1085: disinherited by the council of Barons of France because of his mental illness. Adelaide and her husband succeeded to the Counties of Vermandois and Valois.
p. HENRI I, King of France m.2 Anna Iaroslavna of Kiev (1057-Tarsus in Cilicia 18 Oct 1102, bur Tarsus church of St Paul). Comte de Vermandois et de Valois by right of his wife. Leader of the French contingent in the First Crusade Aug 1096 returning to France after the victory of Antioch 1098 to raise another army. He set out again Mar 1101 but died from wounds received fighting the Greeks at Tarsus in Cilicia.
p. HUGUES de Clermont [en-Beauvaisis] dit de Mouchy & Marguerite de Roucy [Montdidier]; titled Comte after marriage [1365].
Royal Ancestry by Douglas Richardson Vol. V. page 268
fmg.ac
Wikipedia
The Royal Line, by Albert F Schmuhl, March, 1929 NYC, Rev. March 1980
Royal and Noble Genealogical Data by Brian Tompsett, Copyright 1994-2001, Version March 25, 2001, http://www.dcs.hull.ac.uk/public/genealogy/GEDCOM.html, Department of Computer Science, University of Hull, Hull, UK, HU6 7RX
Is Adelaide your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
No the 'genealogical lineages' comment it's just a standard sentence you see on some profiles, can't remember if it's added by someone or relates to The Royal Line source (which in no way can be described as Good, nor Royal and Noble Genealogical Data as Excellent). She is the last Carolingian of the family of Counts of Vermandois and I presume that is what that statement refers to?
The Count of Meulan and de Warenne marriages are actually those of her daughter Isabelle/Elisabeth but it is very confusing.
I'll see if I have time this weekend or in Christmas/New Year period to clean it up.
Shirlea I presume the comment about "genealogical lineages" refers to inheritances and male lines, but I have no idea how this sentence (in the sources section) is meant to apply in the article, which I think needs work. Perhaps it is related to the sentence "last member of Carolingian dynasty". How she can be defined this way is unclear and should be explained.
I also notice two marriages are the first marriage, for example. The article overall is opaque including the sources.
Capet-160 and Vermandois-339 do not represent the same person because: One is male and the other is female. From looking at them Capet-160 is the husband of the other Vermandois-339. I think that there is another match for Vermandois-339 but it is not this one.
The Count of Meulan and de Warenne marriages are actually those of her daughter Isabelle/Elisabeth but it is very confusing.
I'll see if I have time this weekend or in Christmas/New Year period to clean it up.
I also notice two marriages are the first marriage, for example. The article overall is opaque including the sources.
"Genealogical lineages may not always be from father to son, especially Houses of Kings"