no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Mary (Walker) Earle (abt. 1634 - abt. 1677)

Mary Earle formerly Walker
Born about in Roxbury, Massachusetts Bay Colonymap
Ancestors ancestors
Wife of — married before 2 Apr 1654 in Portsmouth, Newport, Rhode Islandmap [uncertain]
Descendants descendants
Died about at about age 43 in Portsmouth, Rhode Islandmap
Profile last modified | Created 27 Sep 2010
This page has been accessed 2,574 times.
The Birth Date is a rough estimate. See the text for details.

Biography

Mary Walker, daughter of John Walker and his wife Katherine ___, was born about 1634. [1] The place of birth is uncertain. According to Anderson[1], Mary's father arrived in Roxbury about 1633, and removed to Boston about 1637, So, if Mary was born in 1634, she would have been born in Roxbury. The family eventually moved to Portsmouth, Rhode Island.

She married William Earle by 1654. [1][2].

She probably passed away before 1677, as her husband, William Earle apparently married Prudence ______ about 1677[3].

Sources

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 The Great Migration Begins: Immigrants to New England 1620-1633
  2. U.S., New England Marriages Prior to 1700 (Provo, UT, USA, Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2012), Ancestry.com, Record for William Earle. http://search.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=NewEnglandMarriages&h=47835&indiv=try
  3. Hylbom Family Ancestry Project
  • The Great Migration Begins: Immigrants to New England 1620-1633, Volumes I-III. (Online database: AmericanAncestors.org, New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2010), (Originally Published as: New England Historic Genealogical Society. Robert Charles Anderson, The Great Migration Begins: Immigrants to New England 1620-1633, Volumes I-III, 3 vols., 1995). Page 1907.
  • Earle, Pliny. "The Earle Family: Ralph Earle and His Descendants." Worcester, MA: Press of Charles Hamilton, 1888. (available online)




Is Mary your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Mary by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Mary:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 12

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Walker-748 and Walker-57296 appear to represent the same person because: Same person
posted on Walker-57296 (merged) by Glenn Earls
Walker-57296 and Walker-748 are not ready to be merged because: I do not believe a merge should be completed because of the incomplete profile of the mother of Mary Earl Walker being unfinished which I refused to merge at this time.
posted by Barbara (Klein) Mills
Walker-57296 and Walker-748 appear to represent the same person because: same birth year, same parents, same spouse. child n -57296 is correct per Earle source on -748. Death info on -57296 is incorrect based on spouse's 2nd marriage. Please merge
posted by S (Hill) Willson
Walker-3240 and Walker-748 appear to represent the same person because: Same name, dates, places
posted by Anne B
This profile should probably be merged into Mary Walker and a profile for Prudence Unknown created and added as the second wife of William Earle, unless there is a more appropriate way of correcting this. I don't know what the best technical solution is.
posted by Daniel Nordlund
the data on this profile matches the second wife of William Earle, not his wife Mary. Can you check you records?
posted by Robin Lee
Walker-13460 and Walker-748 appear to represent the same person because: same name and husband, Walker-748 is well sourced and the data should be used in the merge
posted by Robin Lee
Walker-13461 and Walker-748 are not ready to be merged because: Looks close need more information to confirm
posted by David McKnight
Walker-5461 and Walker-748 appear to represent the same person because: same name, husband and father. birth date needs source
posted by Robin Lee
Walker-13461 and Walker-748 appear to represent the same person because: similar birth, same husband
posted by Robin Lee
Walker-3240 and Walker-14137 appear to represent the same person because: Looks like these two might be the same person, based on date of death. Perhaps one DOB is not certain--?
posted on Walker-3240 (merged) by Bob Nichol
Walker-8102 and Walker-5461 appear to represent the same person because: married husband with same ID#, born same location/date. I will research NEHGS tomorrow to see if I can verify date/location of death.

W  >  Walker  |  E  >  Earle  >  Mary (Walker) Earle

Categories: Newport County, Rhode Island | Spouses, Erleigh Name Study | Estimated Birth Date