Mary
Barber
Glascock
formerly Fauntleroy aka Glasscock
Born in Hedley, Hampshire, England
Ancestors 
Daughter of Moore Fauntleroy
and Dorothie (Cole) Fauntleroy
Wife of
Gregory George Glascock
— married
[date unknown] [location unknown]
Wife of
Thomas Hudson
— married
about 1662 in Old Rappahannock, Colony of Virginia
Descendants 
Died about
at about age 34
in Old Rappahannock County, Colony of Virginia
Profile managers:
Dale Gorham 
[send private message], David Eckert [send private message], Karla York [send private message], Tracy McDonald [send private message], and Kathy McGee [send private message]
[send private message], David Eckert [send private message], Karla York [send private message], Tracy McDonald [send private message], and Kathy McGee [send private message]Profile last modified
| Created 20 Jun 2011
This page has been accessed 2,800 times.
Contents |
Biography
Mary Fauntleroy was born around 1635 to Moore Fauntleroy and Dorothy Colle in England.[1]
The birth info on this profile conflicts with parish records researched by Glassco, who writes that Mary was christened 24 Nov 1641 in Hedley, Hampshire, England.[2]. This source supports other facts from Little Neck as well. Other pedigree data also conflicts w this DOB, citing b. Abt. 1641, d. Aft. 1675[3]
Mary married George Glascock in 1667 in Old Rappahannock County, Virginia.[1][4]
Mary died in Virginia in 1676; where she lived became Richmond County in 1692, not to be confused with the City of Richmond, which was in Henrico County.[5][6]
Birth
- 24 Nov 1641, Headley, Hampshire, England[7]
- Mary is cited in her husband Thomas Hudson's will, which was proved on 5 Nov 1679 in Old Rappahannock County, Virginia; therefore, Mary did not die until after that date.
Marriage
18 Jan 1662/67 Rappahannock County, Virginia[citation needed] [Note that an Ancestry citation: US and International Marriage Records, 1560-1900. Yates Publishing. Ancestry.com Operations Inc., needs to be confirmed, as it does not indicate a primary or secondary source is behind the record; it could be from a family group sheet entry, alone.]
Research Notes
- Appertaining to daughter Mary (Hudson) Yates:
- WILL OF HUDSON, THOMAS, 12 June 1679; proved 5 November, 1679. To daughter Mary Yates all my Lands and right to Land in Virginia after me and my wife decease. To daughter Mary Yates one young Mare two cow : yearlings and four sow shoats about six months old with all their increase. Desires that all his just debts be paid and then the remaining part of his Estate to be equally divided between his loving wife Mary & son-in-law Elias Yates and it is my Will that the mare yearlings and shoats above mentioned with their Male and Female increase may remain to my said daughter and her heirs forever. Executor my son-in-law Elias Yates.
Sources
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Source number: 6700.023; Source type: Family group sheet, FGSE, listed as parents; Number of Pages: 1. Yates Publishing. U.S. and International Marriage Records, 1560-1900. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2004.
Name: Mary Fauntleroy, Gender: Female, Birth Place: EN, Birth Year: 1635, Spouse Name: Gregory Glascock, Spouse Birth Place: VA, Spouse Birth Year: 1634, Marriage Year: 1667, Marriage State: VA. - ↑ baptism record from Lawrence A. Glassco, The Glasscock-Glassco Saga (3rd Edition) (Niles, Ohio: Self published, 1975). Hereinafter cited as The Glasscock Saga. baptism, marriage, issue and death are partly transcribed here
- ↑ Mary b. 1641 as dau of Moore Fauntleroy the Elder - b: Abt 1610 in Crondall, ENG, d: 1677
- ↑ Ancestry.com. Virginia, Marriages of the Northern Neck of Virginia, 1649-1800. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2012.
Original data: Headley, Robert K. Married Well and Often: Marriages of the Northern Neck of Virginia, 1649–1800. Baltimore, MD, USA: Genealogical Publishing Co., 2003.
Name: Mary Fauntleroy, Marriage Date: Abt 1667, Spouse Name: Gregory Glascock, Marriage Location: Virginia, United States. - ↑ Ancestry.com. Global, Find A Grave Index for Burials at Sea and other Select Burial Locations, 1300s-Current. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2012.
Original data: Find A Grave. Find A Grave. http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=127328744. - ↑ Ancestry.com. U.S., Find A Grave Index, 1600s-Current. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2012.
Original data: Find A Grave. Find A Grave. http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=127328744. - ↑ "England Births and Christenings, 1538-1975," database, FamilySearch: indexed 11 Feb 2018, Mort Fantleroy in entry for Mary Fantleroy, 24 Nov 1641; citing index based upon data collected by the Genealogical Society of Utah, Salt Lake City; FHL microfilm 991,755.
- Birth Record http://www.johnowensmith.co.uk/baptisms/bapt-F.htm
Acknowledgments
- Barber Fauntleroy-1 was created by Kathy McGee through the import of McGee Family Tree.ged on 1 Dec 2014.
- Thank you to Tracy McDonald for creating WikiTree profile Fauntleroy-27 through the import of McDonaldGedcom.aspx.ged on 24 Jun 2013.
