Elizabeth was born in 1686. Elizabeth Talbot ... She passed away in 1737.
ELIZABETH ANN TALBOT, daughter of John TALBOT and Sarah LOCKYEAR, married Timothy Dalton (Mar 24, 1690-1767) in 1709 in Lunenburg, Virginia. She was born in 1693 in Lunenburg, Virginia, USA.[1]
She died in 1737 in Bedford County, Virginia, USA.
ELIZABETH DALTON was born in 1709 in Lunenburg, Virginia, USA. She died in 1767 in Lunenburg, Virginia, USA. She married (1) JAMES BOBBITT. He was born in 1707 in Prince George, Virginia, USA. He died on 20 Aug 1761 in Halifax, Virginia, USA.
JOHN DALTON was born in 1711. He died in 1787. He married (2) PATIENCE DALTON in 1730 in Bedford County, Virginia, USA. She was born in 1711. She died in 1752 in Bedford County, Virginia, USA.
TIMOTHY DALTON was born in 1715 in Lunenburg, Virginia, USA. He died on 24 Apr 1775 in Bedford County, Virginia, USA. He married (1) ELIZABETH PHILLIPS. She was born in 1709 in Wiltshire, England. She died in 1776 in Bedford County, Virginia, USA.
RICHARD DALTON was born in 1720. He died in 1774.
ROBERT DALTON was born in 1722. He died on 28 Jan 1779 in Pittsylvania County, Virginia. He married (1) MARY KEY. She was born in 1720. She died on 28 Jan 1799.
DAVID DALTON was born in 1725 in Hanover County, VA USA. He died on 06 Jun 1802 in Pittsylvania County, Virginia. He married (1) HANNAH GOAD. She was born on 07 Apr 1725 in Richmond, Virginia. She died in 1804 in Bedford Co., Virginia, USA.
Is Elizabeth your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Elizabeth by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
Mitochondrial DNA test-takers in the direct maternal line:
Talbot-672 and Tolbert-149 appear to represent the same person because: Same name, similar dates. Tolbert-149 is unlinked and essentially empty. Use data from Talbot-672.
Key-2566 and Talbot-672 do not represent the same person because:
Elizabeth Dalton would have been about 58 if the birth date is accurate. There is research on the Key family with that dalton line. I unfortunately do not have documentation either way. So if you do that would be great.
Tolbert-149 and Talbot-672 are not ready to be merged because: Tolbert-129 has no sources except Findagrave; DOB and
DOD are not close. No POD or POB for Tolbert-129. Since 129 has not connections to any other, it could be merged into Tolbert-672 with unsupported date removed from combined profile
Tolbert-149 and Talbot-672 appear to represent the same person because: Tolbert-149 was attached to Timothy Dalton Jr as his wife. I believe it belongs to his mother Elizabeth Talbot Dalton, Talbot-672. She was married to Timothy Dalton Sr not Jr.
Talbot-672 and Talbot-725 do not represent the same person because: think the talbot-725 dates are wrong and no sources. So it is impossible to know if this is a duplicate
Tolbert-216 and Talbot-672 appear to represent the same person because: alternate spelling of last name, both spellings listed on Tolbert-216, same data and family
Talbot-725 and Talbot-672 are not ready to be merged because: Though they seem to be duplicates and Talbot-725 has unsourced Ancestry.com data, Talbot-725 does have specific dates of birth and death that differ significantly from those of Talbot-672, and also has a different place of birth. This needs sorting first. The dates of the children of both profiles (for example Elizabeth Dalton-1817 and Elizabeth Dalton-1576) seem to be the same.
Talbot-725 and Talbot-672 appear to represent the same person because: same name and family, -672 has source for information, -725 does not, only unsourced tree on Ancestry.com
This profile has been identified as a duplicate by Ron Norman, an Arborist. Please review the proposed merge - bottom of the profile on the left. If they are duplicates please approve the merge. If you have questions or would like assistance please ask. Thank you.
This profile has been identified as a duplicate by Ron Norman, an Arborist. Please review the proposed merge - bottom of the profile on the left. If they are duplicates please approve the merge. If you have questions or would like assistance please ask. Thank you.
This profile has been identified as a duplicate by Ron Norman, an Arborist. Please review the proposed merge - bottom of the profile on the left. If they are duplicates please approve the merge. If you have questions or would like assistance please ask. Thank you.
Elizabeth Dalton would have been about 58 if the birth date is accurate. There is research on the Key family with that dalton line. I unfortunately do not have documentation either way. So if you do that would be great.
DOD are not close. No POD or POB for Tolbert-129. Since 129 has not connections to any other, it could be merged into Tolbert-672 with unsupported date removed from combined profile