John Willis
Privacy Level: Open (White)

John Willis (abt. 1709 - bef. 1762)

John Willis
Born about in Hanover Parish, Richmond, Virginiamap
Ancestors ancestors
Husband of — married 17 Jan 1733 in St. Paul's Parish, King George County, Virginiamap
Descendants descendants
Died before before about age 53 in Orange, Virginiamap
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Linda Simmons private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 27 Jul 2011
This page has been accessed 2,409 times.

Contents

Biography

John Willis was born in 1709 in Hanover Parish, Richmond, Virginia. His parents were William Willis and Sarah Rozier. He married Elizabeth Plunkett on January 17, 1733 Together they had 13 children:

  1. Reuben Willis
  2. Margaret Willis
  3. Sarah Willis
  4. Frances Willis
  5. William Willis
  6. Benjamin Willis
  7. John Willis
  8. Lewis Willis
  9. Moses Willis
  10. Joshua Willis
  11. James Willis
  12. Mary Willis
  13. Joshua Willis

John also had the following child:

  1. Lewis Willis

He died on March 25, 1762 in Orange County, Virginia

Daughter Sarah married William Shropshire. Daughter Margaret married Edmund Terrill.


Pages 51-55- 22-23 July 1741. Benja. Smith of St. Thomas' Parish, Orange County, planter, to Thomas Smith of Washington Parish, Westmoreland County. Lease and release; for L60 current money. 100 acres ... corner to James Taylor ... in Francis Taliaferro's line ... George Taylor's line ... Benja. (X) Smith Wit: Zach. Taylor, William Plunckett [Plunkett], John Williss 23 July 1741. Acknowledged by Benja. Smith. 23 July 1741. Bond of Benja. Smith of St. Thomas' Parish, Orange County, to Thomas Smith of Washington Parish, Westmoreland County. For L120 current money. If the deeds prove not to be sufficient according to law, Benja. Smith will make any other deed required. Benja. (X) Smith Wit: Zach. Taylor, Wm. Plunckett, John Willis. 23 July 1741. Acknowledged by Benja. Smith. [1]

Will

Will of John Willis. Orange Co., VA, WB 2, p. 323, w. 25 Nov 1761, p. 25 Mar 1762. Digital image at Ancestry.com - https://www.ancestry.com/imageviewer/collections/62347/images/007645702_00367?pId=1013478

son William - slaves and “lott in Culpeper”
Edmund Terrill (no relationship given) - slaves
Walter Shropshire (no relationship given)
every child viz. John, Benjamin, Joshua, James, Rhewbin, Francis, Lewis, Moses & Mary
beloved wife (unnamed)
Exrs: son William, Edmund Terrill
Wit: Archd Campbell, Elizabeth Willis

[2] Will of John Willis, dated 25 Nov. 1761.

  • To my son William I give Thom and Judith and the Lott in Culpeper.
  • Daniel and Miller I give to Edmund Terrell.
  • Walker Shropshire I allow him one shilling and three pence.
  • And every child viz. John, Benjamin, Joshua, James, Rhewbin [Reuben], Francis, Lewis, Moses and Mary equally to be divided [sic].
  • My beloved wife shall keep in possession the aforesaid estate during her life.
  • The place formerly belonging to Mr. Marks belongs to Benjamin.
  • This place where I live belongs to John.

John (X) Willis Wit: Archd. Campbell, Elizabeth (W) Willis. My son William and Edmond Terrell executors. 25 March 1762. Presented into Court by William Willis. Proved by Archd. Campbell and Eliza. Willis.

Land

John Willis Sr. patented land on Oct. 21, 1669 next to land patented to John Washington which now lies in Hanover Parish, King George County, Virginia. This is referred to in a deed made by his grandson[3]

JOHN WILLIS of Hanover Par., King Geo. County, Virginia., Planter to William Robinson, Gent, of same place... "... whereas JOHN WILLIS SR., Dec’d, grandfather of the said JOHN WILLIS party to these presents was in his lifetime seized in Fee of 261 acres of land with all the appurtenances..situate lying and being in the aforesaid Parish of Hanover and County of King George which was granted unto him by letters Patent bearing the date of Oct. 21, 1669 and being so seized by deed or assignment indorsed on the back of the said letters Patent bearing the date of April 26, 1701 did give and grant unto his son WILLIAM WILLIS, now deceased and his heirs lawfully begotten of his body 161 acres of land part of the said 260 acres by the name of ALL THE REMAINING LAND OF THE WITHIN PATENT of land except 100 acres formerly given to his son JOHN WILLIS as by the said letters of Patent and assignment recorded in the County of Richmond relation thereunto my more at large appear and WHEREAS the said WILLIAM WILLIS is now dead and the 161 acres of land are descended and come to the said JOHN WILLIS party to these presents, thel eldest son and heir of the body of the said WILLIAM WILLIS whereby the said JOHN WILLIS is seized of the said premises in Fee tail and whereas by an inquisition taken before BENJ. BERRYMAN, Gent., Sheriff of sd King Geo. Co. on March last by birtue of a writ in the nature of and ad quod damnum to him directed pursuiant to the act of the Assembly in such cases made and provided it is found that the said 161 acres of land are of the value of 60 pounds sterling and no more and that same are a separate parcel and a parcel of or contigueous to other entailed alnds in the possession and seizen of the said JOHN WILLIS as by the inquisition now remaining in the Secretary’s office of this Colony relation being thereunto had may more at large apear... JOHN WILLIS doth hereby grant bargain and sell to said Wm. Robinson. Release is signed by ELIZABETH, wife of JOHN WILLIS. [4]

