The son was married twice, the first time in 1686. The birthdate, 1673, on his profile implies he was married at age 13, which is pretty unlikely (although possible, I have never seen such a young marriage outside of royalty). I suspect a birthdate in the latter 1660s is more likely.
The biography gives a different, earlier, and slightly more credible birthdate for the son, but still, in my view makes him a bit young.
It is unknown, apparently, if there were other siblings, so the question arises was he born early or late in the marriage? This would have a significant effect on the estimate of the father’s birthdate.
The two profiles, of father and son, are either poorly or unsourced, thus providing little basis for estimating a birthdate.