| Sarah (Unknown) Allen is a part of Massachusetts history. Join: Massachusetts Project Discuss: massachusetts |
Historical justification for her maiden name as Tuck has been elusive.
Family files sometimes report she died 15 February 1764 (and, in the context of the birth information then shown, well into her 90s) at sometimes Hampton, New Hampshire, yet no historical records are shown. The same files sometimes report her birth "April 30, 1669 in Hampton, Rockingham, New Hampshire, United States," but Samuel Allen and his wife have a reported eldest child born before then.
In still other files, she is sometimes reported to have been born in 1636 at Beverly Massachsetts, and said the daughter of Mrs. Elizabeth Tuck. These reports, too, lack historical justification.
In 1945, Donald Lines Jacobus wrote, ""According to Mr. Tingley's book, Some Ancestral Lines ... Samuel Allen and two of his sons (all three) married a Sarah Tuck of Beverly. This we doubt. ..."[1]
In 1995, of her identification as a Tuck, Robert Charles Anderson cited Jacobus' work and wrote further, "She is said in some sources to be Sarah Tuck, but there is not evidence for this."[2]
Vital Records of Beverly, Massachusetts, to the end of the year 1849 report about the record of various Sarah Tucks born there, but the earliest of these records is for a birth in 1697.[3] A 1717 marriage was recorded at Beverly for "Sarah [Tuck] and Samuel Allen, Jr., of Manchester."[4]
Vital data updated to report Sarah (____) Allen died "after 1702" based on the will of her husband. According to source that follows, Samuel's will dated 21 November 1702, "devised and bequeathed certain properties to his wife Sarah (for life) ..."; the will was refused probate; see Raymond Frederick Allen, The Allens; from William Allen (1602-1679) of Manchester, England, and of Salem and Manchester, Massachusetts, in the direct line of descent through Nathaniel Allen (1744-1789) of Beverly, Massachusetts, and Sedgwick, Maine, to Lt. Raymond Frederick Allen, Jr. (1931- ) of Rochester, New York, with certain other descendants and collaterals …_ (Walton, N Y: Printed by the Reporter Co., 1958), pp. 1-20, sketch of William Allen (1602-1679).
See also:
Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.
Featured Foodie Connections: Sarah is 15 degrees from Emeril Lagasse, 19 degrees from Nigella Lawson, 19 degrees from Maggie Beer, 40 degrees from Mary Hunnings, 25 degrees from Joop Braakhekke, 24 degrees from Michael Chow, 19 degrees from Ree Drummond, 22 degrees from Paul Hollywood, 17 degrees from Matty Matheson, 21 degrees from Martha Stewart, 28 degrees from Danny Trejo and 22 degrees from Molly Yeh on our single family tree. Login to find your connection.
[Do you know Sarah's family name?] | A > Allen > Sarah (Unknown) Allen
Categories: Massachusetts Project-Managed
Edited to add: Sorry, re-working this. She probably died in Manchester, after 10 December 1710. According to Raymond Frederick Allen (1958), "ye land of ye widow Sarah Allin" was given as a boundary in the division of Samuel's estate, then dated. See Raymond Frederick Allen, The Allens; from William Allen (1602-1679) of Manchester, England, and of Salem and Manchester, Massachusetts ... (Walton, N. Y.: Printed by the Reporter Co., 1958), 20-23 (Samuel Allen, b. 1632) at 23; digital images, Hathi Trust.
edited by GeneJ X
(I also just checked the published Vital Records of Beverly to confirm the earliest reported birth of a Sarah Tuck there is in 1697.)
Sorry, I probably didn't explain that well.
One of the better statements I've seen on this was published by Donald Lines Jacobus in The Granberry Family ... (1945). Jacobus wrote (p. 148), "According to Mr. Tingley's book, Some Ancestral Lines ..." Samuel Allen and two of his sons (all three) married a Sarah Tuck of Beverly. This we doubt. ..."
Robert Charles Anderson, in his 1995 sketch about immigrant William^1 Allen cited Jacobus' remark and wrote of Samuel^2 Allen's wife, "She is said in some sources to be Sarah Tuck, but there is not evidence for this."
This identity issue has been known for a long time.
Has there been any progress?
We should try to resolve this before the merge is processed.