no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

George Vaughan (abt. 1593 - abt. 1649)

George Vaughan aka Vaughn
Born about in Englandmap [uncertain]
Son of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
[spouse(s) unknown]
Descendants descendants
Father of
Died about at about age 56 in London, Englandmap [uncertain]
Profile last modified | Created 15 Sep 2015
This page has been accessed 1,577 times.
The Puritan Great Migration.
George Vaughan migrated to New England during the Puritan Great Migration (1621-1640). (See Great Migration Begins, by R. C. Anderson, Vol. 3, p. 1875)
Join: Puritan Great Migration Project
Discuss: pgm

Contents

Disputed Origins

The birth and death dates and places for George Vaughan, as well as his parentage, are unknown. An estimation of his birth is 1593 in England; his death 1649 in London, England. This profile was erroneously attached as the son of Sir Walter Vaughn and his wife Margaret (Norton) Vaughn . If new information comes to light that indicates this relationship should not have been severed, they may certainly be reattached; however do not reattach without discussion in the comment section below. Thank you. See Research Notes toward the bottom of this profile for additional information.

Biography

Puritan Great Migration
George Vaughan immigrated to New England between 1621 and 1640 and later departed for London, England.

Three documents place George Vaughan in New England by the summer of 1631, as well as clarify that he departed for his homeland, England, in early July 1633. They are :[1]

  1. A witness of the Lewis and Bonython patent, June 28, 1631.[2]
  2. A letter from the London merchants dated April 18, 1632 to "Mr. George Vaughan" telling him of items of trade being sent on the John.[3]
  3. Ambrose Gibbons inventoried the goods left by "Mr. George Vaughan" in July of 1633. Gibbons wrote to the London merchants about the goods on July 13, 1633 and said more information would be known by Mr. Vaughan.[4]George Vaughan received furs delivered to him by Ambrose Gibbons on July 6, 1633, "for the use of the Adventurers of Laconia."[5]

It is probable that when George Vaughan left New England in July 1633, he was on the same ship as Walter Neale and Thomas Wiggin.[1]

Anderson in "Great Migration Begins" in the comment section of George Vaughn's sketch says, "George Vaughan appears as a witness to the so-called Wheelwright deed of 1629, which has been shown to be a forgery, and also was supposed to have written a letter from Boston in 1634 (when he was certainly in England), and this letter and another of 1636[6] are part of the Wheelwright forgery plot."[1][7]

