no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Katarina Janse Vroman (bef. 1701 - 1755)

Katarina Janse (Catharina) "Catarina, Catrina" Vroman aka Vrooman, Mebie
Born before in Schenectady, New Yorkmap
Ancestors ancestors
Wife of — married 7 Aug 1725 in Schenectady, Albany County, Province of New Yorkmap
Descendants descendants
Died after age 53 in Schenectady, Schenectady, New Yorkmap
Profile last modified | Created 29 Dec 2016
This page has been accessed 306 times.
{{{image-caption}}}
Catharina Vroman was a New Netherland Descendant 1674-1776.
Join: New Netherland Settlers Project
Discuss: new_netherland

Biography

Katarina, daughter of Jan Vroman (Jan Hendrickse Vrooman) and Gesa Simons (Geesie Veeder), was baptized in the Reformed Dutch Church of Schenectady, New York, on 1 June 1701. Witnesses were Pieter Simons (Veeder) and Susana Meinderts Wemp.[1][2]

Catrina / Katarina married Jacob Mebie and had 6 children.

Note: Jacob Mebie husband. Anna Mabee daughter. Geesie Mabie daughter. Margrieta Mabie daughter. Gazina Mabie daughter. Jan Mebie son. Cornelis Mabie son. Petrus Mabie son. John Mabie son. Capt. Hendrick Adamse Vrooman father. Marytje 'Maria' Wemple mother. Jannetje (Jane) Vrooman sister.

Sources

  1. Extracts from the Doop-Boek or Baptismal Record of the Reformed Protestant Dutch Church of Schenectady, N.Y. p. 11: 1701. Juni 1. Katarina, Jan Vroman, Gesa Simons [Veeder]. Pieter Simons [Veeder], Susana Meinderts Wemp.
  2. One profile gave her baptism date as 12 May 1701, citing Schenectady Baptisms on Ancestral Curios website. The source of that 12 May date has not been determined.

Acknowledgments

  • Thank you to Al Adams for creating WikiTree profile Vrooman-220 through the import of 3206623.ged on Dec 6, 2013. Click to the Changes page for the details of edits by Al and others.
  • WikiTree profile Vromman-1 created through the import of Vicki Norman family tree v2 (3).ged on Aug 1, 2012 by Vicki Norman. See the Changes page for the details of edits by Vicki and others.






Is Catharina your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of Catharina's DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 5

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Vrooman-298 and Vroman-105 appear to represent the same person because: Nothing else in the Vrooman-298 profile (parents, husband, kids) is consistent with this being a person born in 1742, and a search on Ancestry found no indication that anyone believes some other Catrina Vrooman was born that year, so I removed that birthdate as erroneous.

The parents, husband, and kids are all consistent with the biography of Vroman-105.

Please merge -- and use Vroman as the LNAB (see profile message on Vroman-105 and baptism record in that profile).

posted by Ellen Smith
Vrooman-298 and Vroman-105 appear to represent the same person because: Nothing else in the Vrooman-298 profile (parents, husband, kids) is consistent with this being a person born in 1742, and a search on Ancestry found no indication that anyone believes some other Catrina Vrooman was born that year, so I removed that birthdate as erroneous.

The parents, husband, and kids are all consistent with the biography of Vroman-105.

Please merge -- and use Vroman as the LNAB (see profile message on Vroman-105 and baptism record in that profile).

posted by Ellen Smith
Genealogies of the Descendants of the First Settlers of Schenectady has Caterina born in 1701, and Jacob Mabie (Mebie-37)'s wife is Vroman-105.
posted by Tracy Lawrence
Vrooman-220 and Vroman-105 appear to represent the same person because: Duplicate person, same husband and parents.
posted by Tracy Lawrence
Sorry I didn't notice this sooner, but this woman is too young to be the daughter of the parents she is currently attached to. A woman who was born circa 1660 could not have had a baby in 1742. It appears to me that Catharina Vrooman born in 1701 could have been their daughter, but this Catrina belonged to a later generation of Vroomans.

UPDATED: I now see that when I first saw this profile (as Vromman-1), it didn't have a birthdate. Examination of the family members indicates that this is supposed to be the woman born in 1701, but the 1742 birthdate possibly was added by mistake.

posted by Ellen Smith