Note: Questionable if this was the Stephen Taylor of early Windsor. This DOB says about 1608; other sources show a Stephen Taylor of Windsor born about 1624. This profile is linked to Elizabeth Nowell as Stephen's second wife. Other sources name Elizabeth Newell as Stephen's wife. Priest-412 23:54, 15 April 2014 (EDT)
Date of death before 1708 (estimate = DOB + 100 years, life span less than 100 years).
Birth
Birth:
Date: ABT 1608
Place: <Haverhill, Suffolk, England>
Removed ABT from Birth Date and marked as uncertain.
If Stephen truly a child of Margaret Willmote Willmote-14, then she would have been about 64 y/o at time of Stephen's biirth, not likely. So either she is not the mother or Stephen was born much earlier than 1608. Priest-412 15:27, 3 July 2015 (EDT)
Author: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
Abbreviation: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
Publication: June 1998 (c), data as of 5 JAN 1998
Abbreviation: Church Resources - Ancestral File (TM)
Master Listing Source: Y
Source: S-2091851085 Repository: #R-2142489842 Title: Ancestry Family Trees Publication: Online publication - Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com. Original data: Family Tree files submitted by Ancestry members. Note: This information comes from 1 or more individual Ancestry Family Tree files. This source citation points you to a current version of those files. Note: The owners of these tree files may have removed or changed information since this source citation was created. Page: Ancestry Family Trees Note: Data: Text: http://trees.ancestry.com/pt/AMTCitationRedir.aspx?tid=28006477&pid=1025
Source: S-2091989953 Repository: #R-2142489842 Title: U.S. and International Marriage Records, 1560-1900 Author: Yates Publishing Publication: Online publication - Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2004. Original data - This unique collection of records was extracted from a variety of sources including family group sheets and electronic databases. Originally, the information was derived Note: APID: 1,7836::0
WikiTree profile Taylor-2501 was created through the import of Savage.ged on 21 February 2011.
WikiTree profile Taylor-9514 created through the import of Williams Family Tree(1).ged on May 30, 2012.
Acknowledgments
Thank you to Garin Savage for creating Taylor-2501 on 21 Feb 2011. Click the Changes tab for the details on contributions by Garin and others.
WikiTree profile Taylor-9514 created through the import of Williams Family Tree(1).ged on May 30, 2012 by Chris Harter. See the Changes page for the details of edits by Chris and others.
Thanks to x [] for Find A Grave memorial.
Is Stephen your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
It appears that all of the information in this profile should be deleted. None of it is biography, factual, sourced, or coherent. Rather, it's a mishmash of various modern people's assertions and corrections, and random metadata from third party websites that doesn't belong on WikiTree.
Chris, are you managing this profile? Do you mind if I delete everything and leave it blank? The profile deserves a disputed origins or research notes section saying something like: we have no idea who this person is or whether he is the person who got married in colonial Connecticut.
However, the comment that his mother must have been ~64 when she gave birth to him is wrong. The connected mother's children were born between 1595-1608 which is credible on its face. However, all of them except this one are supposed to have been born in a different town quite a long way from Haverhill. So, this is fishy.
Given his connected siblings are born in St Albans, which is ~70 miles away, including his sister Marie (Mary) who was born the year before him and died a year after he was born... both documented in St Albans not Haverhill, I think we need to identify what is our error. Birthplace? Family group ie parentage? Identity?
Chris, are you managing this profile? Do you mind if I delete everything and leave it blank? The profile deserves a disputed origins or research notes section saying something like: we have no idea who this person is or whether he is the person who got married in colonial Connecticut.
However, the comment that his mother must have been ~64 when she gave birth to him is wrong. The connected mother's children were born between 1595-1608 which is credible on its face. However, all of them except this one are supposed to have been born in a different town quite a long way from Haverhill. So, this is fishy.