| William Thorne Sr. migrated to New England during the Puritan Great Migration (1621-1640). (See The Directory, by R. C. Anderson, p. 334) Join: Puritan Great Migration Project Discuss: pgm |
| William Thorne Sr. was a New Netherland settler. Join: New Netherland Settlers Project Discuss: new_netherland |
Contents |
William Thorn migrated from England in 1637 residing first in Lynn, Massachusetts Bay Colony then moving to Long Island, settling first in Gravesend, then Flushing and finally in Jamaica, New York.[1] His eventual residence in New York qualifies him for "Beyond New England" status in the Puritan Great Migration project. He may have been a Quaker late in life, as he was a signatory of the "Flushing Remonstrance" of 1657 (see "Colonial Life"). However, not all of the signatories WERE Quakers so William's religion is not certain.
William Thorn(e) may have been born around 1605 in England (his original nationality proven by his son's appearance on a list of English settlers of Flushing, Long Island who lived amongst the Dutch there, see "Death & Estate"). His parentage is not known. One baptism previously singled out was 10 Jun 1604 at Alvingham, Lincolnshire, England to John Thorne but several christenings of children of the same name are easily found around England at this time on familysearch.org and other sources.[2]
The FIndAGrave memorial for William states a birth date and location (7 Mar 1617 at Moreton, Essex, England) which is not supported by any apparent source (see "References").
His birth is sometimes quoted as 1617 or 1617, likely to make him 21 by the time he was a freeman of Lynn. However, this status typically indicated an older man who owned property and was a member of the church with some standing in society so likely he was considerably more than 21 in 1638.
Thorne was in Lynn by early 1638 as he was made a freeman there, implying that he had property and was a member of church so likely had been there for at least a year and likely more (see "Colonial Life"). No direct immigration record or primary source of his departure or arrival in New England has been found.
No record of Thorn's marriage has been found yet other than in auto-aggregated collections of unsourced user submissions such as the ancestry.com "Family Data Collection" or "International Genealogical Index". The birth years of his children are guesses so they are no real help in determining his age.
His wife is called Susannah Booth, of unknown origins on wikitree. The work of Arthur Eaton cited here[3] proved that her first name was Susannah, but said her last name was unknown.
In a followup 1965 NYGBR article her last name is stated as "Booth" and her origin (and their date and place of marriage) are specifically stated as "unknown".[4] Her last name of "Booth" is derived from genealogical work done by two genealogists (John Ross Delafield and his father Maturin Livingston Delafield) who claimed to have had an account of William Hallett stating that his alimony payment (to his ex-wife Susan, widow of William Thorn) was to be paid to "Susannah Both". No such name has been found subsequently in any original document, but Dickinson holds the Delafields in high regard and gives credence to this statement of Susannah's original surname.
Her first name (and marriage first to Thorn, then to Hallett) however is well established by these June 1669 New York court records from the legal separation of Susanna Hallett and her husband William noting a subsequent alimony suit where Susannah Hallet's son, Joseph Thorne took an active part.[4]
Torrey in "New England Marriages to 1700" sheds no additional light on the marriage of William Thorn and Susannah and makes no claim to her last name.[5]
These children are assigned to the couple but it should be noted that primary sources for dates and locations of birth do not appear on their profiles in general. Arthur Eaton's 1888 article on this family provided much detail about them[6] He only had one son "William"; another was attached at one point but has been removed.
A previous version of this family included an additional son, Denton Thorne, who has been removed (Denton was actually a grandson of this William through his son William).
Along with 41 other men, William Thorne was made a freeman of Massachusetts Bay Colony on May 2, 1638.[7]
_____ Thorn is on the list of those who are on the distribution of land at Lynn in 1638 - he received "30 acres & tenn."[8] presumably it was this man although the first name was not specified.
