There have been changes in both presentation and the amount of detail given on the FS 'transcriptions' for the England and Wales census.
Printouts from 2002 show that at that time household records included all servants, employees, inmates etc.
The 'form' had headings in the same order as on the original census so 1881: (name, relationship, married status, gender, age, birthplace, didability.)
Underneath was the 'source information'( Dwelling Place [house name/ number and Street if present in original] Census Place, Family History Library Film Number, Public Records Reference (i.e RG11 for 1881 census) Piece/Folio numbers, page number.)
There was also a link to the previous household and the next household.(very useful)
Now, as in Matthew's example , https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:Q27N-G2VC they don't always include the address (sometimes they do: another 1881 one that I just compared had a partial address under 'residence note'. It included the Street name but not the number(s)
Disabilities are rare but I've not seen disabilities included in FS recent transcriptions * Whether they chop up households seems to be variable
*In this 1871 example.The address (Dogkennel Farm, Southampton Road ) isn't included nor is the fact that James Ford is blind.https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:VFJ3-MRK
Both are important parts of the family history. (Jame's blindness possibly helps explain his late remarriage to an ex servant and the relatively unusual name of his infant daughter )
It's one of the reasons I find FS less useful for 19thC English genealogy than those sites which have census images.
