no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Martha (Tompkins) Foster (abt. 1627 - aft. 1688)

Martha Foster formerly Tompkins aka Adams
Born about in Englandmap [uncertain]
Ancestors ancestors
Daughter of [uncertain] and [uncertain]
Wife of — married 1657 in Salem, Essex County, Massachusettsmap
Wife of — married 16 Nov 1688 in Salem, Massachusettsmap
Descendants descendants
Mother of
Died after after about age 61 in Salem, Essex, Massachusettsmap
Profile last modified | Created 14 Dec 2017
This page has been accessed 939 times.

Contents

Disputed Origins

The various records of Ralph Tompkins and research about him identify no daughter Martha.

Her existence is supported by the following record

"Indenture Richard Adams, yeoman of Salem, and Martha Foster, relict widow of John, lately deceased. 16 Nov 1688, in consideration of a contract and covenant of marriage, etc. gives her his whole estate real personal property, etc providing if she shall have issue by him his estate shall revert to his offspring, otherwise to her children."[1]

This is the record that Torrey must have used to identify "Martha" as both the first wife of John Foster and then the wife of Richard Adams. But there is no explanation for why Torrey (or others) believe she was a Tompkins, much less daughter of Ralph.

While this 1688 marriage contract exists, there is no marriage record in the published Salem vital records.

William Montgomery Clemens reports Martha's first marriage as: "FOSTER, John and Martha Tompkins, 1648, Salem, Mass."[2]

A "Martha Foster" also appears in this 1670 record (but relationship to John Foster not specified):

"The deposition of John Foster Sr aged about fifty-two years saith that being with Aron Read a little before he died when Samuel Eborne asked him whether Joseph Small and he did not go forth as two brothers and he answered yea. yea. Samuel Eborne asked him again whether there were at any time any private grudge between Joseph Small and himself, or whether the said Joseph did shoot him willfully or not. he answered with great affection oh no, no, no and these were the last words he spoke. Taken upon oath 11: 9: 70 Signed Wm Hawthorne assistant

John Tompkins Jr ae twenty-five, Samuel Ebourne ae fifty-eight, Robert Pease ae forty-one, Martha Foster, ae about forty-three each deposed in the same manner. Evidently a case of “I didn’t know the gun was loaded.”[3]


Her age 43 in 1670 calculates to a birth year of 1627. But her relation to John Foster is not given in the 1670 deposition.

We know that Mary Tompkins was baptized in January 1617. We know that there are no Wendover records of an Tompkins after Mary's January 1617 baptism.

We know that Mary Tompkins was age 14 on the 1635, calculating to a 1621 birth. On that 1635 passenger list, there was no child born about 1627, much less named Martha, listed among the children of Ralph Tompkins.

The Miner descent genealogy, referenced above, concludes that Martha must have been a daughter of Ralph's second wife, Hannah Aburne, and therefore, born after 1642, known last date of his first wife Katherine, and that John Foster married first Mary Tompkins, then second, her half sister Martha. BUT, known contemporary documentation places Martha's birth in 1627, while Ralph Tompkins was still married to Katherine.

What's not found (yet) is any evidence that Martha, wife of Richard Adams about 1688, was originally a Tompkins, other than Torrey's supposition. If you find another, solid, source,[4] please add it here. Thank you.

another, secondary, source: Edmund West, comp.. Family Data Collection - Individual Records [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2000. registers: Name: Martha Tompkins Parents: Ralph Tomkins, Hannah Aborne Birth Place: Plymouth, Bridgewater, MA Birth Date: 1625 Marriage Place: Salem, Essex, MA Marriage Date: 1648 Death Place: Essex, MA Death Date: 1688

Biography

Martha was born in 1635. The passenger list on the Truelove on which the family came to Massachusetts in 1635 has "RALPH TOMKINS, Husb - Ae 50; KAT. TOMKINS vxor, Ae 58; ELIZABETH TOMKINS, Ae 18; SAMVEL TOMKINS Ae 22; MARIE TOMKINS Ae 14". Martha married John Foster in Salem about 1645/7.[5] She married, second, Richard Adams in 1688. (This is why her death date appears as after 1688.)[6][7] Birth

based on self reported age in 1670

Marriage

Husband: John Foster
Wife: Martha Tompkins
Marriage:
Date: 1624[8]
Husband: Ralph Tompkins
Wife: Katherine UNKNOWN
Child: Martha Tompkins
Child: John Tompkins
Marriage:
Date: 06 NOV 1608
Place: Buckinghamshire, England[9][10]

