no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Anne (Upham) Tate (abt. 1664)

Anne Tate formerly Upham
Born about in St Peters, New Kent, Virginiamap
Daughter of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Wife of — married 1685 in St Peters Parish, New Kent, Virginiamap
Descendants descendants
Died [date unknown] [location unknown]
Profile last modified | Created 16 Jan 2012
This page has been accessed 1,629 times.
This profile lacks source information. Please add sources that support the facts.
This person may not belong in the family group. See the text for details.
The Birth Date is a rough estimate. See the text for details.

Biography

Ann was born about 1662. She passed away about 1743.

Research Notes

The Family from England to Tennessee by Roy Schild and Dola Tylor has no sources, Page 2 has both of the following entries: Generation 3 - #3 James Tate, b 1638 married 1st Anne Upham abt 1660, 2nd Anne Waddy abt 1685. Generation 4 - #4 James Tate, b abt 1662, married Anne Waddy abt 1685 (parents listed for Anne Waddy are Samuel Waddy and Ann Craighill)

Sources

See also:





Is Anne your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Anne by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Anne:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 15

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Waddy-152 and Upham-166 are not ready to be merged because: I think before these can be merged, the spouses data needs to be corrected. The birth dates are not correct.
posted by Jean (Blake) Timmons
Upham-166 and Waddy-152 appear to represent the same person because: These two pages represent the same person, i.e., the wife of James Tate. LNAB should be changed to unknown.
posted by V Pounders
Upham-166 and Waddy-152 do not represent the same person because: See research notes. They probably have different husbands.
posted by JJ Stratton
Waddy-152 and Upham-166 appear to represent the same person because: Sources differ on maiden name being Waddy or Upham, but they are intended to be the same person with duplicated spouse, child, and similar dates.

Limited sourcing, other than family trees. Some sources state James married both women. Some sources state James, b 1638 married Anne Waddy, also.

The Family from England to Tennessee by Roy Schild and Dola Tylor has no sources, Page 2 has both of the following entries:
  • Generation 3 - #3 James Tate, b 1638 married 1st Anne Upham abt 1660, 2nd Anne Waddy abt 1685.
  • Generation 4 - #4 James Tate, b abt 1662, married Anne Waddy abt 1685 (parents listed for Anne Waddy are Samuel Waddy and Ann Craighill)

Doubtful that father and son would marry same person at same time!!

Waddy-51 and Upham-166 appear to represent the same person because: husbands and children are identical.
posted by Susan Peirce
Anne-95 and Upham-166 appear to represent the same person because: Same first name, same dates, same husband
posted by Bob Tonsmeire
Anne-95 and Waddy-19 do not represent the same person because: Bothe merged to a lower profile
posted by Bob Tonsmeire
Anne-95 and Waddy-10 appear to represent the same person because: Same name, same husband, same dates
posted by Bob Tonsmeire
Waddy-28 and Waddy-10 appear to represent the same person because: Same name, same husband, same date
posted by Bob Tonsmeire
Waddy-19 and Waddy-10 appear to represent the same person because: Same name, same husband, same dates
posted by Bob Tonsmeire
Anne-95 and Waddy-19 appear to represent the same person because: Same first name, same husband
posted by Bob Tonsmeire
Upham-226 and Upham-208 appear to represent the same person because: Same name, similar husband, same date
posted by Bob Tonsmeire
Upham-166 and Upham-239 appear to represent the same person because: Same name, same date
posted by Bob Tonsmeire
Upham-166 and Upham-186 appear to represent the same person because: Same name, same husband's name
posted by Bob Tonsmeire

Rejected matches › Anne (Waddy) Tate (abt.1664-)

U  >  Upham  |  T  >  Tate  >  Anne (Upham) Tate

Categories: Unsourced Profiles | Uncertain Family | Estimated Birth Date