Research Notes

  • Regarding this George Vaughan who migrated in 1631 and departed to England in 1633, Mary Lovering Holman said, "...It has been considered possible that both William and George Vaughan were his sons and possibly John Vaughan of Rhode Island was also of the same Family."[8]
  • Regarding the Wheelwright forgery plot, R. C. Anderson in "The Great Migration Newsletter" writes about the six forged documents presented in a list of those sent over to the "Laconia and Mason Plantations" in the book by Noyse, Libby "The Genealogical Dictionary of Maine and New Hampshire." He indicates the Gibbons papers are published on ages 63 - 102 in New Hampshire Provincial Papers, Volume 1.[9]Anderson believes Document #17 (pp 83-86) is forged. He also believes #24 (p. 95) which is a letter to from George Vaughan to Ambrose Gibbons is forged and says "In the cover letter Vaughan states that he had found the enclosed while going over his papers, and sends it along in case Gibbons might be interested. This comes across as altogether too convenient, and in addition there is evidence that Vaughan was already in England when he supposedly wrote this letter from Boston." Anderson goes on to mention a second letter from Vaughan to Gibbons, in the same hand, dated two years later, which tends to support the Mason heir's claim to the New Hampshire land, "too neatly to be believeable." Anderson also mentions here in the GM Newsletter that he believes the Wheelwright deed of 1629 is forged.[10]
  • All the known records relating to this profile's George Vaughan are contained in the "Gibbons Papers." As mentioned above, a number of those have been determined to be forgeries created to support Capt. John Mason's claim to New Hampshire.
  • Another useful source for info about George Vaughan is Dean's 1887 extensive biography of Capt. John Mason, which contains transcriptions of many of the records relating to George, as well as citations to the NH Provincial Papers. https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=hvd.hn3tck&view=1up&seq=524
  • The sources establish that George was a "factor" hired by the Laconia Company to take English goods (clothing) and trade them for fur/pelts. George is in fact expressly referred to the company's factor in a record transcribed on p 309-310 of Dean's book: https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=hvd.hn3tck&view=1up&seq=344
  • George may well have been a member of one of the London trade guilds related to the clothing trade (eg Merchant Taylors, Drapers, or Clothworkers). The letter by Mason, Gardiner and Eyre to George states that cloth given to George was made into clothing by George's taylor. https://archive.org/details/provincialpapers00boutrich/page/66/mode/1up George, therefore, although (at least by that time) not a practicing taylor himself, seems to have been associated with the clothing/tayloring trade. A search of the online apprenticeship records of the London livery companies (which records include those for the Drapers and Clothworkers but not the Merchant Taylors), shows a large number of Vaughans who were members of the Drapers or Clothworkers. See https://www.londonroll.org/search/?vb=lr&vw=ps&st=0&rf=company%3Abwy%2Cclw%2Cdrp%2Cfnd%2Cgdl%2Cgsm%2Cmrc%2Cmus%2Cslt%2CSTN%2Ctch%7Csurname%3Avaughan%7Cyear_start%3A1550%7Cyear_finish%3A1650 Most notably (on p2 of the search results, a George Vaughan who became a new freeman in the Company of Clothworkers in 1611 and (on p3) took an apprentice himself in 1613. It is possible that those records relate to this profile's George Vaughan. A search of the apprenticeship/membership records of Company Merchant Taylors might also be worthwhile. Their records are available on familysearch.org, but only at Family History Libraries. https://www.familysearch.org/search/catalog/1176350?availability=Family%20History%20Library
  • There were a large number Vaughan's who received marriage licenses in London in the late 1500s and in the 1600s. There were both gentlemen and men of commerce/professions. See https://archive.org/details/londonmarriageli00fost/page/n719/mode/2up?q=vaughan
  • Based on the fact that George was apparently a responsible/trusted agent for the Laconia Company in 1631-1633. He was probably born sometime in 1580-1605, most likely in 1585-1600. A search in July 2020 on familysearch.org, for George Vaughans born in 1580-1605 finds 4 matching records: George, son of Phillip, bpt 1591 in Herefordshire; George, son of Robert, bpt. 1594 in London; George, son of Henry, bpt 1602 in Shropshire; and George, son of John, bpt 1603 in Herefordshire. Of these, I think the London record most promising. There were probably at least as many other George Vaughns born during that time period for which records are not currently available online. It was a fairly common name.
  • Curiously, there was a later George Vaughan, who was Lt Gov of NH in the early 1700s. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Vaughan_(New_Hampshire). Geni says he was son of William (b. 1640 in West Sussex), who was son of George (b. 1615 in Glamorgan, Wales - too young to be this George), who was son of Roger (b. Glamorgan 1587).https://www.geni.com/people/George-Vaughan/6000000005091566368 Wikitree only has George and his father William: https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Vaughan-2739 The 2 George Vaughan's may just be coincidence; no known link; but worth checking.

Sources

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 The Great Migration Begins: Immigrants to New England 1620-1633, Volumes I-III. (Online database: AmericanAncestors.org, New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2010), (Originally Published as: New England Historic Genealogical Society. Robert Charles Anderson, The Great Migration Begins: Immigrants to New England 1620-1633, Volumes I-III, 3 vols., 1995). Sketch of George Vaughn. p. 1875.subscription needed
  2. GMB citing "York Deeds" Vol. 2.see at google.com
  3. GMB, citing "Provincial Papers. Documents and records relating to the province of New-Hampshire" Vol. 1, p. 66, 67.see at archive.org
  4. GMB citing "Provincial Papers. Documents and records relating to the province of New-Hampshire" Vol. 1, pp 73, 74.see at archive.org.
  5. GMB citing "Provincial Papers. Documents and records relating to the province of New-Hampshire" Vol. 2, pp 557, 558.see at archive.org
  6. GMB citing "Provincial Papers. Documents and records relating to the province of New-Hampshire" Vol. 1, p. 37; 59-60; 95-98.see at archive.org
  7. GMB citing Savage "History of New England" Vol. 1, pp 486-514.see at google.com
  8. Holman, Mary Lovering. "George Vaughan of Middleborough, Mass." The American Genealogist. Vol. 23 (1946), pp 24-32. Link to pages at americanancestors.com (subscription needed).
  9. GMB citing "Provincial Papers. Documents and records relating to the province of New-Hampshire" Vol. 1, pp 63-102.see at archive.org
  10. Great Migration Newsletter, V.1-20.(Online Database: AmericanAncestors.org, New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2018.) R. C. Anderson. "Forged Documents" p. 30.subscriber$




Is George your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of George's DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 15

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Vaughan Sr.-2 and Vaughan-1996 appear to represent the same person because: Please merge clear duplicates.
posted by Bobbie (Madison) Hall
PGM Leader, please PPP this profile. See disputed origin paragraph. Thank you.
Hello all, this profile has been added to the Puritan Great Migration Project, since George Vaughan migrated prior to 1640; also to the sub-project, PGM Beyond New England since he transitioned back to his homeland.

