no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

James Williams Sr. (abt. 1725 - abt. 1785)

James Williams Sr.
Born about in Walesmap [uncertain]
Son of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Husband of — married [date unknown] (to 1755) in Sullivan, Virginiamap
Husband of — married [date unknown] [location unknown]
Husband of — married 1 Mar 1736 in St Saviour, Denmark Park, Surrey, Englandmap
Descendants descendants
Died about at about age 60 in Hawkins, Tennesseemap
Profile last modified | Created 26 May 2013
This page has been accessed 2,748 times.

Biography

Note: An alternate birth of about 1733 in Ireland has been proposed, but no documentary evidence has been produced to support that date. Similarly, a death in South Carolina has been proposed.

In his book, The Printers Devil, Sam Williams, who was a great-grandson of James Williams, states that James and his family left South Carolina in about 1773, moving to what was then western North Carolina, now eastern Tennessee. They settled not far from the site of present day Knoxville. The settlers built temporary log homes and a fort for shelter, and began planting crops. James was killed during an Indian attack while working in his fields.[1]

May have been born in North Carolina. Moved to Hawkins County, Tennessee; settled on Big Creek in 1770. Scalped & killed by Native Americans .[2]

Marriage: 1755, Sullivan County, Virginia, USA [Source?]

Possible Children:

Records that may belong to someone else

On 28 December 1793, James Williams was granted 100 acres in Hawkins County, North Carolina (now part of Tennessee). The land was "on the north side of Holston River on Flatt Creek." [3] Note: Flat Creek rises in Clinch Valley in Grainger County, runs south through Union County to Knox County, where it joins the Holston River at Mascot. The west half of Grainger County was part of Hawkins County until 1796, so James' land must have been on the headwaters of Flat Creek, probably in Clinch Valley.

1790 US Census - James Williams, Iredell County, North Carolina:

  • 2 Free White Males under 16
  • 2 Free White Males 16 and over
  • 4 Females
  • 1 Slave.

James Williams & Eliz. Brooks were married 1 March 1735/6 in St. Saviour Parish, Southwark, London, England. [4]

Sources

  1. Sam Williams, Printer's Devil: Some Ante-bellum Reminiscences of Hempstead County, Arkansas, by Sam Williams, edited by Mary Medearis, 1979, pages 197-199.
  2. Entered by Jim Payne.
  3. Tennessee, Early Land Registers, 1778-1927. Ancestry.com (includes an image of the grant)
  4. Title: London, England, Baptisms, Marriages and Burials, 1538-1812 Author: Ancestry.com




Is James your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with James by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with James:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 11

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Williams-30062 and Williams-17213 do not represent the same person because: Very little in common except name
posted by Neal Parker
From..

Hasenstab-19 Just Wondering Who James Williams Parrents Are???? Possible Mayflower Lineage.???.

posted by Lawrence Hasenstab
A different father was recently added without source. John Williams could not have been this person's father. Removed.
posted by Bobbie (Madison) Hall
I have some land from the surveyors records, in Washington county, Virginia, which givers land to a Jacob Williams, heir of John Williams, deceased. Said land was on the north side of the middle fork of the " Holstein " river, and had originally been settled in 1772. Does this have any connection to my 4th. great grandfather, James Williams, whose father was killed by the Indians?
posted by John Cook
Williams-17213 and Williams-68650 appear to represent the same person because: The children are the same (for the most part). Although dates and locations don't match all that well, one of the profiles is completely unsourced.
posted on Williams-68650 (merged) by William Horder
Williams-68650 and Williams-17213 do not represent the same person because: Different dates and places
posted by Rick Williams
Williams-68650 and Williams-17213 appear to represent the same person because: Clear duplicate. Need to merge children after merge
posted by Rick Williams
Williams-22570 and Williams-17213 appear to represent the same person because: Duplicates. Please merge
If this was the James Williams on the 1790 Census in Iredell County, NC, how could he have died in 1782.
posted by [Living Moore]
Hello Anne. I'm working on the Spring Clean-a-thon for Wikitree this weekend. Take a look at this profile and see if it duplicates the James Williams in your tree. https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Williams-20362

If it is the same you can work with Mitzie Katzen , profile manager of the other James, to merge the two. This might prevent confusion from our descendants.

Fellow Wiki Genealogist, Debbie https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Space:Database_Errors_Project_2017-04-16

During the merge of the profile of the son the conflicting father profiles were matched: James Williams (Williams-30062) and James Williams (Williams-22570).
posted by Philip van der Walt

Pending merges › James Patillo Williams (1730-1780)
Unmerged matches › James Williams (abt.1725-1782)
Rejected matches › James Williams III (1724-1776)

W  >  Williams  >  James Williams Sr.

Categories: Iredell County, North Carolina, Early Settlers