Contents |
Note: Questionable if this was the Stephen Taylor of early Windsor. This DOB says about 1608; other sources show a Stephen Taylor of Windsor born about 1624. This profile is linked to Elizabeth Nowell as Stephen's second wife. Other sources name Elizabeth Newell as Stephen's wife. Priest-412 23:54, 15 April 2014 (EDT)
Another profile exists for the other Stephen, Stephen Taylor b. 1624.
Date of death before 1708 (estimate = DOB + 100 years, life span less than 100 years).
Removed ABT from Birth Date and marked as uncertain.
If Stephen truly a child of Margaret Willmote Willmote-14, then she would have been about 64 y/o at time of Stephen's biirth, not likely. So either she is not the mother or Stephen was born much earlier than 1608. Priest-412 15:27, 3 July 2015 (EDT)
WikiTree profile Taylor-2501 was created through the import of Savage.ged on 21 February 2011.
WikiTree profile Taylor-9514 created through the import of Williams Family Tree(1).ged on May 30, 2012.
Thank you to Garin Savage for creating Taylor-2501 on 21 Feb 2011. Click the Changes tab for the details on contributions by Garin and others.
WikiTree profile Taylor-9514 created through the import of Williams Family Tree(1).ged on May 30, 2012 by Chris Harter. See the Changes page for the details of edits by Chris and others.
Thanks to x [] for Find A Grave memorial.
Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.
Featured National Park champion connections: Stephen is 12 degrees from Theodore Roosevelt, 19 degrees from Stephanus Johannes Paulus Kruger, 11 degrees from George Catlin, 15 degrees from Marjory Douglas, 23 degrees from Sueko Embrey, 12 degrees from George Grinnell, 24 degrees from Anton Kröller, 13 degrees from Stephen Mather, 21 degrees from Kara McKean, 13 degrees from John Muir, 16 degrees from Victoria Hanover and 25 degrees from Charles Young on our single family tree. Login to find your connection.
Chris, are you managing this profile? Do you mind if I delete everything and leave it blank? The profile deserves a disputed origins or research notes section saying something like: we have no idea who this person is or whether he is the person who got married in colonial Connecticut.
However, the comment that his mother must have been ~64 when she gave birth to him is wrong. The connected mother's children were born between 1595-1608 which is credible on its face. However, all of them except this one are supposed to have been born in a different town quite a long way from Haverhill. So, this is fishy.