My point is there is NO source at all for a "Fisher" to be a son of John Briggs, let alone that a "Fisher" is father to a Briggs.
It has nothing to do with naming someone after a grandfather.
John Briggs-397 has a number of children all named Briggs except for this "Fisher". For some unknown reason, someone has attached Fisher to Briggs with not source or explanation that I could see.
I have NO information that would support Thomas Fisher as a son of John Briggs and I believe he should be removed.