Ancestors ancestors
Wife of — married 1742 in Beasley Island, Craven County, North Carolinamap
Descendants descendants
Died at about age 71 in Beasley Island, Craven County, North Carolinamap
Profile last modified | Created 31 Oct 2013
This page has been accessed 1,176 times.

Biography

Rachel Eda was born in 1717. Rachel Eda Taylor ... She passed away in 1789.

Solomon married first RACHEL TAYLOR, daughter of Abraham Taylor.[1][2]

Research Notes

Washington, D.C.; Washington, D.C.; NAI Title: General Index to Civil War and Later Pension Files, ca. 1949 - ca. 1949; NAI Number: 563268; Record Group Title: Records of the Department of Veterans Affairs, 1773 - 2007; Record Grou Note: A "contest widow" is a rival claimant to the right to receive a widow's pension.In a time when divorce, remarriage, palimony, and name changes were far less official, it was possible for multiple associations to surround a CW vet's life.Identity theft, mistaken identity, fraud, and what was euphemistically called "vicious habits" (sex offenses, prostitution, etc) were all grounds for denial of a purported vet's or widow's claim to gratuitous benefits.In 1863 the whole business of dependency in veterans' claims was still evolving.Each of the women on the file had to prove their right to receive an award.Ultimately the decisions were made by the Pension Bureau's Law Division. If there are three women on the claim file, each with a "widow original" pension application, I suspect:(1) a former wife, with dependents, and possibly a legitimate divorce decree; (2) a current wife; (3) a woman who claimed the decedent was in fact her long-lost husband, who skeedaddled from the family and supposedly changed his name.Children of a former marriage were entitled to benefits as dependents, with a guardian (usually the former wife or her new husband) actually receiving the benefits.Pension vouchers were prepared quarterly.If the award amount was .00 a month, this would mean four .00 vouchers a year.They could be redeemed at the Post Office; the postmasters actually received them and held them in trust for the pensioners to pick up.In an era when a working man's wage was a day, pensions were a tempting source of free lifetime $$.

Sources

  1. Abraham Taylor will (1751), Craven County, North Carolina, Will Book 5: 262. See also Stephen E. Bradley, Early Records of North Carolina (Keysville, Virginia: Stephen E. Bradley, 1994), 7: 110; record no. 516.
  2. U. S. Census, Craven County, North Carolina, page 432, column 2, line 45, Solomon Beazley; National Archives microfilm publication M637, roll 7.

See also:

  • North Carolina, Index to Marriage Bonds, 1741-1868 Ancestry.com Publication: Ancestry.com Operations Inc
  • Family Data Collection - Births Edmund West, comp. Publication: Ancestry.com Operations Inc
  • Family Data Collection - Marriages Edmund West, comp. Publication: Ancestry.com Operations Inc
  • American Genealogical-Biographical Index (AGBI) Godfrey Memorial Library, comp. Publication: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc.




Is Rachel your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Rachel by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Rachel:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 4

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Data for kit T5398016 Carolyn (Dyess) Dyess Bales not found on Gedmatch. All others are a stong 14-16 chromosomes match.
posted by [Living Taylor]
Taylor-16352 and Taylor-29108 appear to represent the same person because: Duplicate husbands of Rachel Taylor were merged, now need to merge duplicate wives.
posted by Douglas Beezley
Taylor-16352 and Taylor-36043 appear to represent the same person because: Please compare and merge these two matches.
Removed John Beasley as child of Rachael Taylor due to research from Doug Beezley: "John Beasley m Margaret Smith is not the son of Solomon/Rachel Beasley. Beasley's of Darlington SC are commonly confused with Beasley's of Rutherford TN. To date. Solomon's son John is the Tennessee branch. To date, the true father of this John Beasley is no known although they are genetically related to the Solomon/Rachel Beasley line."
posted by Doug Matthews

T  >  Taylor  |  B  >  Beasley  >  Rachel Edna (Taylor) Beasley