A son would never be identified as a "Kinsman" in a will. Joseph Walker is most likely the uncle of John Walker. For this reason, John Walker is being detached as a son.
"Will of Joseph Walker of parish of St. Margaret's Westminister, 1666, names "Kinsman John Walker now living in Va." ([1][2] This John Walker was burgess for Warwick in 1644, 1646 and 1649, removed to Gloucester county, and was Lieut.- Colonel and Councillor in 1656." "Capt. Thomas Walker who represented Gloucester in 1663 was probably brother of Col. Walker..."[3]
Birth
John Walker[4] was born in England, which can be proven by his "kinsman" Joseph Walker mentioning him as "now living in Virginia."
Career
John Walker was burgess for Warwick in 1644, 1646 and 1649.[3] He removed to Gloucester county, and was Lieut.- Colonel and Councillor in 1656."[3]
John's will, dated Feb. 21, 1665, was proved Feb 3, 1668 (recorded Richmond Co. Feb 14 1706). A codicil dated July 6, 1668 names Anne and her husband John Payne. He bequethed land in Gloucester and [Old] Rappahannock County. All his children were under 16.[8][10]
Will of John Walker of Rappahannock County, dated Feb. 21 1665, proved by deposition Feb. 3 1668, recorded in Richmond County Feb. 14 1706.
Legatees: daughters Anne, Francis, Jane and Elizabeth Walker, his lands in Gloucester County to be equally divided when they are 16 or married. To daughters Sarah and Hester Walker, his lands in Rappahannock County, 1000 acres, and the remainder after their mother's death. They were under 16. To wife Sarah the remainder of his lands in Rappahannock County for her life and after her death Sarah and Hester receive 400 and 600 acres respectively. Cocicil dated July, 6 1668, "Whereas since the making of this will I have due me two tracts of land of 1030 and 900 acres on the east side of Rappahannock Creek, my wife to have them in lieu of her dower in the Gloucester lands." Legacy to daughter Anne and her husband John Payne.
Research Notes
Three patents to John WALKER were recorded among the York County Court Records. On 26 March 1660, Mr. John WALKER was granted 1,000 acres in Lancaster County. On 12 October 1660, Mr. John WALKER was granted 2,700 acres in the freshes of Rappahannock River-half was north of the river and half was south-and 1,000 acres in Northumberland County adjoining Col. Richard LEE, Esq.
The next significant of record in the life of Lt. Col. John WALKER is his marriage to Sarah, widow of Capt. Henry FLEETE of Lancaster County. Capt. FLEETE was present at the April 1660 term of court, and as Lt. Col. FLEETE was listed as a tithable (taxpayer) in November 1660. His widow, Mrs. Sarah FLEETE, was mentioned on 8 May 1661, and listed as a tithable 23 October 1661 (Documents 30-32). Apparently she married Lt. Col. WALKER between 23 and 28 October 1661, because a power of attorney made in Westmoreland County proves the marriage (Document 2c):
John WALLKER of Glocester County doe appointe Captn. James NEALE of Maryland, Esq., my attorney to demand a debt of 10,000 pounds of tobacco oweing by Mr. William PEIRCE of Potomeck unto Lt. Collonell FLEETE, deceased, and due unto mee by marriage with Mrs. Saragh FLEETE the relict and adminestratrix of Left. Collonell FLEETE.