JOHN WILLIS, of Hanover Par., King Geo. County, Virginia., Planter and William Robinson, gent, and Joseph Strother and Maximilian Robinson, gent, .. church wardens of the parish on the other part...JOHN WILLIS and Wm. Robinson... do grant bargain and sell to said Strother and Max: Robinson.. all that tract and parcel of land containing by estimation 261 acres of land in Hanover Par., King Geo. County, Virginia., ..which said land was granted to JOHN WILLIS SR. grandfather of the said JOHN WILLIS party to these presents...by letters of patent dated Oct. 21, 1669... and 100 acres thereof were given by the said JOHN WILLIS SR., dec’d to his son JOHN WILLIS (dec’d) in feetail by a deed dated Dec. 10, 1694 and by the death of the said JOHN WILLIS, the son without issue are reverted and come to the said JOHN WILLIS party to these presents as heir-at-law of the said JOHN WILLIS the grandfather and the residue of the said premises were given by the said JOHN WILLIS (SR.) the grandfather to his son WILLIAM WILLIS father of the said JOHN WILLIS who is party to these presents.... [5] John COMBS came into Court and by virgue of Power of Attorney from WILLIAM WILLIS acknowledged a deed for land from the said WILLIAM WILLIS to John Hansford and same was admitted to record. Also by Power of Attorney from SARAH, wife of WILLIAM WILLIS to him in her behalf, relinquished the said SARAH’S right of dower in land conveyed to Hanxford, and deed was admitted to record. [6] [7]

Sources

  1. https://htracyhall.org/ocr/IRH-Genealogy/Cabinent%202/Drawer%204/New%20Folder%20(5)/JamesKincaid/JamesKincaid-0001_OCR.pdf
  2. 1744-1778 Orange County, Virginia Will Book 2: [John Frederick Dorman]: Page 323.
  3. (Order Bk. I, p 607, King Geo. County, Virginia., 1729-30).
  4. Deed Bk. 2, pp 126-127, June 1, 1737, King George County, Virginia.
  5. Richmond County, Order Bk. 5, p78, Sept. 7, 1709.
  6. DeHuff, Elizabeth Willis, Descendants of John Willis, of will in Richmond County, Virginia, 1715 Augusta, Ga.: unknown, 1962, 98 pgs.
  7. https://www.colonial-settlers-md-va.us/getperson.php?personID=I22477&tree=Tree1

LAger, Diebolt, Rausch, Laub Genealogy page ( RootsWeb 1/28/2011) is a good reference for this John Willis. Many documented references, of the xomlivayed family.





Is John your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with John by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. Y-chromosome DNA test-takers in his direct paternal line on WikiTree: It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with John:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 2

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Tiffany

The Willis YDNA project organizes kits by YDNA signature based on STR values. Those with similar signatures are grouped together. If the signature of your kinsmen who have taken the YDNA test does not match that of the signature of kit owners in the Rappahanock group, then your brother does not belong in that group. Haplogroup is based on a different type of marker (SNP), but can be determined (accurately up to a point) from STR data. In any case, the R-M269-haplo group split off from the human genetic about 10,000 years ago. The E-M35 haplogroup is far older. Which is to say that your brother has not had a male line ancestor in common with M269 for millennia, and he definitely does not belong in the Old Rappahanock Group.

That in itself does say anything about who your ancestor was. You might, for example have your ancestry exact right, and the kit owner in the Old Rappahanock group might have it wrong. You can only tell who has it right (if either of you do) by vetting the lineages with standard genealogical methods---in otherwords you have to look at the paper trail. In this particular case, I've' spent considerable time with the line of John Willis and Elizabeth Plunkett checking to see if they are my own ancestral couple (the answer was "No".) However, there is very good paper trail for the children of this couple, This comes in the form of a will for their eldest son Benjamin. Benjamin died a bachelor (a very wealthy bachelor as it happens), and divided up his estate among his brothers and sisters. Some of his siblings contested the will resulting in a considerable court record, providing even great detail about his siblings and their children.

Bottom line here is that we know from this the identity of John and Elizabeth's children. That list does not include a son James. While you may be descended from a James Willis, most likely he is not the son of John and Elizabeth. (I can imagine ways in which he could still be the son of John and Elizabeth, but still not be mentioned in the court records...unlikely, but conceivable. No one said doing genealogy well was easy).

You will want to verify this for yourself. Benjamin's will is treated (in exhaustive detail) in a 1961 work by DeHuff. It can be examined on Ancestry at https://www.ancestry.com/imageviewer/collections/28326/images/dvm_GenMono007778-00001-0?ssrc=pt&treeid=30059272&personid=27339399883&hintid=&usePUB=true&usePUBJs=true&pId=2000000000

It may be available elsewhere (family search? internet archive) but I know its on Ancestry.

And yes, I know James is listed (Twice) in this article's child list for John and Elizabeth. He appears to be included here simply because he's listed on other peoples tree's. If I were the manager of this page I'd remove him, but that's not my job.)

posted by Bill Willis
edited by Bill Willis
Hey genealogy sleuths! I wonder if anyone can address this for me -

I put my brother’s kit into the Willis group on FamilyTreeDNA and connected the Willis men I have on my tree to 3 groups they described.

They confirmed that we belong to the NC group as my brothers have Y-Haplo E-M35. However I got this response concerning 1709 John as the father of 1755 James:

“ In your tree, you show that the father of James Willis (1755-1796) is John Willis (1709-1762), who is in our “Old Rappahannock Group”. I have to question this. The members of our “Old Rappahannock Group” have the R-M269 haplogroup.”

We are showing that same 1709 John here as James’ father. Does anyone have information on this discrepancy?

Thanks in advance.

W  >  Willis  >  John Willis