no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Nancy (Williamson) Stout (1822 - 1883)

Nancy Stout formerly Williamson
Born in Tyler, Virginia, United Statesmap
Ancestors ancestors
Wife of — married 23 Oct 1845 in Tyler, West Virginia, USAmap
Descendants descendants
Died at age 61 in Blue Rapids, Marshall, Kansas, United Statesmap
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Jim Williamson private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 9 May 2011
This page has been accessed 453 times.
Nancy (Williamson) Stout was born in Appalachia, in Virginia (now West Virginia).

Biography

Nancy was born in 1822. Nancy Williamson ... She passed away in 1883.

Sources


  • "West Virginia Marriages, 1780-1970," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:FBBB-68J : 11 February 2018), Elbert Stout and Nancy Williamson, 1845; citing Tyler, West Virginia, United States, , county clerks, West Virginia; FHL microfilm 1,862,797.




Is Nancy your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Nancy by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Nancy:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 4

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Williamson-7435 and Williamson-692 appear to represent the same person because: The match is correct - and the naming convention is in the proper format.

Maiden name is displayed, and married name is displayed as 'current' name since it is the name the person had after marriage (just like a married woman's drivers license displays her current name), as they should be for researchers who may only have the married name to work with and make the proper connections.

posted by Jim Williamson
Williamson-7435 and Williamson-692 do not represent the same person because: Every genealogy guidebook and web site says to enter women, just like men, with their BIRTH names, not one of possibly many MARRIED names. This person looks like a Williamson, but in fact has a last name of Stout. So until this error in format is corrected THEN I SAY NO TO THE MERGE!
posted by [Living Youngberg]
Williamson-7435 and Williamson-692 appear to represent the same person because: I'm not sure who rejected it, but it is pretty clear this is the same person
posted by Jim Williamson
Williamson-7435 and Williamson-692 do not represent the same person because: The last names do not match. One person looks like a Williamson (the birth name), but the last name is in fact listed as Stout (a married name). I do not like that a Williamson is listed as a Stout, and then this merge is to ruin other family trees with a wrong format of name. Treat women just like men please, list them by birth name as all genealogy books recommend, not by married name.
posted by [Living Youngberg]

W  >  Williamson  |  S  >  Stout  >  Nancy (Williamson) Stout

Categories: Virginia Appalachians