no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Elishua (UNKNOWN) Crowell (abt. 1595 - 1688)

Elishua Crowell formerly [surname unknown]
Born about in Englandmap
Daughter of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Wife of — married about 1633 in Englandmap
Descendants descendants
Died at about age 93 in Yarmouth, Barnstable, Province of Massachusetts Baymap
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Puritan Great Migration Project WikiTree private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 20 Aug 2015
This page has been accessed 4,202 times.
The Puritan Great Migration.
Elishua (UNKNOWN) Crowell migrated to New England during the Puritan Great Migration (1621-1640).
Join: Puritan Great Migration Project
Discuss: pgm

Biography

Elishua was the wife of John Crow (Crowell is also used), who emigrated to Charleston, Massachusetts in 1635, and then moved to Yarmouth in Plymouth Colony[1] [2] [3] [1] [4] [5] [3] [6]

There is a theory that she was the daughter of Edward Yelverton and Nazareth (Bedingfield) Yelverton, born circa 1590 in Grimston, Norfolk, England, but this was not confirmed in the sources noted here. Do you have more information? Please discuss on G2G.

Their children included:

  1. Moses was baptized in Charleston, Massachusetts on June 26, 1637, and died young[1] [5] [2] [3] [6]
  2. John, born about 1639, who married Mehitable Miller, daughter of Reverend John Miller[1] [2] [7] [3] [6]
  3. Thomas, born about 1645, who married Agnes[1] [2] [3] [6]
  4. Elizabeth, who married Arthur Perry, Sr. of Boston (a member of the Ancient and Honourable Artillery Company)[1] [6]
  5. Possibly others.
    • Elishua, who married John Gifford[1] [6], is noted as the daughter of John and Elishua in many of the references, however there is evidence Yelverton's daughter[8]
    • Yelverton himself is noted as John's brother in many of the references, however it also appears likely that he was John and Elishua's son, as noted here[8]

John died January 14, 1672-3. His wife Elishua died in 1688[1] [6]

The Genealogies And Estates Of Charlestown, by Thomas Bellows Wyman, says that John Crowe was an "inhabitant of Charlestown in 1635; married Elishua ________, who came to town 1634, and was admitted to the Church, 4 (11) 1634/5."

Elishua Crowe was admitted to Charlestown church on 4 Jan 1634/5 [ChChR8] In the list of those admitted inhabitants of Charlestown in 1634 was "Mrs. Crowe who bought Mr. William Jennings [Jennison] his house at her arrival whose husband Mr. John Crowe arrived here the year following" [ChTR 11, 15].[9]

Sources

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 / John Crowe and His Descendants (New York: Thomas Crowell, 1903) See person #1, page 21
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 The Hamlin Family (1639 to 1902): A Genealogy of James Hamlin of Barnstable, Mass., Eldest Son of James Hamlin, the Immigrant, Who Came from London, England, and Settled in Barnstable, 1639, 2 vols. by Andrews, Henry Franklin (Exira, Iowa: privately printed, 1902). see footnote on page 79
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 A Genealogical Dictionary of the First Settlers of New England by Savage, James A., (Boston: Little, Brown, 1860–62). Volume 1, page 479, 480
  4. Torrey's New England Marriages, Volume 1, page 401 found in the New England Marriages to 1700. (Online database. AmericanAncestors.org. New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2008.) Originally published as: New England Marriages Prior to 1700. Boston, Mass.: New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2015. This reference provides the following sources: Charleston 252; Crowell 25; Hamelin 79; Tobey 22; Sv (Savage) 1:479, 480; Bassett-Preston 73; Cape Cod Library 72:1, 103:101-6
  5. 5.0 5.1 The Genealogies and Estates of Charlestown, 2 vols; by Wyman, Thomas Bellows; (Boston: D. Clapp and Son, 1879) see page 252
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 Genealogical notes of Cape Cod families by Brownson, Lydia B.; Norton, Doris V.; Held, Grace V.; Publication date 1967; Publisher Lydia B. Brownson; Digitizing sponsor Federally funded with LSTA funds through the Massachusetts Board of Library Commissioners. Vol. 15 (Crowell to Curtiss). This open source shows the informaton in the Cape Cod Library (look for CCL notation in the right-hand column) See page 106 for John and Elishua and their children
  7. Tobey (Tobie, Toby) Genealogy: Thomas of Sandwich, and James of Kittery and Their Descendants by Tobey, Rufus Babcock, (Boston: C. H. Pope, 1905). The will of John Crow Jr is reproduced on pages 23-4
  8. 8.0 8.1 Yelverton Crowell of Yarmouth Mass by Stephen W. Gifford Jr, published in Vol 125 (1971) page 231-236, of the New England Historical and Genealogical Register;;. Boston, MA: New England Historic Genealogical Society, 1847-. (Online database: AmericanAncestors.org, New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2001-2013.)
  9. Great Migration 1634-1635, C-F. (Online database. AmericanAncestors.org. New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2008.) Originally published as: The Great Migration, Immigrants to New England, 1634-1635, Volume II, C-F, pp. 245-6, by Robert Charles Anderson, George F. Sanborn, Jr., and Melinde Lutz Sanborn. Boston: New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2001.




Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of Elishua's DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 18

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Image of the page from Anderson's Great Migration is being removed. This material is subject to copyright. See the note at the top of the PGM Reliable Sources page.

Thank you.

posted by GeneJ X
Has anyone managing this profile looked into the possibility that John Crow/Crowell may have had two wives, with the first being a daughter of Edward and Nazareth Yelverton and the second being Elishua (unknown)? John Crow/Crowell's profile contradicts itself, with the main bio stating that he had one wife and the notes section indicating that he had two (with the first of the two wives being a woman who died (and was buried) in Norfolk in 1626 prior to when John immigrated to New England). All of this is just preliminary research, and there's a lot of things I could be missing or incorrect about, but based on what I've researched so far I find the two wives theory to be extremely persuasive.

First and foremost, as Anderson notes in The Great Migration, the gap between the births of John's eldest children (including Yelverton and Elizabeth (Crow) Perry) and his youngest children (including Moses, John, and Thomas) is very large. It's pretty unlikely that the same woman was having kids in both 1615 and 1645. If John had two different wives, the first of whom died prior to his immigration (perhaps in 1626 as the notes section of his profile suggests), then the timeline on all of this would make a lot more sense. For one thing, it would clear up discrepancies about his wife's birthdate. If the Elishua who was having children in the 1630s and 1640s was a second wife, then it would be perfectly conceivable for John's first wife, presumably the wife of John Crow buried in Norfolk in 1626, to have been born in 1590.

Secondly, there is a transcription of an early New England marriage record that lists a 1635 marriage between a John Crow and an Elishua (Unknown), both of Yarmouth. If the date given in this transcription is correct, and if the record is referring to this same couple, then it indicates that John Crow may have married his wife, the "Elishua" of this profile, in 1635 rather than 1615. If John had only one wife, then a 1635 marriage date would be impossible given the estimated birthdates of John's older children, including the birthdate of his son Yelverton. However, if Elishua was John's second wife then a 1635 marriage would not only make sense, it would actually perfectly explain the age gap between John's children.

Overall, I think that the age gap between John's children is enough to warrant serious consideration of the idea that he had two wives and that this profile mistakenly conflates two people. Which of course raises the question of who his first wife is, and of whether she's the daughter of Edward and Nazareth Yelverton as some people have theorized. I don't think it's possible to definitively answer that question at this point, but if I'm correct about John having two wives then I do think that gives more credence to the theory that his first wife was a daughter of Edward and Nazareth.

Yelverton is an incredibly unusual name and while the evidence for John's wife (or in this case first wife) being a Yelverton is circumstantial, I don't think it should be ignored. It honestly seems like more of a stretch to assume she wasn't related than to assume that she was. And if John did indeed have two wives (with the first potentially being the woman who died in Norfolk in 1626) this would clear up some of the reasons to doubt that the first wife was the daughter of Edward and Nazareth Yelverton.

The main objection I've seen to the idea that John Crow's wife was Edward's daughter is that she did not inherit from Edward's son (who would have been her brother) when he died in 1633. And, since everyone was presuming that John Crow's first wife was still alive at that point, this seemed to imply that she wasn't a member of that family. But if she had actually died several years earlier (either in 1626 or, if she's not the woman from Norfolk, at some other time) this would explain why she didn't inherit anything from her brother.

Additionally, if John's first wife in indeed the woman buried in Norfolk in 1626, then this could potentially strengthen the contention that she was a daughter of Edward and Nazareth Yelverton. The notes section of John Crow's profile states the following: "John and Yelverton Crowe, alias Crowel, who both were in Yarmouth, Mass., about 1640, are said, in the Banks MMS, to have come from the vicinity of Carlton Rode, next Old and New Buckenham, South Norfolk. The wife of John Crowe was burried at New Buckenham, Norfolk, 21st day, 3rd month, 1626 (parish register). The daughter of John Crowe was baptized there 21st day, 6 month, 1626 (ibid). She was named 'Nasare' or something close to it; George Gilleland, Vicar at New Buckenham, could not fully decipher this name, he stated in a letter to the contributor dated 27 Feb. 1958. See Edward YELVERTON's wife's name 'Nazareth'"

Whoever compiled the notes on that profile provided the following source: https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QHK-N3YS-9V1?cat=319844%7C which basically gives the same information that the notes section of the profile is summarizing.

Now, I should preface this next bit by saying that we don't know for sure whether John Crow/Crowell came from Norfolk, and thus we don't know whether the John Crow whose wife was buried there was the same person as the immigrant John Crow/Crowell. I also haven't been able to find a birth record for Yelverton Crow (and to my knowledge, nobody else has found one either), so there is no definitive evidence that he was born in Norfolk. But the idea that John Crow and his son, Yelverton Crow, are from Norfolk seems fairly likely, especially since (in a search of records that are available online) I could only find a few records of people living in England in that time period (i.e. about 1580 to 1620) with the surname "Yelverton," and all of the ones I could find are from Norfolk (where Edward Yelverton and the other Yelverton's of the same family lived).

