Question

Wouldn't 1609 be a better b date since she married in 1636 seven years aft 1629?

Answer 1

Hi Rosemary, you are probably correct. However appropriate sources are necessary in order to make any changes.

Comments

This is the 1609 recordhttp://"England, Warwickshire, Parish Registers, 1535-1963," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:VHXH-1TZ : 13 March 2019), Alice Edmonds, 20 Apr 1608; from parish registers of the Church of England, database and images, citing Christening, Dunchurch, Warwickshire, England, Warwick County Record Office, England.
Daughter of John and Elizabeth Edmonds
However, the "Shires" don't seem to match.

---

Actually, I'd disagree there. Whilst appropriate sources are desirable, it is possible to estimate a birth date from a marriage date. She would not have been 7 years old at marriage.