no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Goosen Sybrantse (Van Schaick) Van Schayck (abt. 1677 - 1725)

Goosen Sybrantse Van Schayck formerly Van Schaick
Born about [location unknown]
Ancestors ancestors
Husband of — married 10 Dec 1699 (to 1725) in Reformed Dutch Church of Albanymap
Descendants descendants
Died at about age 48 [location unknown]
Profile last modified | Created 16 Sep 2011
This page has been accessed 594 times.
{{{image-caption}}}
Goosen Sybrantse (Van Schaick) Van Schayck was a New Netherland Descendant 1674-1776.
Join: New Netherland Settlers Project
Discuss: new_netherland

Contents

Biography

Birth

1677

Church Records

Marriage:

1699 10 Dec; Goosen Van Schayk, ym; Catharina Staats, yd both of Albany [1]

Find A Grave

Goosen Van Schaick Birth: 1677, Death: Mar. 29, 1725
Burial: Albany Rural Cemetery Menands, Albany County, New York, USAPlot: church yard [2]

Sources

  1. Ancestral curios [http://www.ancestralcurios.com/albany_marriages.htm Albany DRC Marriages 1683-1724]
  2. Created by: Colleen; Record added: Feb 02, 2012; Find A Grave Memorial# 84357627; URL: http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=84357627

Acknowledgements

  • WikiTree profile Van Schaick-32 created through the import of JKD1.ged on Sep 15, 2011 by Richard Draper.




Is Goosen Sybrantse your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of Goosen Sybrantse's DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 4

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Van Schaick-65 and Van Schaick-32 appear to represent the same person because: This is the oldest paternal ancestor in this chain in need of a merge. No tree conflicts. Thanks!
posted by Steven Mix
I agree that the merge needs to happen, but shouldn't we complete the mother merge first? I am setting this as an "unmerged match" just for a few days in case I forget to come back to this. I would like to see the mother merged first. Thank you very much for bringing this merge to our attention. Let's revisit it as soon as we get the mother merged.  :-)

Richard

posted by Richard Hollenbeck
Van Schaick-65 and Van Schaick-32 appear to represent the same person because: Both profile represent the same person and need to be merged.

There is a pending merge for the mother.

posted by Tom Quick
I think this needs to be merged with Van_Schiack-65. They are the same individual.

Rejected matches › Gosen van Schayk (bef.1696-)