If the source listed in the notes section on John's page is accurate (and if it does indeed refer to the John Crow/Crowell who later immigrated to New England) then John Crow and his potential first wife (the woman who was buried in Norfolk in 1626) had a daughter who was baptized in 1626 in the same Parish who was named "Nasare" or something similar. "Nasare" is closer to "Nazareth," than to any other possible name I can think of. And, like Yelverton, Nazareth is a very unusual name. So if "Nasare" was indeed a child of the immigrant John Crow and his first wife, that provides some strong circumstantial evidence in favor of his wife's parents being Edward and Nazareth.

Ultimately, however, the question here isn't whether John's first wife was a Yelverton. The question is whether he had two wives. And I think there's definitely enough evidence to justify the belief that he did.

posted by Sarah H.
It might be a good idea to post this question on the G2G forum. Posted there it will get more viewers than posted here. I have seen excellent information come out of such posts.

If you look at the sources on this profile, and on John's, it appears that the conundrum has been researched by some very knowledgeable people, without certainty. But that doesn't mean that it isn't worthy of further research...

posted by S (Hill) Willson
I find the case as put by Sarah H. (and by John G. Hunt, author of the linked FamilySearch source) fairly persuasive, but would note for the record that a search of burials in England between 1590 and 1626 shows that there were Yelvertons in Somerset, Northamptonshire, and Middlesex as well as Norfolk in that time period. So there may be more ground, both figuratively and literally, left to cover.
posted by Christopher Childs
Thank you for pointing this out! I had been searching online databases of births and marriages, and completely overlooked searches for burials of people with the name (my initial search was also less in-depth than I'd usually like to do since I haven't had time lately to fully dive into the issue, so I mainly limited my search to plugging the name into various records databases and combing through the results).

Personally, I'm entirely persuaded that John had two wives, because honestly in my opinion that's proven simply by the age gaps between his older children and his younger children. But, while I do find the circumstantial evidence to be fairly strong, the question of whether his first wife was a Yelverton (and perhaps the woman buried in Norfolk) still definitely needs further research.

posted by Sarah H.
Thanks for your response! Posting to G2G sounds like a good idea! I'm still fairly new to Wikitree and am not entirely sure how things work with profiles like this one that are part of the PGM project, or what the best way is for someone not involved in the project to suggest an addition to the content on a profile. As of right now this page doesn't discuss the possibility of John having two wives or even mention Anderson's note about the age differences between the children, and I think that there is enough information to justify this issue being mentioned on the page. And while the page mentions the Yelverton controversy, it doesn't really lay out the potential evidence/arguments both for and against the idea that John was married to a Yelverton. So I was hoping that by commenting I might be able to ask whoever is managing the profile to add a section on these topics.

Based on your response, it sounds like a better and effective way to do that would be to ask a question on the G2G forum, so I will plan to post this there! Thanks again for letting me know!

posted by Sarah H.
She should be merged with Unknown-290097 and have her parents removed. Also, she did not live to be 98 years old, I would remove her birth date. She was prob. 16-21 years old in 1634.
posted by Kirk Hess
UNKNOWN-290097 and Yelverton-37 appear to represent the same person because: She has the same first name, son and death date. Merges are also proposed for her duplicate son, which will be difficult to complete with different mothers, so I'm suggesting these be merged also.
posted by Laurie Giffin
DB Errors Project:

Check the data. A mother's birth date should not be more than 67 years before the birth date of one of her children. A mother's death date should not be before one of her children's birth dates.

posted by Bobbie (Madison) Hall
Yelverton-119 and Yelverton-37 appear to represent the same person because: Similar name, similar parents
posted by Bob Tonsmeire
Yelverton Crowell-1 and Yelverton-37 appear to represent the same person because: Similar name, similar details
posted by Bob Tonsmeire
Miller-11542 and Yelverton-37 appear to represent the same person because: Removed rejected match and reinstated match. The Elishua who married John Crow (Crowe, Crowell) as described in the bio for Miller-11542 is portrayed here as Yelverton-37. Note the same death dates and that the birth date shown for Miller-11542 is an supported estimate.
posted by Bob Tonsmeire
UNKNOWN-74591 and Yelverton-37 appear to represent the same person because: same name, same husband
posted by Bob Tonsmeire
Unknown-228125 and Yelverton-37 appear to represent the same person because: Same first name, same husband, same dates
posted by Bob Tonsmeire
Miller-15289 and Miller-11542 do not represent the same person because: different birth dates/places, spouses and children
Rich, I've disconnected Elishua from her purported parents as there is no response from you, and the source link to ancestry is a broken one. I find no source to confirm her relationship to John Miller-3642 and Lydia Combs-71.
posted by Bobbie (Madison) Hall

[Do you know Elishua's family name?]  |  C  >  Crowell  >  Elishua (UNKNOWN) Crowell

Categories: Puritan Great Migration