no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Elizabeth Hoge (Vance) Hatfield (1742 - 1778)

Elizabeth Hoge "Deliz" Hatfield formerly Vance
Born in Isle of Wight County, Colony of Virginiamap
Ancestors ancestors
Daughter of [uncertain] and [uncertain]
Wife of — married 1763 in Russell County, Colony of Virginiamap
Descendants descendants
Died at age 36 in Washington County, Virginia, USAmap
Profile last modified | Created 13 Dec 2020
This page has been accessed 2,186 times.
This profile lacks source information. Please add sources that support the facts.
US Southern Colonies.
Elizabeth (Vance) Hatfield resided in the Southern Colonies in North America before 1776.
Join: US Southern Colonies Project
Discuss: southern_colonies

Biography

Elizabeth Hoge "Deliz" Vance was born 1745 (or January 1742[citation needed]) in Isle of Wight County, Virginia.[1] Her parents are Ephraim Vance and Theodosia Hewlings.[citation needed]

Elizabeth married about 1764 (or 1763[citation needed]) in Washington, Russell County, Virginia to Joseph Hatfield (abt.1740-1832).[1]

She passed away November 1778 (or 29 October 1778[citation needed]) and was buried at Valley View Church Cemetery in Washington County, Virginia.[1]

Her widowed husband Joseph remarried 28 October 1779 to Rachel Smith.

Children

See Geneanet Community Trees Index:[2]

  1. Ephraim "Eaf of All" Hatfield (1765-1847)
  2. Valentine Hatfield (abt.1767-abt.1840)
  3. Mary E (Hatfield) Patrick (1763-abt.1835)
  4. George Hatfield (abt.1770-)
  5. Andrew Warren Hatfield (1776-1854)
  6. Joseph Hatfield (1777-1820)
  7. Alexander "Ale" D. Hatfield (1778-1841)

Sources

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Find A Grave: Memorial #92636884 for Elizabeth Deliz Vance Hatfield (1745–1778) (memorial only, no gravestone photo; unsourced).
  2. Geneanet Community Trees Index [broken link: We're sorry, this page is no longer available.]

See also - other family trees:

  • Ancestry Profile for Elizabeth Deliz Smith Vance (1742–1778).
  • MyHeritage.com search for Elizabeth Vance, b. 1742, Isle of Wight, Virginia returns many trees with this person.




Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Elizabeth by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Elizabeth:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 9

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Deliz Vance-1 and Vance-4852 appear to represent the same person because: dups with same parents and mention same husband
posted by N Gauthier
Vause-79 and Vance-4852 appear to represent the same person because: dups with same husband. Vause appears to be a misreading of her maiden surname since the other profile has Vance parents.
posted by N Gauthier
Vause-79 and Vance-2490 appear to represent the same person because: Same spouse and exact date of death

Difference in dates to be noted in the biography until a source can be added.

posted on Vause-79 (merged) by Esmé (Pieterse) van der Westhuizen
Vance-375 and Vause-79 appear to represent the same person because: Duplicate profiles.
posted on Vause-79 (merged) by Karen (Old) Panek
Vance-1771 and Vance-375 appear to represent the same person because: same dates and husband
posted on Vause-79 (merged) by Robin Lee
Vance-1774 and Vance-375 appear to represent the same person because: same dates and husband
posted on Vause-79 (merged) by Robin Lee
Vance-1006 and Vance-1468 should be considered an unmerged match. The birthdates are often off. Unless you have a sibling that was named Elizabeth I recommend unmerged match. The last names are the same. Death date same, birth place Virginia. Why not merge them and then correct the last name.
posted on Vause-79 (merged) by Sheri Havens
Vance-1006 and Vance-1468 do not represent the same person because: vance-1006 maiden name should be Vause since her parents and siblings are going by that surname. The birthdates are 5 years apart. These are different people and should not be merged.
posted on Vause-79 (merged) by [Living Stewart]
Sheri; the maiden name of Elizabeth should be Vause since her parents and siblings are going by that surname.

Please correct it.

posted on Vause-79 (merged) by [Living Stewart]

V  >  Vance  |  H  >  Hatfield  >  Elizabeth Hoge (Vance) Hatfield

Categories: Unsourced Profiles | US Southern Colonies, Unsourced Profiles | Virginia, Unsourced Profiles | Virginia Colonists