I've written a "disputed origins" paragraph and now I'll proceed to detach him as the son of Sir Walter Vaughn and his wife Margaret (Norton) Vaughn. Please see the in-depth research notes for further enlightenment.

I understand that you, Rev. Daniel Jones, would prefer to keep the familial attachment, dispite the reasonable evidence against it. But since (as Chase says below) we don't want to promote fiction, I am moving forward with detachment after reading the additional Research Notes.

Personally, unless there is specific evidence that the shown parent's are not correct, I would prefer that we leave them as is .... pretty much the same for the b. and d. dates, replacing the b. date with another guess does not seem to be any more correct?

A disputed origin section can certainly still be written.

posted by Rev Daniel Washburn Jones
edited by Rev Daniel Washburn Jones
Dan - There must be some reasonable evidence to support the parentage and dates. Otherwise we are just promoting fiction. I'll try to dig deeper today to see if there is any evidence either for or against.
posted by Chase Ashley
edited by Chase Ashley
It turns out that Walter Vaughn did have a son named George. However, he was a royalist aristocrat who died without issue. I created a profile for him: Vaughn-5847. I find it unlikely that a royalist aristocrat would have dropped by the Puritan Massachusetts Bay Colony for a few years in the 1630s to trade in furs, and there is no evidence that he did so. Since it seems highly probable that they were different people, rather than merging them (as we should if we thought they were both the son of Walter Vaughn), the parentage of this one should be disconnected and a section on disputed parentage added. In any event, since Walter's on George died childless, he was definitely not an ancestor of George Vaughn of Middlesborough.
posted by Chase Ashley
Rev. Daniel and all...

I look carefully at all the sources including all those cited by R. C. Anderson in his Great Migration Begins (note citations in the biography)

I'm reporting that I found:

  1. no date nor place of birth,
  2. no death date,
  3. no parent names.

It is my recommendation we make the

  1. dob: 1606, making him 25 years of age when he migrated, because there is no mention of wife or children.
  2. dod: leave it blank
  3. parents: detach the unsourced parents with a note on the 3 profiles.

Would you agree to this? please?

Then I will write a disputed origin section and the Puritan Great Migration Project can protect the profile (PPP).

Thanks.

That makes sense, based on what I know so far (without having personally looked at the sources or done my own research). I'll try to dig deeper today to see if I can find any evidence for or against.
posted by Chase Ashley
Thank you Chase, I appreciate a 2nd set of eyes.
It turns out that Walter Vaughn did have a son named George. However, he was a royalist aristocrat who died without issue. I created a profile for him: Vaughn-5847. I find it very unlikely that a royalist aristocrat would have dropped by the Puritan Massachusetts Bay Colony for a few years in the 1630s to trade in furs, and there is no evidence that he did so. Since it seems highly probable that they were different people, rather than merging them (as we should if we thought they were both the son of Walter Vaughn), the parentage of this one should be disconnected and a section on disputed parentage added. In any event, since he died childless, he was definitely not an ancestor of George Vaughn of Middlesborough.
posted by Chase Ashley
edited by Chase Ashley
Hello Rev. Washburn and Michael Ford, PMs,

I'm working on behalf of the Puritan Great Migration Project, specifically with those who migrated to New England between 1621-1640 and then moved on to live some place else. I saw your note about his migration to the colonies being unknown... as well as your notation about TAG23.

George Vaughan, is named on page 349 of The Great Migration Directory. He migrated in 1631 to Piscataqua and returned permanently to England in 1633. There is a short sketch for him in "The Great Migration Begins."

I'm of the assumption that this profile represents the same George Vaughan. Are you?

I would like to update this profile to represent him, adding PGM project and PGM Beyond.

Are you in agreement?

posted by Cheryl (Aldrich) Skordahl
edited by Cheryl (Aldrich) Skordahl
Sounds fine Cheryl, please also include the "short sketch" you mentioned.

Thank you, Dan

Thanks Rev. Daniel..................
Cheryl - This profile links back to royal ancestry through both of his "parents." I suspect that both connections are entirely unsupported, as virtually nothing is known about George.
posted by Chase Ashley
edited by Chase Ashley
Thanks for the "heads up" about his parentage, Chase. I'll dig in and see what comes up.

V  >  Vaughan  >  George Vaughan

Categories: Puritan Great Migration | PGM Beyond New England