At Salem in 1641, William Thorne was on a member of a jury regarding a passageway for a shallop by Captain Trask's mill.[9]
In December 1645 or early 1646 William may have been on of the original patent holders at Gravesend, Long Island received by Lady Moody.[3] However, HIS NAME DOES NOT APPEAR on the patent (only Lady Moody and two others do) nor does he appear in the few remaining pages of the Gravesend original town minutes (many destroyed by fire). It is LIKELY that he was there and received a lot of land but it is NOT PROVEN.[4]
William was at Flushing, Long Island, Nieuw Nederland, by 10 Oct 1645. The original patent of that town was granted to him and seventeen others by the Dutch governor, Honorable William Kieft.[10] He may have actually been there as early as 1642; as the "History of Flushing" states that he had come 3 years before (the 1645 patent) and had settled at "Thome's Neck". But, it must be noted that this 1642 arrival was supposedly found on a page of John Bowne's journal WHICH IS NOW MISSING so while interesting, cannot be proven.[4]
On 28 Feb 1642/43 "Goodman Thorne" was found guilty in a Salem, Essex court for refusing to serve in the Military Watch. The court record read "Divers of Lynn gone to Long Island and not warned." (the phrase "not warned" apparently meant the summons was not served)[11] A Thorne family web site says that he had already left the area of Salem by that time, which matches with the "History of Flushing" stating that he was in Thome's Neck in the area of Flushing, New York by about 1642.
However, the mystery deepens as the record also contains this phrase"
William [but his name was John] Thorne for refusing to Watch in the military watch being Lawfully Commanded. Gone to Long Iland[4]
Apparently the correction "but his name was John" was written later in a different hand; the 1965 authors believe this may be disregarded as they found no record of a contemporaneous John Thorne of Lynn or on Long Island immediately afterward. They do note that there was a John Thorne, carpenter of Salem in the 1640 who died there in 1646.
William was one of the signers of the 27 Dec 1657 Flushing Remonstrance. [12] This document was a 1657 petition to Peter Styuvesant, Director General of New Netherland requesting an exemption to his ban on Quaker Worship.
The date and location of William's death are unknown. He supposedly appeared as "Goodman Thorn" in an account written by John Bowne 31 Jan 1657/58, so about one month after signing the "Remonstrance". Some unsourced sites give his death as 1664 but this seems to be based on his lack of appearance on an apparent document in that year offering Connecticut citizenship to English residents amongst the Long Island Dutch and therefore assuming that he was dead by that date. Certainly possible, but it can only be said with certainty that he was dead after the 1657 signing of the "Remonstrance".
This paragraph of the original biography is kept intact, but a primary source for this offer of freemanship has not yet been found. It seems very plausible but is as-yet only secondarily sourced.
On May 12, 1664, ...the principles English residents among the Dutch on Long Island were offered citizenship by the Connecticut Assembly, a change of allegiance which never took place. The only Thorne on the Assembly's list is John Thorne of Flushing, without a doubt the second son of William, who is shown to have been in New York City in 1663. John Thorne seems to have been considered the head of the Long Island family, It is, therefore, to be supposed that William Thorne died not later than 1664."[13]
It is possible, but apparently not proven, that William & Susanna were buried with friends and neighbors at the burying ground of the Friend's Meeting House at Flushing but note that they WERE NOT PROVEN QUAKERS (see "Was William Thorn a Quaker?" below).
No will or probate has yet been found for William or Susannah.
