G2G: Does George Way qualify as a PGM immigrant? [closed]

Question

Thanks to Greg Purrinton for doing an excellent job revising the profile for George Way.  He notes that he was unable to find any evidence that George was in New England prior to 1650.  This is supported by the lack of an entry in the Great Migration Directory.  

Based on this, are there any objections to removing George Way's profile PGM designation?

Answer 1

Hi M Cole, 

Yes, kudos to WikiTreer Greg Purrinton for his research into and work on the profile of George Way. 

I agree that George Way can not be shown to have been in the colonies during the Puritan Great Migration period (ending early 1641), and that the PGM project box should be removed. 

Given George's disputed origins and common errors about the man, do we think co-management should continue as a a Puritan Great Migration Adunct profile?   

Thank you also, Marina, for tending to this proposed change.--Gene

Comments

Thank you for the star, Cheryl!--Gene