Is Mary your ancestor? Please don't go away!
Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or
ask our community of genealogists a question.
Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Mary by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Mary:
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Mary by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Mary:
-
~0.39%
Suzanne (Clark) Mackler
:
23andMe, GEDmatch ZW7729506 [compare]
+
AncestryDNA, Ancestry member sheepandmountains
+
Family Tree DNA Family Finder
+
MyHeritage DNA
+
Living DNA
-
~0.39%
Jean (Landis) Smith :
AncestryDNA
-
~0.39%
~3.12%
Mary Molloy :
AncestryDNA
-
~0.39%
Gini (Clark) Klein :
Family Tree DNA Family Finder, GEDmatch T346361 [compare], FTDNA kit #625803
-
~0.39%
Travis Hutchinson :
Family Tree DNA Family Finder, FTDNA kit #909432
Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.
- John Fauntleroy father of Mary? 1600s Jun 11, 2018.
Rejected matches › Mary (Unknown) Akin (abt.1640-bef.1675)
Featured National Park champion connections: Mary is 13 degrees from Theodore Roosevelt, 21 degrees from Stephanus Johannes Paulus Kruger, 14 degrees from George Catlin, 14 degrees from Marjory Douglas, 20 degrees from Sueko Embrey, 16 degrees from George Grinnell, 25 degrees from Anton Kröller, 15 degrees from Stephen Mather, 21 degrees from Kara McKean, 14 degrees from John Muir, 16 degrees from Victoria Hanover and 22 degrees from Charles Young on our single family tree. Login to find your connection.
F > Fauntleroy | G > Glascock > Mary Barber (Fauntleroy) Glascock
Find A Grave: Memorial #127328744
Also on Ancestery is the marriage record below: Notes Name: Mary Fauntleroy Gender: Female Birth Place: En Birth Year: 1635 Spouse Name: Gregory Glascock Spouse Birth Place: VA Spouse Birth Year: 1634 Marriage Year: 1667 Number Pages: 1
edited by Lawrence Cunningham
KNOW ALL MEN by these prsents that I WM. FANTLEROY for Twelve thousand five hundred pounds of good sound tobacco & cask in hand secured by Bills or Obligations of GREGORY GLASCOCK have sold unto the abovesaid GREGORY GLASCOCK his heires & assignes all that parcell of land conteyning Four hundred & eighty acres beginning at the miles end of HENRY WILLSONs Corner tree sue bearing S. W. the upper line bounded upon HENRY WILLSON, PAULE WOODBRIDGE, Coll, LEROY GRIFFIN, JOHN NEWMAN together wth: all wayes woods and all other the appertnances belonging To have & to hold unto the aforesaid GREGORY GLASCOCK his heires or assignes forever to all intents & purposes as it became due to me by Pattent, excepted out of the above- said grant his Maties: rent & services due & of right accustomed, I the said WILLIAM FANTLEROY and KATHERINE my Wife doe alsoe hereby confirme and make over unto GREGORY GLASCOCK his heires & assignes all the right and interest of Dower or thirds which I the said KATHERINE FANTLEROY now or hereafter may have in the aforesaid land, and doe hereby warrant the sale from said WM. FANTLEROY my heires & from clayme of any other persons In Witness whereof I have hereunto sett my hands & seales this 4th day of June 1679-1679-1682 Old Rappahannock County, Virginia Will & Deed Book 6, Part II; [Antient Press]; Page 223
KNOW ALL MEN by these pntes that I MOORE FANTLEROYE for & in Consid: of Three thousand pounds of Tobacco & caske to me in hand paid have bargained and sold unto THOMAS HUDSON his heirs three hundred acres of land scytuate lyeing & being on RAPPA. CREEKE Begining at the great Marsh knowne by the name of WOWANDECOMAN &soe running upp the Creeke for Breadth & into the woods wth all rights & priviledges thereunto belonging & do heerby oblidge myself my heirs to give ye sd HUDSON a firme conveyance for the sd lands when he shall Require it. In Witnesse whereof I have hereunto sett my hand & seale this Eleaventh day of Novembr: 1669-1668-1670 Old Rappahannock County, Virginia Deed Book 4, Part I; [Antient Press]; Page 77-78
edited by Robin Lee
edited by [Living Montano]
We might find a lead that would justify placing Mary in Virginia; whereas, The Elder Moore Fauntleroy lived and died in England (and did his daughter Mary Barber Fauntleroy); whereas, notably, The Younger Moore Fauntleroy is the person who migrated to Virginia.
Right now, conflation has happened in Ancestry, on FamilySearch, and on WikiTree. Right now, the vital data for the correct Mary is on her profile (shown as a sister, but I don't think that makes sense: at best, a half-sister or else a cousin).
Please help!
Also note that the Ancestry "citations" above are not qualified citations - if you want to keep them, they should be moved to Research Notes or else (preferably) the original primary or secondary sources to which they should be linkable (or else they are family tree family group sheet entries, and therefore, unsourced) or remove them altogether. Let me know if I can be of help, as right now, I'm mainly focused on Mary Barber Fauntleroy's line, not this collateral (and in reality, shakily defined) one.