In his article "William Thorne and Some of His Descendants" from Oct 1888, Rev. Arthur W. H. Eaton first wrote about this William Thorne[6] followed by another article in Jan 1922.[3]
Eaton, who noted his primary sources, originally thought that William's wife might have been "Sarah"; by 1922 he had proved her name as Susannah. He listed several other Thornes of New England but admits there is no proven relationship amongst them. He also stated that he (Eaton) did not known Thorn's origins and mentioned a 16 Apr 1640 will of Dorothy Rogers of Dedham, Essex, England listing "god child William Thorne" along with three "Peek" (or Peck) family who are also believed to have emigrated to New England. This article is well worth reading although it does not definitively prove other family relationships. The second part of the article appears in NYGBR Vol. 20 pg. 77[14]
Dickinson in his 1965 followup to Eaton[4] opines that William did not likely move to the area of Flushing immediately after 1643, given the amount of Indian massacres which went on there, quoting a letter of 24 Oct 1643 stating that all English settlements there except one had been burned and the inhabitants murdered. The one surviving house was apparently Lady Deborah Moody who founded Gravesend early in 1643. It is important to note that WIlliam Thorne DID NOT APPEAR on the Gravesend patent, or in the few remaining pages of the Gravesend town minutes. Other men from Lynn did, and it is LIKELY that Thorne was granted a lot along with others, but it is NOT PROVEN.
William's religious practice is also not proven. As mentioned earlier, not all signers of the "Flushing Remonstrance" were Quakers. His fine in the 1642/43 court for not reporting for military watch is sometimes given as a proof of Quaker pacifism as they were not generally in New England by that date but may have indicated he was an adherent of Ann Hutchinson who was opposed to the military chaplain of the church of Boston and had persuaded the men of the church to disobey a draft for the Pequot War.[4] Further note that he apparently did not appear in any list of Friends (Quakers) and despite some internet (unsourced) statements to the contrary, it is NOT PROVEN that he is buried in the Friend's burying ground of Flushing.
See also:
Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.
Featured National Park champion connections: William is 13 degrees from Theodore Roosevelt, 17 degrees from Stephanus Johannes Paulus Kruger, 10 degrees from George Catlin, 13 degrees from Marjory Douglas, 18 degrees from Sueko Embrey, 13 degrees from George Grinnell, 24 degrees from Anton Kröller, 13 degrees from Stephen Mather, 20 degrees from Kara McKean, 16 degrees from John Muir, 15 degrees from Victoria Hanover and 22 degrees from Charles Young on our single family tree. Login to find your connection.
T > Thorne > William Thorne Sr.
Categories: Flushing Remonstrance | English of Colonial Long Island | Puritan Great Migration | New Netherland Settlers | New Netherland Project-Managed | PGM Beyond New England
Also, note this in Thorn's bio (edited): Instead of attempting to merge this William Thorn with William Thorne, Sr., (1606 -1664) both of whom now appear as the spouse of Susannah Booth Hallett, born 1612, I am detaching this William Thorn as her spouse. (Patricia Prickett Hickin, 20 November 2018)"
So both William's had the same spouse; instead of merging them, she removed the spouse (BUT NOT THE CHILD). The fact that they had the same spouse is the reason they SHOULD be merged.
My two cents: If Thorn's daughter is removed, there isn't much known about him, and the two might as well (and should) be merged.
A new biography was started because many of the "facts" in the biography are based on things like Gale Research, Edmund West, Find-A-Grave, personal family genealogies, etc.
Truth? I'm baffled. Anyone else who wants to pick up and move forward using legitimate sources... please do.
edited by Cheryl (Aldrich) Skordahl
edited by Brad Stauf
At the top, I indicated sources from Great Migration Directory, including links - to aid in the clean-up. These should be used as inline sources in the biography (include links), then deleted.
If that doesn't work try here: First one, unsourced. https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=Considered+the+progenitor+of+the+Thorne+Family+of+America%2C+William+was+an+Anabaptist.+He+came+to+America+on+10+April+1635%2C+possibly+arriving+on+the+ship+%22Confidence%22+at+age+18+with+Peter+Thorne%2C+believed+to+be+his+brothe
I'm guessing copy/paste, but not positive because the link is broken.
I commented on the home page of the perpetrator (just kidding about the descriptive word :)
Insights?
I'm going to remove the Unsourced template.
Do you have any sources for William? Also, I removed the USA from the death place since there was no USA in 1664.
Regards, Natalie