Whereas it Appeareth by Divers Witnesses that had been Sworne and Examined that Edward MOZINGO a Negro man had been and was an apprentice by Indenture to Coll. Jno. WALKER and that by Computation his terme of Servitude for Twenty Eight yeares is now Expired, The Court after a fall heareing of the Matter In differrence Betweene the Said Edw. MOZINGO and Doctor STONE who marryed Coll. WALKER's Widdow, It is Adjudged by this Court that the said Edw. MOZINGO be and Remayne free to all Intents and purposes by order of This Court[12]
Sources
↑Prerogative Court of Canterbury and Related Probate Jurisdictions: Will Registers. Digitized images. Records of the Prerogative Court of Canterbury, Series PROB 11. The National Archives, Kew, England. PROB 11: Will Registers 1660-1673, Piece 323: Carr, Quire Numbers 1-58 (1667) $
↑ New England Historical and Genealogical Magazine, Vol. XXXIX, 1885. pg 166
↑ 3.03.13.2Genealogies of Virginia Families from the William and Mary College Quarterly. Vol. II. Cobb-Hay . pg. 806
↑ Douglas Richardson, Magna Carta Ancestry: A Study in Colonial and Medieval Families, 2nd edition, 4 vols., ed. Kimball G. Everingham (Salt Lake City, Utah: the author, 2011), vol. IV, page 4, SCOTT 15.ii.a: Henry Fleete. [1]
↑ Tim Hashaw, The Birth of Black America: The First African Americans and the Pursuit of Freedon at Jamestown, p. 230. Carroll & Graf Publishers, New York. 2007. accessed 2015 January 26.
↑ Headley, Robert K. Married Well and Often: Marriages of the Northern Neck of Virginia, 1649–1800. Baltimore, MD, USA: Genealogical Publishing Co., 2003. $
↑ 8.08.1 Judith McGhan. Virginia Will Records. Richmond County Wills. Baltimore: Genealogical Publishing Co., Inc., 1993. $
↑ Judith McGhan. Virginia Will Records. Records from Old Rappahannok County, Va.. Baltimore: Genealogical Publishing Co., Inc., 1993. $
↑ "Notes and Queries," The Virginia Magazine of History and Biography, Vol. 30, No. 4 (Oct., 1922), pp. 385-402 (Published by: Virginia Historical Society). [2]
↑Free African Americans of Maryland and Delaware and Free African Americans of North Carolina, Virginia and South CarolinaMozingo Family, compiled by Paul Heinegg.
Is John your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
No, this John Walker did not have any sons. Plus the DNA section of that bio is very sketchy. A match of 6 cm does not prove relationship at all. It is basically an Unsourced profile.
Ok thanks Liz. I will wait before proposing a merge for this profile. The bio is a perfect match for the target John Walker. I did remove the son John that was attached as he was the son of a Thomas and Unrelated
Eric - I was trying to figure that out when the merge was proposed. I think I must have inherited the parents? I've adopted a LOT of Walker profiles in search of who "my" David Walker's father was. Online trees suggest an Alexander Walker or a George Walker, and so I work on those names mostly. The Alexander Walker profile attached as brother of this John Walker has more notes - Walker-2351.
It's been a while since I've worked on the Walkers. I'll see if I can't find what led to Samuel and Elizabeth being attached as parents.
Walker-11423 and Walker-2095 appear to represent the same person because: This is either a duplicate with a wrong date or dosent belong connected. He is attached as brother of Walker-11423
Can i ask where the basis for the parents of Samuel Walker and Elizabeth Serrill. This John walker is mentioned as the Kinsman in the will of a Joseph Walker from Middlesex London. He is not the son of this Joseph because of the term Kinsman. He is more likely a Nephew as ive seen this term many times in English wills. If you can give me a lead, i can follow it up. Thanks Liz
?? John Walker (Walker-2077) was moved to be son of this John Walker instead of Walker-2095 (who is looking more like a duplicate by information in the profile, but less like one based on children named in this John's will - and they still have different parents).
Son John Walker (Walker-2077) was moved to be son of a different John Walker (Walker-4077) instead of this one (Walker-2095) - they still have different parents, and although they are looking more like duplicates by information in the datafields, I think that they are not - they still have different parents & the 1665 will of John Walker-4077 does not list a son named John (his profile shows "born 1663").
edited by Alan Pendleton
It's been a while since I've worked on the Walkers. I'll see if I can't find what led to Samuel and Elizabeth being attached as parents.
Will of John Walker
Sources to support the switch for Walker-2077?
And ... surely a son born 1663 would be named in his 1665 will!
Sources to support the switch for Walker-2077?
If none, I'll be switching him back.
Cheers, Liz