Sources

  1. John Foster, in Miner Descent (online tree accessed 25 May 2015), citing Essex deed Vol III, p. 715
  2. American Marriage Records Before 1699
  3. Miner Descent, op cit., citing Essex Deed vol iii folio 99
  4. I.e., NOT the Millennium File, not US & International Marriages, not someone's unsourced family tree
  5. Torrey, Vol. 1, p. 567 under FOSTER, John (-1688). Cites: {Randall Anc. 440; Farr Anc. 282; Salem 2:324; Foster 697; Felton 144; Tingley-Meyers 167; Jones (#5) 4; Reg. ; . 87:287; EIHC 41:181; Dedham Hist. Reg. 6:22, 16:97}
  6. Torrey, Vol. 1, p. 10. under ADAMS, Richard & Martha (TOMPKINS) FOSTER, w John; m cont 16 Nov 1688; Salem {Salem 2:324; Dedham Hist. Reg. 10:97; Essex Ant. 3:46; Foster 695}
  7. Source: #S591 Vol, I, p. 426,
  8. Source: #S591 Vol I, p. 426
  9. Source: #S591
  10. Source: #S587 Page: TOMPKINS, Ralph (1585-1666) & 1/wf Katherine FOSTER (1577-); in Eng, 6 Nov 1608; Dorchester/Bridgewater/Salem ; p. 1529

See also:

  • Frederick Clifton Pierce, Foster genealogy : being the record of the posterity of Reginald Foster, an early inhabitant of Ipswich, in New England..., Chicago: F.C. Pierce, 1899. This appears to be the primary source used by the Miner Descent web site, referenced above.
  • Source: S587 New England Marriages Prior to 1700, by Clarence Almon Torrey (Boston: New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2011)
  • Source: S591 A History of Salem Massachusetts, by Sidney Perley (Sidney Perley, Salem, Mass., 1924)
  • Source: Clemens, William Montgomery. American Marriage Records Before 1699. Pompton Lakes, NJ, USA: Biblio Co., 1926. Page 92

Acknowledgments

  • Thank you to Patricia Sage for creating WikiTree profile Thompkins-33 through the import of SAGE and beyond_2013-02-08.ged on Feb 13, 2013.
  • Thank you to Bennett Rockney for creating WikiTree profile Tompkins-633 through the import of Rockney GEDCOM.ged on Feb 16, 2013.






Is Martha your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of Martha's DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 15

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Although Tompkins-375 was once rejected, both profiles share same parents and siblings. Revisiting rejection or research might be helpful.
posted by Richard Flanagin Jr.
Um... I'm looking at the Essex Deed books-- they're online at salemdeeds.com. You have to dig a bit because the image numbers on the web site don't match the folio numbers given in the citation. Volume III, #99 (supposed location of Martha reporting her age in 1670) is actually on image 311 in Book 3. These are land deeds. There are no depositions in them. So the citation (calling the source a deed book) in the Foster genealogy is inaccurate. There must be some other court records. In any case, we need to find the ORIGINAL depositions, not those published in a genealogy.
posted by Jillaine Smith
BTW, in colonial New England, marrying one's wife's sister was considered almost as bad as incest and was EXTREMELY rare.
posted by Jillaine Smith
Okay... found the origins of "Martha" See http://minerdescent.com/2010/08/05/john-foster-sr/ Researcher there concludes Martha was a (half) sister of Mary and that John Foster m1 Mary; she died, then he m2 Martha. While the name Martha is used in a 1688 document, calling her widow of John Foster and wife of Richard Adams, there's no proof that Ralph and his second wife had any children.
posted by Jillaine Smith
I find no marriage of Richard Adams to Martha Foster in the Salem VR (there's a reference to volume 2, p 324, but there is no relevant info there).
posted by Jillaine Smith
See updated profile of Ralph. No daughter Martha. The daughter most likely to have married John Foster was MARY (aka Marie). Therefore, I am re-proposing the merge of Martha into Mary.
posted by Jillaine Smith
We can handle the first name issue from the data in the narrative. The passenger list calls her Marie. Much closer to Mary than Martha. And Her baptism record calls her Mary. Not sure where Martha came from.
posted by Jillaine Smith
Will one of the PMs please correct the spelling of Martha's LNAB to Tompkins to match the rest of her family and the source documents written about them?
posted by Michele Britton
If Martha is the same person as Marie on the Truelove Passenger list, she was born about 1621. Otherwise, she was born in 1635, as Katherine died that year, shortly after her arrival in America. If the sources are correct that say the Ralph's second wife Hannah Aborne was eight years older than him, she was too old to be the mother of Martha.
posted by Timothy Wilder
Tompkins-1239 and Thompkins-33 are not ready to be merged because: David Sylvester posted that these are unready to be merged due to dispute of who Martha's mother is.
posted by Michele Britton

T  >  Tompkins  |  F  >  Foster  >  Martha (Tompkins) Foster